Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
1110 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-03-07
2026-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study investigates the effectiveness of introducing common allergens to infants with the goal of preventing food allergies. The study will enroll 1,100 infants stratified by their risk of developing a food allergy who are assigned to either receive Ready. Set. Food! supplements or follow standard allergen introduction practices recommended by their pediatrician.
The goal of this study is to assess how Ready. Set. Food! allergen introduction supplements improve the experience of parents introducing allergens, decrease healthcare costs related to food allergies, and decrease food allergy prevalence.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Introduction and Maintenance of Still Eating Protein Blends in Support of Infant Nutritional Goals
NCT03667118
A Growth and Hypoallergenicity Study of a New Formula for Infants With Cow Milk Allergy
NCT00664768
Individualized Nutrition to Optimize Preterm Infant Growth and Neurodevelopment
NCT06266455
Growth, Risks of Allergy and Metabolic Syndrome in 6 Year Old Children Born Preterm Compared to Postdischarge Nutrition
NCT02078687
Impact of Infant Formula on Resolution of Cow's Milk Allergy
NCT02719405
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Several randomized, controlled trials have investigated early allergen introduction to prevent food allergy. The Learning Early About Peanut (LEAP) study demonstrated a significant reduction in peanut allergy by introducing peanuts early, irrespective of baseline sensitization. Follow-up indicated sustained risk reduction. The Enquiring About Tolerance (EAT) trial explored the early introduction of multiple allergens, showing a lower relative risk of food allergy, particularly peanut and egg allergy in infants who were regularly fed the allergens. The Prevention of Egg Allergy in High-Risk Infants with Eczema (PETIT) study focused on egg introduction, revealing a preventive effect with gradual, consistent consumption. The Strategy for Prevention of Milk Allergy by Daily Ingestion of Infant Formula in Early Infancy (SPADE) study highlighted that early ingestion of cow's milk formula reduced cow's milk allergy risk. Early Food Intervention and Skin Emollients to Prevent Food Allergy in Young Children (PreventADALL), a multicenter trial, combined skin and food interventions, demonstrating a reduced food allergy at 36 months. Government bodies and professional societies, including National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology (AAAAI), American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology (ACAAI), and Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (CSACI), recommend early allergen introduction based on these trials.
Guidelines advise introducing peanut and other allergenic foods by 6 months, avoiding delays, especially for high-risk infants with severe eczema or egg allergy. The PreventADALL trial supported early exposure to allergenic foods to prevent food allergy. The Center for Disease Control (CDC) reported varying ages of complementary food introduction in the U.S., with a prevalence of early introduction before 4 months. Despite guidelines, low adherence rates were observed in the PreventADALL trial.
Safety of Introducing Food to Infants:
Infant anaphylaxis is rare, with allergic infants typically presenting with mild to moderate symptoms. Clinical trials and real-world studies demonstrated low rates of severe reactions, even in higher-risk infants. Recent guidelines focus on early, regular allergen ingestion, emphasizing the safety of introducing potentially allergenic foods to infants.
Study Rationale:
The trials promoting early allergen introduction face challenges in widespread adoption due to the difficulty of maintaining feeding requirements. In the case of LEAP, parents were contacted 104 times throughout the study to ensure compliance. For the EAT study, only 43% of parents could maintain the feeding requirements, which included large amounts of solid foods for infants who had not started eating otherwise, and some had difficulties doing so. Consumption levels were a critical factor for the EAT study: the reduction in food allergy was only shown to be statistically significant in the group of families who could maintain a certain level of compliance. The data from LEAP and EAT indicate that ingestion of 2 grams of protein per week of the allergenic food was required to decrease the risk of food allergy. Ingesting 2 grams of protein per week of allergenic food is crucial. Early introduction, before 6 months, is vital, but a method for infants not developmentally ready for solids is needed.
