Comparing Pain Outcomes of Treatment Strategies for Osteoarthritis Knee Patients

NCT ID: NCT05700253

Last Updated: 2023-01-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

76 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-02-28

Study Completion Date

2024-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two different pain relief techniques (cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) and hyaluronic acid (HA) injection) for patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) over a period of 6 months. The main questions it aims to answer are:

* the extent of reduction of pain score and the proportion of subjects ("responders") whose knee pain is reduced by at least 50% from baseline up to 6 months after treatment in the two treatment groups.
* the safety of the two treatment modalities.

Participants will undergo a nerve block test to determine if they would experience pain relief from blocking of nerve signals. Responders will be randomised to receive one of the two treatments for their knee pain. Researchers will compare the pain intensity of CRFA and HA injection groups at baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months post-treatment using validated questionnaires.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study will be a single-centred, open-label, prospective randomized controlled study to compare the extent of OA-related knee pain relief between subjects who undergo radiofrequency lesioning (COOLIEF\* CRFA; Avanos Medical) of the genicular nerves and subjects who receive a single intra-articular HA injection (Synvisc-One \[Hylan G-F 20\]; Sanofi). Study subjects will receive CRFA or HA injection in a 1:1 randomization scheme, with post-treatment data collection at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months. Six months was chosen as the duration of follow-up as that is the expected duration of medical improvement following HA injection for chronic knee pain. Knee pain, function, overall subject impressions of treatment, quality of life, pain medication use, and adverse events will be compared among the treatment cohorts. The study is open-label as blinding is not possible due to the differences in administration of injection and CRFA, hence both the patient and the investigator will be aware of the treatment type.

The primary endpoints will be the extent of reduction of pain score measured via 11-point visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes will include proportion of subjects ("responders") whose knee pain is reduced by at least 50% from baseline up to 6 months after treatment, patients' overall knee pain score as measured via Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), subjects' perception of treatment effect as measured via Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), patients' perception of treatment effect via Global Perceived Effect (GPE) score and health related quality of life via EuroQol-5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L). Assessments of these study endpoints will be made at baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months following treatment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis, Knee Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation

Relieves pain by blocking pain signals via the deactivation of nerve structures using radiofrequency energy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Image-guided genicular nerve ablation will be performed with the Coolief System (COOLIEF\* CRFA; Avanos Medical).

Hyaluronic Acid Injection

Injection of hyaluronic acid into the affected knee provides lubrication and shock absorption.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Hyaluronic Acid Injection

Intervention Type DEVICE

Synvisc-One (\[Hylan G-F 20\]; Sanofi) will be administered as a single intra-articular dose (6 mL).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation

Image-guided genicular nerve ablation will be performed with the Coolief System (COOLIEF\* CRFA; Avanos Medical).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Hyaluronic Acid Injection

Synvisc-One (\[Hylan G-F 20\]; Sanofi) will be administered as a single intra-articular dose (6 mL).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age ≥ 21 years
2. Able to understand the informed consent form and provide written informed consent and able to complete outcome measures
3. Chronic knee pain for longer than 3 months that interferes with functional activities (for example, ambulation, prolonged standing, etc.)
4. Continued pain in the target knee despite at least 3 months of conservative treatments, including activity modification, home exercise, protective weight bearing, and/or analgesics (for example, acetaminophen or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs \[NSAIDs\] etc.)
5. Positive response (defined as a decrease in numeric pain scores of at least 50%) to a single genicular nerve block of the index knee
6. Pain on VAS ≥ 6 on an 11-point scale for the index knee
7. Radiologic confirmation of arthritis (x-ray/MRI/CT) of OA grade of 2 (mild), 3 (moderate) or 4 (severe) noted within 6 months for the index knee
8. An intra-articular HA injection is indicated as an appropriate treatment option
9. WOMAC Knee Score group at baseline of Score of ≥ 2 (0 to 4 scale) on WOMAC question 1 (Pain) and a mean score of ≥ 1.5 on all five questions of the WOMAC pain subscale
10. Agree to see one physician (study physician) for knee pain during the study period
11. Willing to delay any surgical intervention for the index knee for the period of the study follow up
12. Willing to comply with the requirements of this protocol for the full duration of the study

