Trauma Resuscitation With Low-Titer Group O Whole Blood or Products

NCT ID: NCT05638581

Last Updated: 2025-08-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-07-27

Study Completion Date

2027-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of unseparated whole blood (referred to as Low-Titer Group O Whole Blood) and the separate components of whole blood (including red cells, plasma, platelets, and cryoprecipitate) in critically injured patients who require large-volume blood transfusions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Trauma is one of the leading causes of death in the United States, and disproportionately affects the young, killing those who might otherwise have lived long and productive lives. Injuries account for more years of potential life lost before age 75 than any other cause. Hemorrhage remains the most common cause of preventable death after injury, and blood transfusion is an essential part of treatment. Modern blood banking practices separate donated whole blood into components. The current standard of care in trauma transfusion is the balanced administration of equal numbers of units of blood components (packed red blood cells, plasma, and platelets), effectively attempting to reconstitute whole blood. A renewed approach to blood transfusion therapy in trauma is to use whole blood from the outset, which has not been separated. Compared with component therapy, whole blood offers several potential advantages, but there are only a small number of, mostly observational, studies comparing whole blood and component therapy, and they are very heterogeneous.

The TROOP trial will include injured adults with hemorrhagic shock anticipated to require massive blood transfusions, who will be randomized to receive either whole blood (LTOWB) or blood components. This will allow a direct comparison to see if one type of transfusion is more strongly associated with improved clinical outcomes over the other.

The knowledge gained from this clinical trial will transform the way in which massively bleeding trauma patients are transfused. The trial is exceedingly well positioned to improve mortality from trauma and reduce the number of preventable deaths resulting from hemorrhagic shock.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Wounds and Injuries Shock, Hemorrhagic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Care providers will be blinded to assignment until the point of randomization, which is when the cooler is opened, in the trauma bay, to remove blood products for transfusion.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

LTOWB

Participants randomized to receive (Low Titer O Whole Blood \[LTOWB\])

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

LTOWB

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Participants will receive Low Titer O Whole Blood administered intravenously or intraosseously.

Components

Participants randomized to receive the component blood products.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Components

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Participants will receive separated blood components (i.e., units of red cells, plasma, platelets, and cryoprecipitate) co-administered intravenously or intraosseously.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

LTOWB

Participants will receive Low Titer O Whole Blood administered intravenously or intraosseously.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Components

Participants will receive separated blood components (i.e., units of red cells, plasma, platelets, and cryoprecipitate) co-administered intravenously or intraosseously.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Adult trauma patient (estimated age \> 15 or weight \> 50 kg, if age unknown)
2. Patient taken to trauma center directly from scene
3. Commencement of blood transfusion (PRBC, plasma or LTOWB), in pre-hospital or in-hospital setting
4. Activation of site-specific Massive Hemorrhage Protocol or Massive Transfusion Protocol
5. Traumatic injury with at least one of the following:

1. Confirmed or suspected acute major bleeding
2. Assessment of Blood Consumption (ABC) Score ≥2

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients who have received, prehospital or in-hospital more than two units of LTOWB; the equivalent in components (two units of packed red blood cells and two units of plasma); or a combination of the two (more than one unit of LTOWB, one unit of packed cells, and one unit of plasma). Most trauma centers hold two units of either packed red blood cells (with two units of plasma) or two units of LTOWB in the emergency department. This stock is used to initiate transfusion, while the massive hemorrhage protocol is activated from the blood bank.
2. Patients transferred from another hospital
3. Children \<15 years (in most communities, patients aged 15-18 years are treated at adult trauma centers, and patients in this age group frequently suffer life-threatening injuries, and will therefore be included)
4. Known prisoners, defined as individuals involuntarily confined or detained in a penal institution (including juvenile detention, involuntary psychiatric commitment, or court-ordered residential substance abuse treatment)
5. Moribund patients expected to die within 1 hour
6. Patients who required an ED thoracotomy or received more than 5 consecutive minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (prior to receiving randomized blood products)
7. Patients with known "do not resuscitate" orders prior to randomization
8. Patients who refuse the administration of blood products
9. Individuals with a research "opt out" bracelet.
10. Greater than 20% total body surface area (TBSA) burns
11. Suspected inhalation injury victims
12. Patients who are obviously pregnant on clinical examination or known to be pregnant as provided by the subject or legally authorized representative
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Alabama at Birmingham

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jan O. Jansen

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jan Jansen, MBBS, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama at Birmingham, UAB Hospital

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Los Angeles County + University of Southern California (LAC + USC) Medical Center

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

University Medical Center New Orleans LCMC Health

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

University of Maryland Medical Center

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Washington University School of Medicine

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

University of Cincinnati Medical Center

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Oregon Health and Sciences University Hospital

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Penn Presbyterian Medical Center

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

University of Texas Health Science Center Houston

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

University of Texas Health San Antonio and University Health System

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Harborview Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Froedtert Hospital

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Shannon Stephens, EMTP, CCEMTP

Role: CONTACT

205-934-5890

Kiran Mansoor, MBBS

Role: CONTACT

713-500-9643

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jonah Celeski

Role: primary

Emily Turner

Role: backup

Robbie Jones

Role: primary

Devin Wakefield

Role: backup

Laura Hennessy

Role: primary

Allison Larimore

Role: backup

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jansen JO, Pedroza C, Novelo LL, Hao T, DeWildt GR, Coton CF, Mansoor K, Stephens SW, Marques MB, Stubbs JR, Richter JR, Wang HE, Holcomb JB, DeSantis SM. Trauma resuscitation with Low-Titer Group O Whole Blood Or Products: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial (the TROOP trial). Trials. 2025 Aug 2;26(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08971-y.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40753420 (View on PubMed)

Meizoso JP, Cotton BA, Lawless RA, Kodadek LM, Lynde JM, Russell N, Gaspich J, Maung A, Anderson C, Reynolds JM, Haines KL, Kasotakis G, Freeman JJ. Whole blood resuscitation for injured patients requiring transfusion: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 Sep 1;97(3):460-470. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004327. Epub 2024 Mar 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38531812 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://trooptrial.org

TROOP Consortium website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1UG3HL157401-01A1

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

1U24HL157310-01A1

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

1UG3HL157401-01A1

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.