Comparing Pain Outcomes of Treatment Strategies for Osteoarthritis Knee Patients
NCT ID: NCT05700253
Last Updated: 2023-01-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
76 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-02-28
2024-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* the extent of reduction of pain score and the proportion of subjects ("responders") whose knee pain is reduced by at least 50% from baseline up to 6 months after treatment in the two treatment groups.
* the safety of the two treatment modalities.
Participants will undergo a nerve block test to determine if they would experience pain relief from blocking of nerve signals. Responders will be randomised to receive one of the two treatments for their knee pain. Researchers will compare the pain intensity of CRFA and HA injection groups at baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months post-treatment using validated questionnaires.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cooled Radiofrequency vs. Hyaluronic Acid to Manage Knee Pain
NCT03381248
Efficacy of Hyaluronic Acid Injection in Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT06279507
Nerve Ablation by Cooled Radiofrequency Compared to Corticosteroid Injection for Management of Knee Pain
NCT02343003
Intra-articular Pulsed Radiofrequency Neuromodulation Versus Intra-articular Steroids for Painful Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT04238598
Intra-articular Corticosteroid Injection Compared With Single-Shot Hyaluronic Acid for Treatment of Osteoarthritis Knee
NCT01874574
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary endpoints will be the extent of reduction of pain score measured via 11-point visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes will include proportion of subjects ("responders") whose knee pain is reduced by at least 50% from baseline up to 6 months after treatment, patients' overall knee pain score as measured via Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), subjects' perception of treatment effect as measured via Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), patients' perception of treatment effect via Global Perceived Effect (GPE) score and health related quality of life via EuroQol-5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L). Assessments of these study endpoints will be made at baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months following treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation
Relieves pain by blocking pain signals via the deactivation of nerve structures using radiofrequency energy.
Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation
Image-guided genicular nerve ablation will be performed with the Coolief System (COOLIEF\* CRFA; Avanos Medical).
Hyaluronic Acid Injection
Injection of hyaluronic acid into the affected knee provides lubrication and shock absorption.
Hyaluronic Acid Injection
Synvisc-One (\[Hylan G-F 20\]; Sanofi) will be administered as a single intra-articular dose (6 mL).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation
Image-guided genicular nerve ablation will be performed with the Coolief System (COOLIEF\* CRFA; Avanos Medical).
Hyaluronic Acid Injection
Synvisc-One (\[Hylan G-F 20\]; Sanofi) will be administered as a single intra-articular dose (6 mL).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Able to understand the informed consent form and provide written informed consent and able to complete outcome measures
3. Chronic knee pain for longer than 3 months that interferes with functional activities (for example, ambulation, prolonged standing, etc.)
4. Continued pain in the target knee despite at least 3 months of conservative treatments, including activity modification, home exercise, protective weight bearing, and/or analgesics (for example, acetaminophen or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs \[NSAIDs\] etc.)
5. Positive response (defined as a decrease in numeric pain scores of at least 50%) to a single genicular nerve block of the index knee
6. Pain on VAS ≥ 6 on an 11-point scale for the index knee
7. Radiologic confirmation of arthritis (x-ray/MRI/CT) of OA grade of 2 (mild), 3 (moderate) or 4 (severe) noted within 6 months for the index knee
8. An intra-articular HA injection is indicated as an appropriate treatment option
9. WOMAC Knee Score group at baseline of Score of ≥ 2 (0 to 4 scale) on WOMAC question 1 (Pain) and a mean score of ≥ 1.5 on all five questions of the WOMAC pain subscale
10. Agree to see one physician (study physician) for knee pain during the study period
11. Willing to delay any surgical intervention for the index knee for the period of the study follow up
12. Willing to comply with the requirements of this protocol for the full duration of the study
Exclusion Criteria
2. Evidence of neuropathic pain secondary to other causes (e.g., sciatica), apart from OA knee, affecting the index knee
3. Previous or pending lower limb amputation
4. Intra-articular steroid or PRP injection or Radiofrequency lesioning into the index knee within 180 days from randomization
5. Hyaluronic acid injection, PRP injection, stem cell, or arthroscopic debridement/lavage injection into the index knee within 180 days from randomization
6. Prior partial, resurfacing, or total knee arthroplasty of the index knee (residual hardware)
7. Clinically significant ligamentous laxity of the index knee
8. Clinically significant valgus/varus deformities or evidence of pathology (other than osteoarthritis of knee) that materially affects gait or function of the knee or is the underlying cause of the knee pain and/or functional limitations
9. Body mass index (BMI) \> 45 kg/m2 or \< 18 kg/m2
10. Extremely thin patients and those with minimal subcutaneous tissue thickness that would not accommodate a radiofrequency lesion of up to 14 mm in diameter to limit the risk of skin burns
