Quantification of Anastomostic Blood Flow With Fluorescence Imaging in Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT ID: NCT05627934
Last Updated: 2022-11-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
168 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-03-01
2027-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The registered leakage rate for rectal anastomosis is 10-15%. AL can be life threatening and has long-term adverse effects for the patients, with reduced quality of life, due to a poor functional result of the neo-rectum known as low anterior rectal syndrome (LARS). Fistulas to the vagina or urinary tract are other severe complications. Furthermore, AL is associated with an increased risk of reccurence1. Finally, the AL-associated morbidity is also a significant economic burden to the health care system due to prolonged hospital stay, medicine, and reoperations.
During surgery it is important to ensure optimal healing conditions for the anastomosis. The blood flow is evaluated by colour and pulsation in the mesentery.
Studies suggest that it might be easier to evaluate the perfusion using fluorescent dye. This evaluation is a subjective evaluation, based mostly on the surgeon's experience.
Assessing fluorescence by computer-based software, qICG, has been developed. But cut-off values for sufficient blood flow to diminish the risk of leakage, has not yet been defined.
Aim:
Primary objective: To establish cut-off values of qICG, where blood flow assumes sufficient for healing, and thereby reduce the risk of leakage.
Secondary objective: To identify which long-term complications grade A, B and C leakages entails on Quality of Life.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Anastomotic Leakage After Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer - Predictive Biomarkers and Rectal Blood Flow
NCT02401100
Indocyanine Green Fluorescent Imaging in Robotic Assisted Rectosigmoidal Resection; a Multicenter Assessment of Interobserver Variation and Comparison With Computer-based Pixel Analysis
NCT04766060
Peritoneal Microdialysis in Patients Undergoing Low Anterior Resection for Rectum Cancer
NCT01062334
Peritoneal Microdialysis in Patients Undergoing Low Anterior Resection (LAR) for Recto-sigmoid Cancer
NCT00271986
Healing of Rectal Anastomosis Sealed With a Concentrate Derived From the Patient's Blood, After Rectal Cancer Surgery
NCT05293054
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
These questionnaires will be repeated post-operatively on POD 365.
ICG and anastomotic evaluation Patient characteristics will be noted according to registration form 1. All patients must undergo laparoscopic or robotic rectal resection, possibly combined with trans-anal approach. After the bowel has been resected and the anvil of the circular stapler has been placed in the proximal bowel, the ICG-FI evaluation will take place.
The surgeon will place the camera in a stationary holder or in the robotic arm at the optimal position to view the bowel perfusion. The camera, patient, operating table, or bowel shall not be moved during observation.
A bolus of 0,2mg/kg ICG, max 25mg, is administered intravenously and flushed with saline. The laparoscopic light is switched from white to infra-red and then the ICG-solution is infused. This procedure will be video-documented.
When the anastomosis has been established, leakage-test and visual evaluation will be performed. All intra-operative observations will be registered according to registration form 2.
Postoperative observation Patients will be observed daily according to standard post-operative care. On post-operative day (POD) 5 an abdominal CT scan with rectal enema will be performed to identify all AL, including subclinical. Findings will be registered according to registration form 3. If we find a leakage on CT, a flexible endoscopy will be performed (observations will be registered according to registration form 4). Findings will be addressed according to normal practice in participating centres; surgery, endoscopic lavage, treatment with endosponge and/or antibiotics.
On POD 30 and 90, any complications will be noted from the electronic patient records, according to registration form 5.
Pre-operative and on POD 365 the patients will be sent a questionnaire or online survey about their functional symptoms and quality of life, using the validated EORTC-qlq-cr29 questionnaire and the LARS score.
q-ICG: Videos will postoperatively be analysed using the pixel analysis software q-ICG. We will evaluate the following parameters: Slope, normalized slope, TTP (Time-To-Peak=Tmax), T0 (first fluorescent sign), T1/2max, TR (Time Ratio: T1/2max/Tmax), and Fmax (Maximum fluorescent value), see registration form 6.
Videos should be recorded in MP4 format or AVI format.
Patient related data, findings and questionnaires will be entered into a RedCap database powered by OPEN - Open Patient data Explorative Network
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
qICG
Evaluation of bowel fluorescence by pixel software, qICG
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
OTHER
Vejle Hospital
OTHER
Odense University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mark Ellebaek, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Consultant Surgeon
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Odense University Hospital
Odense, Fyn, Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PL3
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.