Comparative Effectiveness of Hyaluronic Acid Injections for Management of Knee Osteoarthritis

NCT ID: NCT02671565

Last Updated: 2021-08-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

13849 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-02-29

Study Completion Date

2016-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease in which there is an imbalance between the breakdown and repair of the joint tissue. Intraarticular hyaluronic acid (HA) injections are used for the management of knee OA. Currently, there is limited and inconclusive evidence supporting use of HA injections for management of knee OA. The primary objective of our study is to evaluate the effectiveness of HA injections in the management of knee OA. Investigators will evaluate if HA injections prevent or delay knee OA surgical interventions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease in which there is an imbalance between the breakdown and repair of the joint tissue.Intraarticular hyaluronic acid (HA) injections are used for the management of knee OA. The pooled estimates of randomized clinical trials in various meta-analyses do not have consistent conclusions, some conclude no benefit while others conclude small benefit (reducing the pain or improving the daily functioning) to overall benefit (alleviating pain as well as improving daily functioning).The variation in conclusions is due to the heterogeneity in the methodology of the clinical trials included in these meta-analyses as well as a difference in the interpretation of clinical findings.Furthermore, most of the trials (63%) evaluating efficacy of HA are industry funded, raising the concern for publication bias. Furthermore Although the evidence favoring the use of HA injections is limited, these injections still have a significant market share with an annual sale of $725 million per year. Given the high dollar amount spent on the intervention, evaluation of its effectiveness in real world setting is important. Currently, there is limited and inconclusive evidence supporting use of HA injections for management of knee OA. The primary objective of the current study is to evaluate the effectiveness of HA injections in the management of knee OA. Specifically, the investigators will compare the risk of any surgical intervention of knee as a primary outcome among the knee OA patients who are exposed to HA injections with those who are not exposed to HA injections (HA non-users) and those who are exposed to intra-articular corticosteroid (CS) injections. Three separate outcome definitions, which includes: i) composite surgical outcome measure (includes total knee replacement, partial knee replacement, arthroscopic procedures, osteotomy and free-floating inter-positional devices), ii) total and partial knee replacements only and iii) total knee replacement (TKR) only will be used to compare the effectiveness of HA users with HA non-users and CS users.

This study will be conducted using knee OA patients aged 40 years and above from the Lifelink Plus claims data (2006-2015). Knee OA patients with a specialist visit and a recent history of medications used for pain management (proxy for moderate-severe pain) will be identified. Patients will be classified into 3 groups: 1) HA users, 2) CS users and 3) HA non-users based on exposure/non-exposure to these interventions within first 90 days after specialist visit. HA users will be matched separately with two comparison (CS users and HA non-users) groups using a propensity score matching approach to reduce the imbalance between the intervention and comparison group. HA users will be matched separately to each comparison group (1:1 ratio) using a greedy matching approach within a predefined caliper (0.2 of the pooled standard deviation of the logit of the PS). Cox models will be used to compare the risk of 1) any surgical interventions for knee, 2) TKR and partial knee replacements only and 3) TKR only, among HA users and the comparison groups. For both comparisons, investigators will use four approaches to compare the risk of each outcome measure: 1) Unadjusted bivariate analysis, 2) Adjusted multivariate analysis, 3) Propensity score-matched sample and 4) Inverse probability weighting (IPW) using propensity score.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Knee Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hyaluronic acid (HA) injection users

Patients with at least one procedure claim for intra-articular administration of hyaluronic acid (procedure codes: J7320, J7322, J7325, Q4084, J7317, Q4083, J7321, Q4085, J7323, Q4086, J7324, J7327, J7326) within 90 days after their first specialist (physical medicine, physical therapy, orthopedic surgeon, rheumatologist or orthopedic) visit will be considered as HA users.

Hyaluronic Acid injections

Intervention Type DRUG

Corticosteroids (CS) injections users

Patients with at least one procedure claim for intra-articular administration of corticosteroids (procedure codes: J1020, J1030, J1040, J1094, J1100, J2920, J2930, J0702, J0704, J3300, J3301, J3302, J3303, J1700, J1710, J1720, J2650, J2920, J2930) within 90 days after their first specialist (physical medicine, physical therapy, orthopedic surgeon, rheumatologist or orthopedic) visit will be considered as CS users.

