Inflammation After Laparoscopic Robot-assisted Surgery for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
NCT ID: NCT04324567
Last Updated: 2023-04-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
55 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-10-09
2022-03-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Retrospective Study of Surgical Complications in Patients With Defunctioning Stoma After Low Anterior Resection (LAR)
NCT04359498
Prospective Randomised Study Comparing Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery in Patients With Rectal Cancer
NCT00782457
Reconstruction After Abdominoperineal Resection With Robot-assisted Harvest of VRAM Flap
NCT05689775
RObotic Versus LAparoscopic Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT01736072
A Trial to Assess Robot-assisted Surgery and Laparoscopy-assisted Surgery in Patients With Mid or Low Rectal Cancer
NCT01423214
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Laparoscopic surgery in LARC has been limited because of difficult dissection with straight instruments outside the normal anatomical planes in the confined space of the pelvis. However, recent papers report on better feasibility and good results in robot-assisted surgery for LARC. In respect to shorter postoperative length of stay for minimally invasive compared to open surgery, reduced inflammation may be the explanation, however, results are not conclusive. Most studies comparing open to minimally invasive surgery in colorectal cancer have had conventional laparoscopy as the minimally invasive group, including studies comparing inflammation after surgery. A study on inflammation after laparoscopic robot-assisted major surgery for bladder cancer has recently been published, but to our knowledge no comprehensive studies have been done with patients with rectal cancer resections. Additionally, there are claims that excessive and/or dysregulated inflammatory response after cancer surgery, worsen oncologic outcome. The need to characterize the inflammatory response after laparoscopic robot-assisted surgery of rectal cancer is thus highly relevant and needed.
The investigators want to analyse inflammatory parameters in plasma and peritoneal fluid in patients undergoing robot-assisted and open surgery for LARC.
Microdialysis is a technique which enables close to real-time monitoring of the tissues and organs of interest. The investigators want to utilize the microdialysis method to describe and monitor metabolic and inflammatory parameters in some patients after extensive robot-assisted oncological surgery for LARC.
The investigators hypothesize inflammatory response differ between patients undergoing open versus robot-assisted surgery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
APR-open
Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant (chemo-) radiotherapy (CRT) and operated with abdominoperineal resection (APR) with laparotomy.
No interventions assigned to this group
APR-robot
Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant (chemo-) radiotherapy (CRT) and operated with abdominoperineal resection (APR) with laparoscopic robot assisted technique.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* operation with APR with laparoscopic robot assisted technique.
* have accepted and signed the consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Oslo
OTHER
Oslo University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ebbe Billmann Thorgersen
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ebbe B Thorgersen, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Surgeon, The Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Norwegian Radium Hospital Oslo University Hospital
Oslo, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2019/810
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.