Pragmatic Prehospital Group O Whole Blood Early Resuscitation Trial

NCT ID: NCT03477006

Last Updated: 2021-10-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

86 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-11-20

Study Completion Date

2020-10-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Despite advances in trauma resuscitation, a paucity of therapeutic interventions are available early enough to reduce the downstream morbidity and mortality attributable to hemorrhage, shock and coagulopathy. Due to the time sensitive nature of the treatment of hemorrhage, the ideal resuscitation intervention would entail use of a blood product containing all essential hemostatic components, closest to time of injury, where prevention or reversal of the devastating downstream consequences of shock and coagulopathy can occur. This proposal will characterized the efficacy of whole blood resuscitation initiated in the prehospital setting to patients in hemorrhagic shock which represents this ideal intervention post-injury. These results will have great potential to dramatically change the way trauma resuscitation occurs today.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Traumatic injury represents an incredible health care burden in the United States and worldwide. Hemorrhage is estimated to be responsible for over 40% of all trauma-related deaths. Ongoing traumatic blood loss is complicated by the well-known 'lethal triad' of coagulopathy, hypothermia and acidosis which results in further unbridled hemorrhage. Uncontrolled bleeding, resultant shock and organ dysfunction remain the leading causes of early in-hospital mortality. Despite advances in trauma resuscitation, a paucity of therapeutic interventions are available early enough to reduce the downstream morbidity and mortality attributable to hemorrhage, shock and coagulopathy.

In-hospital resuscitation of traumatic hemorrhage has changed over the past decade. The underlying principle of current resuscitation practice focuses on preventing or reversing the effects of coagulopathy with the early use of a balanced component transfusion strategy (1:1:1 - plasma: packed red blood cells: platelets). This reconstituted strategy has also been coined 'whole blood-like' resuscitation despite being inferior compositionally to whole blood. The use of whole blood was historically the gold standard for treating hemorrhagic shock during World War I and II, prior to sweeping changes in blood banking practice. Whole blood use continues today and is thought to provide the bleeding patient the identical components they are losing with maximal resuscitative and hemostatic effects.

Recent military experiences continue to show the benefits of fresh whole blood resuscitation demonstrating significant survival and hemostatic advantages. Whole blood has also been postulated to improve microcirculatory hemodynamics, reduce the 'storage lesion' effect and minimize donor exposure risks. A recent civilian study has also demonstrated benefit using modified whole blood after arrival to the hospital where appropriate blood typing and cross matching was performed prior to transfusion. Due to the time sensitive nature of the treatment of hemorrhage, the ideal resuscitation intervention would entail use of a blood product containing all essential hemostatic components, closest to time of injury, where prevention or reversal of the devastating downstream consequences of shock and coagulopathy can occur.

Initiation of whole blood resuscitation in the prehospital setting and continued through the in-hospital phase of treatment to patients in hemorrhagic shock represents this ideal intervention post-injury. Essential to the prehospital initiation of whole blood resuscitation in the civilian population is need for it to be transfused without the need for blood typing or cross matching. Of similar importance is the need for cold storage and recycling of any unused whole blood product, allowing maximal utility of this precious resource.

Based upon the belief that early whole blood resuscitation represents the most efficacious hemostatic resuscitation product for the management of hemorrhage, the University of Pittsburgh is currently utilizing cold stored, low titer, platelet replete-leukocyte reduced, group O whole blood (LTLR-WB) for urgent release in the emergency department, without the need for blood typing or cross matching, for patients in hemorrhagic shock. The hypothesis is that the initiation of LTLR-WB resuscitation in the prehospital setting with continuation through the in-hospital acute resuscitation phase of care will significantly reduce the morbidity and mortality attributable to hemorrhagic shock post-injury as compared to standard prehospital and in-hospital resuscitation practice. Thus, a large pragmatic clinical trial is needed to definitively establish the efficacy and safety of whole blood resuscitation initiated in the prehospital setting. Only a high quality clinical trial will provide the essential evidence to justify and provide the impetus for the use of this precious blood banking resource early post-injury. Because of the challenges associated with execution of these types of large trials particularly in the prehospital setting, it is essential to establish feasibility of this approach in a pilot study and provide experience to inform a definitive large, multicenter whole blood trial. The University of Pittsburgh has a track record of prehospital interventional trials post-injury and the clinical research infrastructure to successfully execute the following this trial.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hemorrhagic Shock

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

LTLR-WB

Receiving 2 units of low titer, leucocyte reduced, platelet replete whole blood initiated in the prehospital setting during air medical transport and continued (up to 6 units of whole blood followed by standard component resuscitation) thru the early in-hospital phase of care

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Whole blood

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Low titer, group O, leukocyte reduced, platelet replete, cold stored whole blood

Standard Care

Receiving standard prehospital air medical care and standard of care component (1:1:1) trauma resuscitation thru the early in-hospital phase of care

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Whole blood

Low titer, group O, leukocyte reduced, platelet replete, cold stored whole blood

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Injured patients being transport via an air medical service with hypotension (SBP =/\< 90mmHg with tachycardia \>108 OR SBP=/\<70 without the tachycardia requirement)

Exclusion Criteria

Age \< 18 or \> 89 years

Isolated fall from standing injury mechanism

Brain matter exposed or penetrating brain injury (GSW)

CPR \> 5 mins with out ROSC

Isolated burns without evidence of traumatic injury

Isolated Drowning or Hanging

No Intravenous or Intraosseous access

Known prisoner or known pregnancy

Referral Hospital Admission

Wearing No PPOWER bracelet

Objection to study voiced by subject or family at scene
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

89 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Jason Sperry

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jason Sperry

Professor of Surgery and Critical Care Medicine

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jason Sperry, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Pittsburgh

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lorence JM, Donohue JK, Iyanna N, Guyette FX, Gimbel E, Brown JB, Daley BJ, Eastridge BJ, Miller RS, Nirula R, Harbrecht BG, Claridge JA, Phelan HA, Vercruysse G, O'Keeffe T, Joseph B, Neal MD, Sperry JL. Characterization of adverse events in injured patients at risk of hemorrhagic shock: a secondary analysis of three harmonized prehospital randomized clinical trials. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024 Jun 25;9(1):e001465. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001465. eCollection 2024.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38933603 (View on PubMed)

Guyette FX, Zenati M, Triulzi DJ, Yazer MH, Skroczky H, Early BJ, Adams PW, Brown JB, Alarcon L, Neal MD, Forsythe RM, Zuckerbraun BS, Peitzman AB, Billiar TR, Sperry JL. Prehospital low titer group O whole blood is feasible and safe: Results of a prospective randomized pilot trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 May 1;92(5):839-847. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003551. Epub 2022 Jan 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35081595 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R34HL135224

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

R34HL135224

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Fibrinogen Early In Severe Trauma StudY II
NCT05449834 RECRUITING PHASE3
Fibrinogen Early In Severe Trauma studY
NCT02745041 COMPLETED PHASE2
Finnish Prehospital Whole Blood Study
NCT05744583 RECRUITING NA