11. Pending or active compensation claim, litigation, or disability remuneration (secondary gain)
12. Pregnant, nursing or intent of becoming pregnant during the study period
13. Chronic pain associated with significant psychosocial dysfunction
14. Patients with known psychiatric history including severe mental health issues.
15. Allergies to any of the medications to be used during the procedures, including known hypersensitivity (allergy) to hyaluronate preparations or allergies to avian or avian-derived products (including eggs, feathers, or poultry)
16. Active joint infection or systemic or localized infection at needle entry sites (subject may be considered for inclusion once infection is resolved)
17. History of uncontrolled coagulopathy, ongoing coagulation treatment that cannot be safely interrupted for procedure, or unexplained or uncontrollable bleeding that is not correctable
18. Identifiable anatomical variability that would materially alter the procedure as described in the protocol
19. Within the preceding 2 years, subject has suffered from active narcotic addiction, substance, or alcohol abuse
20. Current prescribed opioid medications greater than 60 milligrams morphine equivalent daily opioid dose
21. Uncontrolled immunosuppression (e.g., AIDS, cancer, diabetes, etc.)
22. Subject currently implanted with pacemaker, stimulator or defibrillator
23. Participating in another clinical trial/investigation within 30 days prior to signing informed consent
24. Subject unwilling or unable to comply with follow up schedule or protocol requirements
21 Years
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Changi General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Prit Anand Singh
Senior Consultant, Department of Anaesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Prit Anand Singh
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Changi General Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Changi General Hospital
Singapore, , Singapore
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wu L, Li Y, Si H, Zeng Y, Li M, Liu Y, Shen B. Radiofrequency Ablation in Cooled Monopolar or Conventional Bipolar Modality Yields More Beneficial Short-Term Clinical Outcomes Versus Other Treatments for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Arthroscopy. 2022 Jul;38(7):2287-2302. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.01.048. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
Oladeji LO, Cook JL. Cooled Radio Frequency Ablation for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis-Related Knee Pain: Evidence, Indications, and Outcomes. J Knee Surg. 2019 Jan;32(1):65-71. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675418. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
Chen AF, Khalouf F, Zora K, DePalma M, Kohan L, Guirguis M, Beall D, Loudermilk E, Pingree MJ, Badiola I, Lyman J. Cooled radiofrequency ablation provides extended clinical utility in the management of knee osteoarthritis: 12-month results from a prospective, multi-center, randomized, cross-over trial comparing cooled radiofrequency ablation to a single hyaluronic acid injection. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jun 9;21(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03380-5.
Chen AF, Khalouf F, Zora K, DePalma M, Kohan L, Guirguis M, Beall D, Loudermilk E, Pingree M, Badiola I, Lyman J. Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation Compared with a Single Injection of Hyaluronic Acid for Chronic Knee Pain: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial Demonstrating Greater Efficacy and Equivalent Safety for Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Sep 2;102(17):1501-1510. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00935.
Lyman J, Khalouf F, Zora K, DePalma M, Loudermilk E, Guiguis M, Beall D, Kohan L, Chen AF. Cooled radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves provides 24-Month durability in the management of osteoarthritic knee pain: Outcomes from a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial. Pain Pract. 2022 Jul;22(6):571-581. doi: 10.1111/papr.13139. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Avanos Coolief System
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Osteoarthritis01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.