Study of a Learning Collaborative to Implement Health Promotion in Mental Health

NCT ID: NCT03891368

Last Updated: 2021-10-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

55 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-11-26

Study Completion Date

2022-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Healthcare organizations have increasingly formed quality-improvement Learning Collaboratives to improve care for specific populations; however, there are few data on the effectiveness of this strategy compared to conventional training approaches. The primary aim of this cluster randomized implementation trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of a virtual learning collaborative (VLC) in the implementation of a lifestyle intervention for persons with serious mental illness (SMI) in routine mental health settings, compared to typical implementation consisting of site training and one-on-one individual technical assistance (TA). The investigators hypothesize that VLC compared to TA will be associated with greater Program Participation, Program Fidelity, and a greater proportion of participants achieving clinically significant weight loss.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Despite the existence of a variety of evidence-based health promotion practices, it is not well documented how to effectively transform community mental health organizations to embrace wellness as central to their mission and services. Healthcare organizations have increasingly formed quality-improvement Learning Collaboratives to improve care for specific populations; however, there are few data on the effectiveness of this strategy compared to conventional training approaches. The primary aim of this cluster randomized implementation trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of a virtual learning collaborative (VLC) in the implementation of a lifestyle intervention for persons with serious mental illness (SMI) in routine mental health settings, compared to typical implementation consisting of site training and one-on-one individual technical assistance (TA). Forty-eight mental health provider organizations from across the United States providing behavioral health services to people with SMI will be recruited to participate in collaboration with the National Council for Behavioral Health. The evidence-based practice to be implemented is the InSHAPE health coaching intervention for persons with SMI. Sites will be stratified by size and randomized to receive an 18-month intensive group-based VLC with monthly learning sessions or individual technical assistance with four scheduled conference calls over 18 months. Sites will be enrolled in three blocks of 16 sites each. The investigators will compare implementation VLC to TA with respect to service outcomes, implementation outcomes, and participant outcomes:

Aim 1 (Service Outcomes): Compare the effectiveness of VLC to TA with respect to Program Participation as measured by the proportion of enrolled individuals who received an adequate exposure to the evidence-based practice, as defined by attending at least 50% of the InSHAPE Health Mentor sessions over 6 months.

(H1) Hypothesis: VLC compared to TA will be associated with greater Program Participation.

Aim 2 (Implementation Outcomes): Compare VLC to TA with respect to Program Fidelity as measured by the InSHAPE Fidelity Scale.

(H2) Hypothesis: VLC compared to TA will be associated with greater Program Fidelity.

Aim 3 (Participant Outcomes): Compare VLC to TA with respect to adult participants with SMI enrolled in the InSHAPE program achieving clinically significant weight loss (≥5% weight loss).

(H3) Hypothesis: VLC compared to TA will be associated with a greater proportion of InSHAPE participants achieving clinically significant weight loss.

Secondary aims:

The investigators will also examine the following exploratory hypotheses: VLC compared to TA will result in (E1) more rapid Full Program Operation; (E2) greater Program Uptake; (E3) significantly improved participant health behaviors of physical activity and nutrition; and (E4) greater likelihood of Program Sustainability at 24 months. The investigators will also explore (E5) the effect of Organizational Change and VLC fidelity on Program Participation, and (E6) agency participation and adherence to the core elements of a Learning Collaborative as a predictor of InSHAPE program participation, InSHAPE program fidelity, and participant weight outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Health Promotion Obesity Organizational Innovation Mental Health Services

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Virtual Learning Collaborative

The virtual learning collaborative (VLC) is an 18-month intensive training, skill building, and structured implementation process focused on reinforcing fidelity to the InSHAPE model.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Virtual Learning Collaborative

Intervention Type OTHER

InSHAPE teams consisting of health mentors, supervisors, and senior leaders from each mental health agency randomized to the VLC will be invited to attend an in-person initial kick-off meeting followed by once per month 90-minute VLC sessions. The VLC is organized into three stages: Prework, Action, and Continuous Improvement. VLC faculty, including interventionists with expertise in implementation science, quality improvement, and subject matter (i.e., InSHAPE) experts, will facilitate VLC sessions following a structured protocol to standardize the planning and execution of the VLC across three cohorts enrolled in the study.

Technical Assistance

The technical assistance (TA) condition includes four scheduled conference calls between an InSHAPE expert TA "coach" and the agency's InSHAPE team, with the option for sites to request additional calls as needed through 18-months post-randomization.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Technical Assistance

Intervention Type OTHER

Scheduled calls will occur at 1 month, 2 months, 8 months, and 14 months following their participation in initial InSHAPE training following randomization and follow a structured protocol. At the end of each scheduled conference call, the coach will schedule the next call with the site.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Virtual Learning Collaborative

InSHAPE teams consisting of health mentors, supervisors, and senior leaders from each mental health agency randomized to the VLC will be invited to attend an in-person initial kick-off meeting followed by once per month 90-minute VLC sessions. The VLC is organized into three stages: Prework, Action, and Continuous Improvement. VLC faculty, including interventionists with expertise in implementation science, quality improvement, and subject matter (i.e., InSHAPE) experts, will facilitate VLC sessions following a structured protocol to standardize the planning and execution of the VLC across three cohorts enrolled in the study.

Intervention Type OTHER

Technical Assistance

Scheduled calls will occur at 1 month, 2 months, 8 months, and 14 months following their participation in initial InSHAPE training following randomization and follow a structured protocol. At the end of each scheduled conference call, the coach will schedule the next call with the site.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Provide outpatient behavioral health services to people with SMI as defined by primary DSM-V Axis I diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder or any other state-certified serious mental illness diagnosis (e.g., post-traumatic stress disorder)
* Agree to study procedures including a commitment by CEO or designee to: (a) participate over the full program, including randomization to VLC or TA; (b) engage (if randomized to VLC) in monthly web-based meetings with other VLC members, including sharing implementation outcome data and performance evaluations; (c) collect and submit aggregate participant-level data, including demographics, weight/BMI, physical fitness as measured by a 6-minute walk test, waist circumference, frequency of physical activity, and self-reported changes in nutrition; and (d) participate in phone-based organizational change and implementation assessments, including organization leadership, middle management, and InSHAPE staff.


* Age 18 or older
* SMI as defined by primary DSM-V Axis I diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder or any other state-certified SMI diagnosis (e.g., post-traumatic stress disorder)
* Verbal permission from participant to share de-identified data with the research team
* Overweight or obesity as indicated by BMI of 25 kg/m2 or greater
* Medical clearance for participation in an exercise and dietary medication program by a physician, physician assistant, or nurse practitioner.

Exclusion Criteria

• None
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dartmouth College

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Massachusetts General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Stephen Bartels

Director, The Mongan Institute, James J. and Jean H. Mongan Chair in Health Policy and Community Health at MGH-Harvard

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stephen Bartels, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Massachusetts General Hospital

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Aschbrenner KA, Pratt SI, Bond GR, Zubkoff L, Naslund JA, Jue K, Williams G, Kinney A, Cohen MJ, Godfrey MM, Bartels SJ. A virtual learning collaborative to implement health promotion in routine mental health settings: Protocol for a cluster randomized trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Sep;84:105816. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105816. Epub 2019 Jul 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31344520 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01MH102325

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

STUDY00028067

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

R01MH102325

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link