Exclusion Criteria

1. Evidence of inflammatory arthritis (for example, rheumatoid arthritis) or other systemic inflammatory condition (for example, gout, fibromyalgia) that could cause knee pain
2. Evidence of neuropathic pain secondary to other causes (e.g., sciatica), apart from OA knee, affecting the index knee
3. Previous or pending lower limb amputation
4. Intra-articular steroid or PRP injection or Radiofrequency lesioning into the index knee within 180 days from randomization
5. Hyaluronic acid injection, PRP injection, stem cell, or arthroscopic debridement/lavage injection into the index knee within 180 days from randomization
6. Prior partial, resurfacing, or total knee arthroplasty of the index knee (residual hardware)
7. Clinically significant ligamentous laxity of the index knee
8. Clinically significant valgus/varus deformities or evidence of pathology (other than osteoarthritis of knee) that materially affects gait or function of the knee or is the underlying cause of the knee pain and/or functional limitations
9. Body mass index (BMI) \> 45 kg/m2 or \< 18 kg/m2
10. Extremely thin patients and those with minimal subcutaneous tissue thickness that would not accommodate a radiofrequency lesion of up to 14 mm in diameter to limit the risk of skin burns
11. Pending or active compensation claim, litigation, or disability remuneration (secondary gain)
12. Pregnant, nursing or intent of becoming pregnant during the study period
13. Chronic pain associated with significant psychosocial dysfunction
14. Patients with known psychiatric history including severe mental health issues.
15. Allergies to any of the medications to be used during the procedures, including known hypersensitivity (allergy) to hyaluronate preparations or allergies to avian or avian-derived products (including eggs, feathers, or poultry)
16. Active joint infection or systemic or localized infection at needle entry sites (subject may be considered for inclusion once infection is resolved)
17. History of uncontrolled coagulopathy, ongoing coagulation treatment that cannot be safely interrupted for procedure, or unexplained or uncontrollable bleeding that is not correctable
18. Identifiable anatomical variability that would materially alter the procedure as described in the protocol
19. Within the preceding 2 years, subject has suffered from active narcotic addiction, substance, or alcohol abuse
20. Current prescribed opioid medications greater than 60 milligrams morphine equivalent daily opioid dose
21. Uncontrolled immunosuppression (e.g., AIDS, cancer, diabetes, etc.)
22. Subject currently implanted with pacemaker, stimulator or defibrillator
23. Participating in another clinical trial/investigation within 30 days prior to signing informed consent
24. Subject unwilling or unable to comply with follow up schedule or protocol requirements
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Changi General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Prit Anand Singh

Senior Consultant, Department of Anaesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Prit Anand Singh

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Changi General Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Changi General Hospital

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Singapore

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Seok Hwee Koo, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+6568504929

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wu L, Li Y, Si H, Zeng Y, Li M, Liu Y, Shen B. Radiofrequency Ablation in Cooled Monopolar or Conventional Bipolar Modality Yields More Beneficial Short-Term Clinical Outcomes Versus Other Treatments for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Arthroscopy. 2022 Jul;38(7):2287-2302. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.01.048. Epub 2022 Feb 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35157969 (View on PubMed)

Oladeji LO, Cook JL. Cooled Radio Frequency Ablation for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis-Related Knee Pain: Evidence, Indications, and Outcomes. J Knee Surg. 2019 Jan;32(1):65-71. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675418. Epub 2018 Nov 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30396206 (View on PubMed)

Chen AF, Khalouf F, Zora K, DePalma M, Kohan L, Guirguis M, Beall D, Loudermilk E, Pingree MJ, Badiola I, Lyman J. Cooled radiofrequency ablation provides extended clinical utility in the management of knee osteoarthritis: 12-month results from a prospective, multi-center, randomized, cross-over trial comparing cooled radiofrequency ablation to a single hyaluronic acid injection. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jun 9;21(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03380-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32517739 (View on PubMed)

Chen AF, Khalouf F, Zora K, DePalma M, Kohan L, Guirguis M, Beall D, Loudermilk E, Pingree M, Badiola I, Lyman J. Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation Compared with a Single Injection of Hyaluronic Acid for Chronic Knee Pain: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial Demonstrating Greater Efficacy and Equivalent Safety for Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Sep 2;102(17):1501-1510. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00935.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32898379 (View on PubMed)

Lyman J, Khalouf F, Zora K, DePalma M, Loudermilk E, Guiguis M, Beall D, Kohan L, Chen AF. Cooled radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves provides 24-Month durability in the management of osteoarthritic knee pain: Outcomes from a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial. Pain Pract. 2022 Jul;22(6):571-581. doi: 10.1111/papr.13139. Epub 2022 Jun 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35716058 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Osteoarthritis01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Knee OsteoArthritis Long-term Assessment
NCT06839222 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
PRP-HA Versus HA in Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT05076526 UNKNOWN PHASE2/PHASE3