Whole Blood in Trauma Patients With Hemorrhagic Shock

NCT ID: NCT05634109

Last Updated: 2025-02-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

220 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-14

Study Completion Date

2026-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to evaluate among trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock the clinical impact of hemostatic resuscitation between whole blood vs. blood components therapy in the following outcomes in a hierarchical analysis: mortality at 28 days and evolution of organ dysfunction.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Hemostatic resuscitation is a mainstay in the management of trauma patients. Factors such as blood loss and tissue injury contribute to coagulation and hemodynamic status imbalances. Hemorrhage remains a leading cause of death in trauma patients, despite advances in strategies such as damage control surgery, massive transfusion protocol, and intensive care.

Conventional therapy for hemostatic resuscitation is a blood transfusion seeking a 1:1:1 ratio of red blood cells, plasma, and platelets. However, this ratio has disadvantages in clinical practice, especially in low-resource settings. Whole blood transfusion can contribute to maintaining a physiological rate of cells, clotting factors, and hemostatic properties. Advances in the whole blood elucidated a new opportunity for its implementation in civilian trauma centers. However, the effect of initial resuscitation with whole blood in trauma patients is unclear. This study aims to determine the effect of hemostatic resuscitation using whole blood on mortality and evolution of organ dysfunction in severe trauma patients compared to blood components therapy. This clinical trial attempts to resolve the debate and uncertainty of using whole blood vs. blood components.

Study Design: An open-label, randomized, prospective, single-center and controlled trial will be performed. This study will be included prospectively randomized severe trauma patients who require a blood transfusion. Randomization can assign participants to the experimental arm, transfusing them with 3 units of whole blood. If the participant continues requiring transfusions, the second intervention of 3 units of whole blood can be administered. On the contrary, the randomization can assign to the control arm, where the participant will receive 3 red blood cell units, 3 fresh frozen plasma units, and half of a platelets apheresis, equivalent to 3 platelets units. If required, a second intervention with the same ratio can be transfused to participants.

The primary outcome is a hierarchical composite outcome based on mortality at 28 days and the evolution of organ dysfunction. Organ dysfunction will be measured as the difference in the score between the fifth and first days of the SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment). Secondary outcomes are mortality, coagulopathy profile, intensive care unit free days, length of hospital stay free days, and volumes of transfusion requirements. Safety outcomes are complications related to transfusion (anaphylaxis, acute hemolytic reaction, acute lung injury) and complications related to trauma patients (acute distress respiratory syndrome, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, acute kidney injury with or without dialysis, stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, sepsis, abdominal complications, abdominal compartment syndrome)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Trauma Trauma Injury Trauma, Multiple

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Single center, Controlled, Randomized, and Open label therapeutic trial.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Whole Blood

Leukoreduced whole blood with a platelet-sparing filter. Participants will be transfused with 3 whole blood units. If the participant requires, an additional transfusion pack composite by 3 whole blood units will be administered.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transfusion of blood products

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

The intervention will be either a) administration of 6 units of whole blood or b) administration of blood component therapy in the proportion of 6:6:6 units of red blood cells, plasma, and platelets.

Blood Components Therapy

1:1:1 ratio of red blood cells unit, plasma unit, and platelets unit. Participants will be transfused with 3 red blood cell units, 3 fresh frozen plasma units, and 3 platelets units. A second intervention with the same ratio can be transfused to participants if they require it.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Transfusion of blood products

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

The intervention will be either a) administration of 6 units of whole blood or b) administration of blood component therapy in the proportion of 6:6:6 units of red blood cells, plasma, and platelets.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Transfusion of blood products

The intervention will be either a) administration of 6 units of whole blood or b) administration of blood component therapy in the proportion of 6:6:6 units of red blood cells, plasma, and platelets.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients (\> 18 years)
* Activating institutional trauma code for trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock.
* Candidate for massive transfusion (Patient with an Assessment Blood Consumption (ABC) Score ≥ 2 or at the discretion of the treating physician)
* Concurrent availability of whole blood or blood component therapy

Exclusion Criteria

* More than 4 hours from trauma to hospital admission
* More than 2 hours from hospital admission to randomization
* Transfusion of more than one packed red blood cell unit prior to randomization.
* Patients who have undergone surgery (laparotomy, thoracotomy, or sternotomy) before hospital admission.
* In-extremis patients with devastating injuries (expected to die within 60 minutes).
* Blood group other than to O or A and positive Rh factor
* Severe traumatic brain injury in which neurosurgical intervention is futile (partial decapitation, massive intracranial hemorrhage, or transcranial gunshot wounds).
* Burns over 20% of the total body surface area.
* Suspected airway burn.
* Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) before arrival at the ED.
* CPR for more than 5 minutes before randomization.
* Do not resuscitate order.
* Incarcerated/prisoners.
* Known pregnancy in the ED.
* Patient or legal representative who refuse to participate in clinical research studies.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Pittsburgh

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Universitario del Valle Evaristo Garcia

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fundacion Clinica Valle del Lili

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alberto F Garcia, MD MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fundacion Clinica Valle del Lili

Carlos A Ordoñez, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fundacion Clinica Valle del Lili

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fundacion Clinica Valle del Lili

Cali, Valle del Cauca Department, Colombia

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Colombia

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Alberto F Garcia, MD MSc

Role: CONTACT

+576023319090 ext. 4299

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Sergio I Prada, MPA PhD

Role: primary

+57 (2) 3319090 ext. 4022

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Garcia AF, Caicedo Y, Gempeler A, Vallecilla L, Macia C, Orlas C, Fernandez MI, Lancheros-Ramirez P, Quintero M, Hernandez E, Vargas S, Cardenas-Perez L, Ariza F, Zarama V, Carvajal S, Billefals E, Sanchez A, Badiel M, Rosso F, Granados M, Albornoz LA, Puyana JC, Ospina-Tascon G, Ordonez CA. Transfusion of modified whole blood versus blood components therapy in patients with severe trauma: Randomized controlled trial protocol (WEBSTER trial). Injury. 2025 May;56(5):112173. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2025.112173. Epub 2025 Jan 23.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40087111 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1938

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pre-Hospital Use of Plasma for Traumatic Hemorrhage
NCT02303964 WITHDRAWN PHASE2/PHASE3