Adverse Effects of Red Blood Cell Transfusions: A Unifying Hypothesis (Aim 3)

NCT ID: NCT02280655

Last Updated: 2016-04-11

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

43 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-04-30

Study Completion Date

2013-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Transfusion of red blood cells is often used in critically ill patients with low red blood cell counts to prevent disease progression and death. Recent studies suggest that the use of "aged" versus "fresh" red blood cells are associated with worse clinical outcomes. There is evidence that red blood cells work with the cells lining our blood vessels to produce a variety of substances that normally cause arteries to relax and increase blood supply. Two of these substances are called nitric oxide (NO) and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF). The investigators are trying to determine the nature of these substances in human beings when they are transfused "aged" versus "fresh" red blood cells. The purpose of the study is to test the effects of transfusing "aged" versus "fresh" red blood cells in volunteers with traditional cardiovascular risk factors (high blood pressure, diabetes, high cholesterol, and tobacco use) on 1) the degree of relaxation in the arteries and subsequent changes in blood flow, 2) blood levels of oxidant molecules, 3) inflammation, and 4) stem cells.

A similar study with healthy volunteers are further described in NCT00838331.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs) is often effective at preventing morbidity and mortality in anemic patients. In contrast, recent studies indicate that some RBC components may have functional defects ("RBC storage lesions") that actually cause morbidity and mortality when transfused. For example, patients transfused with RBCs stored \>14 days have statistically worse outcomes than those receiving "fresher" RBC units. In addition to the age of stored RBCs, the volume transfused may be important. The Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care (TRICC) study showed that specific patients whose transfusions were limited by a restrictive trigger (RBCs transfusions only when hemoglobin \[Hb\] \< 7 g/dL) had significantly better outcomes than those transfused with a more liberal trigger (\[Hb\] \< 10 g/dL Hb). This finding has been particularly difficult to understand since conventional wisdom suggests that an elevated \[Hb\] should be beneficial because it supports increased oxygen (O2) delivery. Recipient-specific factors may also contribute to the occurrence of these adverse events. Unfortunately, these events have been difficult to investigate because up to now they have existed only as "statistical occurrences" of increased morbidity and mortality in large data sets. There are currently no clinical or laboratory methods to detect or study them in individual patients.

The microcirculation is composed of a continuum of small vessels including small arterioles, capillaries, and post-capillary venules. The microcirculation represents an actively-adjusting vascular circuit that matches blood flow (and O2 delivery) to local tissue oxygen demands. While the physiologic mechanisms that match O2 delivery to local requirements are incompletely understood, endothelium-derived nitric oxide (NO) clearly plays an important role. Interestingly, recent work has revealed that in addition to transporting O2 and carbon dioxide (CO2), the RBC also controls local NO concentrations and thus may also play a surprisingly important role in regulating blood flow in the microcirculation.

Herein, the investigators bring together previously unconnected data to propose a unifying hypothesis, centered on insufficient NO bioavailability (INOBA), to explain the increased morbidity and mortality observed in some patients following RBC transfusion. In this model, variables associated with RBC units (storage time; 2,3-diphosphoglycerate (2,3-DPG) concentration) and transfusion recipients (endothelial dysfunction; hematocrit \[Hct\]) collectively lead to changes in NO levels in vascular beds. Under certain circumstances, these variables are "aligned" such that NO concentrations are markedly reduced, leading to vasoconstriction, decreased local blood flow and insufficient O2 delivery to end organs. Under these circumstances, the likelihood of morbidity and mortality escalates. The INOBA hypothesis is attractive because of its explanatory power and because it leads to a number of readily testable predictions, which will be investigated t determine the effects of transfused RBCs in patients with endothelial dysfunction due to cardiovascular disease. A non-invasive ultrasound assay will be used to test whether patients with cardiovascular disease and endothelial dysfunction (who have intrinsic defects in NO synthesis) are more susceptible to adverse effects from stored/processed RBCs (impaired in NO bioavailability) than fresh RBC units. Vasodilation and tissue oxygenation in response to transfusion will be monitored, and Framingham risk scores and cardiovascular disease biomarkers will be tested as potential predictive factors to identify patients most at risk from adverse effects of RBC transfusions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiovascular Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Storage-aged red blood cells (saRBCs)

Subjects with cardiovascular disease (CVD) received a transfusion with older stored red blood cells (RBCs) units. The units had been stored for greater than 21 days.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Storage-aged red blood cells (saRBCs) units

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Packed RBCs units stored for greater than 21 days, with a mean storage duration of 29.6 ± 4.9 days (mean ± SD)

Fresh red blood cells (RBCs)

Subjects with cardiovascular disease (CVD) received a transfusion with fresh red blood cells (RBCs) units. The units had been stored for less than 14 days.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fresh red blood cells units

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Packed RBCs units stored for less than 14 days, with a mean storage duration of 9.6 ± 3.9 days (mean ± SD)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Storage-aged red blood cells (saRBCs) units

Packed RBCs units stored for greater than 21 days, with a mean storage duration of 29.6 ± 4.9 days (mean ± SD)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Fresh red blood cells units

Packed RBCs units stored for less than 14 days, with a mean storage duration of 9.6 ± 3.9 days (mean ± SD)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Inpatient or outpatient at Emory University Hospital who's physicians have ordered a transfusion of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) of 1 or more units
* Cardiovascular risk factors (hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, hypertension, and tobacco smoking) or known cardiovascular disease) will be carefully documented for each subject

Cardiac risk factors are defined as follows:

* Hypercholesterolemia: Defined as serum low density lipoprotein cholesterol \> 140 mg/dL if not currently on lipid-lowering therapy or \> 100 mg/dL if on lipid-lowering therapy
* Diabetes: Defined as having fasting blood glucose sample of \> 126 mg/dL or a hemoglobin A1c of \> 7% or being treated with diabetes medications such as oral hypoglycemic agents, insulin sensitizing agents, or subcutaneous insulin
* Smoking: active tobacco use, 20 cigarettes per day for the past year
* Hypertension: Blood pressure of \> 140/90 or currently on anti-hypertensive medications
* Cardiovascular disease: known coronary artery disease by angiogram or documented myocardial infarction

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy
* Previous transfusion within one week.
* Inability to give informed consent
* On oral or IV nitrate therapy
* On vasopressor agents
* Active illicit drug use
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Emory University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

John D Roback

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John Roback, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Emory University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Emory University

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB00015316a

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.