No interventions assigned to this group

HA non-users

Patients who do not have any claims for procedural or surgical intervention including HA and CS injections in first 90 days after their first specialist visit will be considered as HA non-users

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hyaluronic Acid injections

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Synvisc, Orthovisc, Euflexxa, Monovisc, Hyglan or Supartz

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with a specialist visit (orthopedic surgeon, physical medicine and rehabilitation, orthopedic, physical therapy, and rheumatologist) will enter in cohort and the date of the first visit will be considered as index date.
* Patients should have at least one claim with a primary diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis (ICD-9-Center for Medicare (CM) code 715.x6) on the index date
* Patients with a specialist visit should have at least one claim for pain medications (NSAIDs or opioids) within 90 days prior to or on the day of visit.
* The age of a patient should be at least 40 years on the date of their index date
* Patients to have continuous eligibility for pharmacy and medical benefits for at least six months prior to their index diagnosis.
* Patients to have at least three months of continuous eligibility for pharmacy and medical benefits after their index diagnosis.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with a procedure claim for HA or CS in the pre-index period
* Patients with a procedure claim for knee OA surgical procedures (arthroscopic procedures, osteotomy, free-floating interpositional devices, partial and total knee replacement) in the pre-index period.
* In order to focus on knee OA pain, patients with a claim for joint fusion, rheumatoid arthritis, knee fracture, post-traumatic arthritis, avascular necrosis, benign/malignant bone tumors and Paget's disease in the pre-index period will be excluded
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Arkansas

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bradley Martin, PharmD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Arkansas

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Litwic A, Edwards MH, Dennison EM, Cooper C. Epidemiology and burden of osteoarthritis. Br Med Bull. 2013;105:185-99. doi: 10.1093/bmb/lds038. Epub 2013 Jan 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23337796 (View on PubMed)

Hochberg MC, Altman RD, April KT, Benkhalti M, Guyatt G, McGowan J, Towheed T, Welch V, Wells G, Tugwell P; American College of Rheumatology. American College of Rheumatology 2012 recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Apr;64(4):465-74. doi: 10.1002/acr.21596.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22563589 (View on PubMed)

Arrich J, Piribauer F, Mad P, Schmid D, Klaushofer K, Mullner M. Intra-articular hyaluronic acid for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2005 Apr 12;172(8):1039-43. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1041203.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15824412 (View on PubMed)

Medina JM, Thomas A, Denegar CR. Knee osteoarthritis: should your patient opt for hyaluronic acid injection? J Fam Pract. 2006 Aug;55(8):669-75. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16882439 (View on PubMed)

Bannuru RR, Natov NS, Obadan IE, Price LL, Schmid CH, McAlindon TE. Therapeutic trajectory of hyaluronic acid versus corticosteroids in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Dec 15;61(12):1704-11. doi: 10.1002/art.24925.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19950318 (View on PubMed)

Lo GH, LaValley M, McAlindon T, Felson DT. Intra-articular hyaluronic acid in treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2003 Dec 17;290(23):3115-21. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.23.3115.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14679274 (View on PubMed)

Wang CT, Lin J, Chang CJ, Lin YT, Hou SM. Therapeutic effects of hyaluronic acid on osteoarthritis of the knee. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Mar;86(3):538-45. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200403000-00012.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14996880 (View on PubMed)

Bellamy N, Campbell J, Robinson V, Gee T, Bourne R, Wells G. Intraarticular corticosteroid for treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19;(2):CD005328. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005328.pub2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16625636 (View on PubMed)

Printz JO, Lee JJ, Knesek M, Urquhart AG. Conflict of interest in the assessment of hyaluronic acid injections for osteoarthritis of the knee: an updated systematic review. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep;28(8 Suppl):30-33.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.05.034. Epub 2013 Jul 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23890521 (View on PubMed)

Bannuru RR, Natov NS, Dasi UR, Schmid CH, McAlindon TE. Therapeutic trajectory following intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection in knee osteoarthritis--meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Jun;19(6):611-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.09.014. Epub 2011 Apr 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21443958 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

204982

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.