Healthy Starts: Repeated Exposure Pilot

NCT ID: NCT05639361

Last Updated: 2023-05-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

180 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-04-01

Study Completion Date

2024-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Decades of research have established that providing repeated exposure to new foods is the most robust strategy for promoting children's acceptance of new foods (1). However, there is little guidance on how best to translate this recommendation into everyday family life about how often to introduce children to new foods. We propose to conduct a proof-of-concept randomized trial that will evaluate three different schedules of repeated exposure to a novel vegetable, which will help to identify the optimal "pacing" of repeated exposure to promote children's acceptance (i.e., intake) of new vegetables. Here we define "pacing" as how often (every day, every few days, etc.) and across what interval of time (days, weeks, months) repeated exposure is effective for infants to learn to accept a novel food.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Child acceptance of a novel vegetable will be assessed at 4 periodic consumption tests. Participants will visit the Children's Eating Laboratory where caregivers will offer their infants the novel vegetable in the format of their choice (pureed, mashed, or cut into small pieces). These visits will occur at: 1) baseline; 2) 2 weeks to obtain an interim measure of acceptance; 3) 6 weeks to measure acceptance at the end of the exposure period, and 4) 3 months (approximately 6 weeks from the end of the exposure period) to measure longer-term acceptance. Caregivers will be asked not to feed their child less than 90 minutes before arriving for their visit, so that their child will be hungry when they are being offered food. The feeding sessions during each visit will be video recorded. Child acceptance of the novel vegetable will be measured by intake (consumption in grams) and rate of acceptance. The vegetable will be weighed before and after it is offered to calculate intake by the child. The videos will be coded by trained coders trained to reliability, who will code for the child's rate of acceptance of the novel food, which ranges from rejection of the food to eager anticipation of the bite (Hetherington et al. 2016 Food Qual Prefer; Nekitsing et al. 2016 Food Qual Prefer), and for child and caregiver behaviors (Barrett et al. 2021 Curr Dev Nutr).

Caregivers will be provided the novel vegetable to offer their child at home. They will be asked to offer a small taste (2 small bites' worth or up to 3 rejections) at the intervals specified above. During the in-home exposure period, caregivers will be asked to keep a brief log of each offer of the novel food. These logs will include the method of food preparation (pureed or mashed vs. whole or in small pieces), whether the caregiver fed the child or the child fed themselves, whether the child tasted the food, and the caregiver's perception of the child's liking of the vegetable.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Feeding Behavior

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard Condensed

Will complete a "traditional" schedule of 10 exposures over a 2-week period followed by a one-month "break" period before the final assessment. Because this schedule of exposure has been used most frequently in repeated exposure studies, this group will serve as the reference group.

Repeated Exposure

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Caregivers will be asked to offer a novel vegetable to their infant/toddler 10 times at home according to the schedule of repeated exposure to which they are randomized.

Periodic

Will complete a schedule of 5 exposures over a 2-week period, followed by a 2-week break, and then another 5 exposures over an additional 2-week period.

Repeated Exposure

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Caregivers will be asked to offer a novel vegetable to their infant/toddler 10 times at home according to the schedule of repeated exposure to which they are randomized.

Extended

Will complete a schedule of 10 exposures over a continuous 6-week period of time (approximately one exposure every 3-5 days).

Repeated Exposure

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Caregivers will be asked to offer a novel vegetable to their infant/toddler 10 times at home according to the schedule of repeated exposure to which they are randomized.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Repeated Exposure

Caregivers will be asked to offer a novel vegetable to their infant/toddler 10 times at home according to the schedule of repeated exposure to which they are randomized.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult caregivers ≥ 18 years of age
* Infants 9-12 months of age
* Infants born ≥ 37 weeks gestational age
* Infants have not been diagnosed with developmental delays, congenital or other medical conditions that may interfere with feeding (e.g., dysphagia).

Exclusion Criteria

* Caregivers younger than 18 years of age
* Caregivers do not speak English or Spanish
* Caregivers do not live in the Denver Metro area
* Infants who were born \< 37 weeks gestational age
* Infants have been diagnosed with a developmental delay or congenital or medical condition that may interfere with feeding.
Minimum Eligible Age

9 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Temple University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Vitamix Foundation

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Colorado, Denver

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Katherine J Barrett, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Colorado, Denver

Susan L Johnson, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Colorado, Denver

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Katherine J Barrett, PhD

Role: CONTACT

3037244710

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Katherine J Barrett, PhD

Role: primary

303-724-2922

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hetherington MM, Madrelle J, Nekitsing C, Barends C, de Graaf C, Morgan S, Parrott H, Weenen H. Developing a novel tool to assess liking and wanting in infants at the time of complementary feeding - The Feeding Infants: Behaviour and Facial Expression Coding System (FIBFECS). Food Quality and Preference. 2016; 48: 238-250.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Nekitsing C, Madrelle J, Barends C, de Graaf C, Parrott H, Morgan S, Weenen H, Hetherington MM. Application and validation of the Feeding Infants: Behaviour and Facial Expression Coding System (FIBFECS) to assess liking and wanting in infants at the time of complementary feeding. Food Quality and Preference. 2016; 48: 228-237.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Barrett KJ, Flesher A, Moding KJ, Johnson SL. Characterizing Caregiver Verbalizations to Infants During the Introduction of a Novel Food. Current Developments in Nutrition. 2021; 5(Supplement_2): 716-716.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

22-1618

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Prebiotic in Preterm Infants
NCT03306316 COMPLETED NA
Early Allergen System Experience
NCT06262867 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA