Workforce Mental Health Emergency Preparedness

NCT ID: NCT05621603

Last Updated: 2024-02-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

519 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-11-02

Study Completion Date

2023-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

School leaders, staff, and teachers are tasked with keeping children safe from acts of violence, natural hazards and other emergencies while encouraging learning. Disaster plans are often developed without teacher involvement, resulting in limited knowledge of emergency preparedness, undermining buy-in and limited motivation to comply with safety protocols, including disaster drills. The lack of initial consultation and limited decision-making authority can also be sources of stress for teachers. Teachers and staff may experience anxiety about their roles and responsibilities in a crisis. This research project proposes that the key to enhancing emergency preparedness in this population is to incorporate 'psychological preparedness' within a disaster management framework. In other words, to provide the school workforce with awareness of their likely psychological response to threat and coping skills/strategies for management of that response. Importantly, workforce-focused mental health integrated approaches to emergency preparedness are likely to work best if implemented via peer support and shared leadership frameworks. This project involves adaptation and implementation of an integrated workforce mental health intervention into Pre-K-12 school emergency preparedness via shared leadership and peer support. This includes co-creating training curriculum with Pre-K-12 schools, labor organizations, and district officials, implementing and evaluating the impact of the intervention. A matched waitlist control comparison research design will be used with six Pre-K-12 schools. The hypothesized outcomes of the intervention are increases in H1: emergency preparedness climate; emergency preparedness specific H2: shared leadership; H3: peer support and social cohesion; H4: confidence (in emergency preparedness); and H5: psychological preparedness. The project also anticipates H6: increases in overall mental health and well-being, and H7: a reduction in emergency preparedness-specific burnout.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The burden of poor physical and mental health is high in the Pre-K-8 school workforce. While school employees had lower than average non-fatal occupational injury and illness rates overall in 2019, they had significantly higher rates of injury due to violence (35.5 per 10,000 FTEs vs overall 4.4 per 10,000 FTEs; R100).In addition, mental health needs are higher among teachers than the general population and are a contributing factor to burnout and teacher/staff turnover. Recent estimates of the burden of the COVID-19 pandemic has shed light on the impact that an emergency can have on the education sector workforce, with teachers feeling ill-equipped to adapt to increased expectations associated with safety protocols, online learning and student mental health. Thus, there is an urgent need to enhance emergency preparedness amongst the schools' workforce and a specific need to ensure that they can respond to the needs of others while maintaining their own mental health.

Nearly all public schools have emergency preparedness plans in place. However, disaster plans are often developed at the district level without teacher and staff involvement. This can result in limited knowledge of emergency preparedness and can undermine buy-in and decrease motivation to comply with safety protocols, including disaster drills. Furthermore, the lack of initial consultation and limited decision making authority can be a source of stress among teachers. Teachers and staff may experience anxiety about their roles and responsibilities in a crisis, including keeping themselves and children safe and managing expectations from parents and other stakeholders. It is reasonable to expect some teachers and staff to have strong reactions to drills for active shooter events, weather emergencies and/or disease outbreaks. Staff with a history of trauma exposure, at the school of elsewhere, may be especially vulnerable. Investigators propose that the key to enhancing emergency preparedness in this population is to incorporate 'psychological preparedness' within a disaster management framework. In other words, to provide the school workforce with awareness of their likely psychological response to threat and coping skills/strategies for management of that response. Importantly, such workforce-focused mental health integrated approaches to emergency preparedness are likely to work best if implemented via peer support and shared leadership frameworks. Such approaches have the potential to enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of existing efforts.

Investigators hypothesize that a half-day training intervention for Pre-K-12 schools that emphasizes integration of psychological preparedness with emergency preparedness, via shared leadership and peer support, will increase - H1: the emergency preparedness climate; H2: shared leadership for emergency preparedness; H3: peer support and social cohesion associated with emergency preparedness; H4: confidence (in emergency preparedness); and H5: psychological preparedness. Investigators also hypothesize that investigators will observe (H6) an increase in overall mental health and wellbeing, and a reduction in (H7) emergency preparedness-specific burnout. Thus, the impact of this intervention will be on the school workforce's capability to respond to emergencies while maintaining their well-being.

Specific Aim 1: Adapt and implement an integrated workforce mental health intervention into Pre-K-8 school emergency preparedness via shared leadership and peer support.

* Review emergency preparedness plans/drills and mental health supports at 6 Pre-K-12 schools
* Co-create training curriculum with participating schools and district officials (N = 64, 6 focus groups with 36 participants and 28 interview participants) Specific Aim 2: Evaluate the impact of a half day mental health integrated emergency preparedness intervention in Pre-K-12 schools via shared leadership and peer support.
* Matched waitlist control comparison with 6 Pre-K-12 schools (N = 300) in a diverse school district. Data collected for all 6 schools at baseline, and two time points following the intervention.

The output of our project will be a curriculum manual and online toolkit for schools, including the resources necessary for schools to independently assess, implement and evaluate baseline levels of key outcomes and the impact of training content. Resources will be developed and disseminated to schools with the assistance of the Outreach Core, which has proven experience working with 15 school districts in our region. This project addresses NIOSH Emergency Preparedness and Response Cross-Sector Program Goal concerning safety climate (#1) and will specifically address two NIOSH NORA Healthy Work Design \& Well-being objectives: #4: Reduce work organization-related chronic health conditions among workers and #6: Improve the safety, health, and well-being of workers through healthier work design and better organizational practices.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mental Health Burnout, Psychological

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

We will employ a matched waitlist control comparison design. Schools (6) will be randomly assigned to either the training arm or the control arm. Schools assigned to the control arm will eventually receive the training.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Training

Participants receive the intervention, which is a training program.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The proposed intervention for the school workforce draws on a mental health integrated disaster preparedness model, emphasizing peer support, developed and used successfully by our team working with communities experiencing multiple disasters.

The 3 hour training is comprised of 4 modules - Module 1: Emergency Preparedness Module 2: Psychological Preparedness Module 3: Peer Support Module 4: Shared Leadership and Feedback Session

Control

Participants do NOT receive the intervention, which is a training program. This is a waitlist control comparison model.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Training

The proposed intervention for the school workforce draws on a mental health integrated disaster preparedness model, emphasizing peer support, developed and used successfully by our team working with communities experiencing multiple disasters.

The 3 hour training is comprised of 4 modules - Module 1: Emergency Preparedness Module 2: Psychological Preparedness Module 3: Peer Support Module 4: Shared Leadership and Feedback Session

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Pre-K-12 schools, including school leadership, teacher, and staff

Exclusion Criteria

* Schools other than Pre-K-12

Only adults are enrolled in this workforce-focused study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH/CDC)

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Colorado School of Public Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Courtney Welton-Mitchell

Clinical Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Courtney Welton-Mitchell, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Colorado School of Public Health

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

21-4190

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

New Technology and Child Health
NCT02622035 COMPLETED NA
Effectiveness of the Educator Well-being Program
NCT05641987 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
COVID-19 and Mental Health
NCT04407195 COMPLETED