Ready. Set. Food! Stage 1 and 2 Mix-ins address these challenges with a patented direct-to-consumer product introducing top pediatric allergens in stages. It covers cow's milk, egg, and peanut, representing over 80% of childhood food allergies. The regimen, dissolved in a bottle of breast milk or formula, follows a sequential introduction process, replicating home food introduction. The formulation aims to promote tolerance development via the gastrointestinal system, aligning with prevention trials. Over 150,000 infants have used Ready. Set. Food! and in preliminary assessments of consumers, more than 95% achieved the clinically recommended duration with very few allergic reactions.
The study design was created to mimic the real-world environment in which caregivers would introduce allergens to their infants. Therefore, the study design avoids in-person visits with the study team and prescriptive requirements for testing and evaluation. Due to the nature of the study, blinding the interventional group would not replicate a real-world environment. In addition, an unblinded study allows caregivers to seek additional information and support, such as they would in a real-world environment, and make decisions based on the early allergen introduction they have completed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
Participants randomized to the intervention group will receive an early allergen introduction supplement.
Ready. Set. Food! Stage 1 Mix ins
These supplements contain cow's milk, eggs, and peanuts.
Control
Participants randomized to the control group will follow the guidance of their pediatrician.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ready. Set. Food! Stage 1 Mix ins
These supplements contain cow's milk, eggs, and peanuts.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Infant will be 2-5 months old at the time of study enrollment
* Able to participate in the study under the supervision of a caregiver or legal guardian -who must be:
1. At least 18 years of age
2. The caregiver or legal guardian of the infant
3. Living with the infant for the duration of the study
4. Willing to follow all caregiver responsibilities
5. Willing and able to sign the electronic Informed Consent
6. Willing to conform to all protocol requirements (e.g., completion of study questionnaires and procedures, and reporting of AEs)
* Caregiver or legal guardian who owns a functioning smartphone device, has access to an internet connection (Wi-Fi or data plan), and is willing to download the study app
Exclusion Criteria
* Participating in a clinical trial and/or treated with any investigational product within 3 months preceding the first dose of study product.
* Clinically significant medical conditions such as cardiac disease or lung disease, and/or babies who have bloody stools that have required milk elimination that are unstable or uncontrolled and may interfere with a participant's participation in the study in the opinion of the medically qualified investigator.
* Other severe, acute or chronic, medical or psychiatric condition(s) or laboratory abnormality(ies) that may increase the risk associated with study participation or intervention product administration or may interfere with the interpretation of study results, and in the judgment of the medically qualified investigator, would make the participant inappropriate for entry into this study.
* Preterm delivery (\<37 weeks \[259 days\] gestational age).
* Admission to the neonatal unit ≥ 3 days for issues other than establishment of normal feeding.
* Chronic use of antibiotics (≥ 28 consecutive days)
* Evidence of a baseline illness that would, in the opinion of the PI, introduce a significant safety concern if the infant is enrolled in the study or otherwise preclude study participation.
* Significant birth defect/complication that would, in the opinion of the PI, create a safety concern or otherwise confound the study (e.g., abdominal wall defects, congenital heart disease).
* Medical condition (infant) that, in the opinion of the PI, may significantly alter gut microbiota or healthy immune responses.
* Maternal infection with human immunodeficiency virus, tuberculosis, hepatitis C, or hepatitis B.
* Caregiver condition that, in the opinion of the PI, would not allow the Caregiver and/or infant to comply with the study protocol requirements.
* History of immunocompromised conditions. Is related to persons involved directly or indirectly with the conduct of this study (i.e., PI, sub-investigators, study coordinators, other study personnel, employees of Ready. Set. Food! contractors of Ready. Set. Food! and the families of each).
2 Months
5 Months
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
ObvioHealth
INDUSTRY
Prollergy dba Ready Set Food
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kara McNamara, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
ObvioHealth
Vikram Garg, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Curavit
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Virtual Site Location - Curavit
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ReadySetFood
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.