Process and Effect Evaluation of the Project "Aan Tafel in 1,2,3 Euro"
NCT ID: NCT05595551
Last Updated: 2023-10-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
272 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-11-01
2023-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Three types of studies will be conducted:
WP1) Process evaluation via qualitative research: focus groups and/or individual interviews with participants of Aan Tafel in 1 2 3 euro, and with delegates of the social organizations;
WP2) Effect evaluation via secondary data-analysis of purchase data retrieved from loyalty cards of participants, and of general customers (i.e., control group);
WP3) Process and effect evaluation with a control group in a baseline-post design: the intervention group are participants of the program, and the control group are clients in social organizations, but do not participate in the program.
On the one hand we want to find out if the intervention has an effect on specific determinants (i.e., food literacy, self-efficacy, attitudes, food security) of food behavior/meal prepping behavior and on meal structure of the family (i.e., amount of freshly made meals, amount of meals cooked and consumed together) (WP3), as well as on participants' food choices (WP2). On the other hand we want to find out how participans experience the program, what succes factors and barriers are, as well as how social organizations experience the program (as a partner of Colruyt, and contact person of the vulnerable families) (WP1).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Technical Assistance for Child and Adult Care Food Program in Family Child Care Home
NCT03560050
Effectiveness of Differing Levels of Support for Family Mealtimes on Obesity Prevention Among Head Start Preschools
NCT02487251
Effects of a Pre-school-based Nutritional Intervention on Children's Eating Behavior and Anthropometric Parameters
NCT01656928
Effectiveness of a Culinary Class on Food Literacy and Eating Behaviours of Francophone High School Students
NCT04605224
Evaluating a Mindful Eating Curriculum, "Savor the Flavor"
NCT04127812
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In the qualitative study (WP1), participants of the intervention, as well as representatives of social organizations will be recruited to participate in an interview and/or focus group interview. Interviews will be conducted until data saturation is reached.
In the interventional study (WP3), participants of the project (intervention condition) will be compared to participants in a control condition who do not participate in the project. A total sample size of 200 participants is calculated, based on an a priori power analysis (two groups, two measurements, α=0.05; power=0.80, ES=0.25). Participants in both conditions will complete a survey in a pre-measurement and a post-measurement, three months after the start of the intervention.
The second effect study (WP2) has a longitudinal pre-post design, and is based on secondary purchase data from 2018 until 2022. The intervention group (i.e., participants of the intervention) will be compared to a control group (i.e., not subscribed in the intervention), by using general customer data. A multilevel growth model will be used to look at each individual's different purchase moments, with data before and during the intervention. The model represents three levels: 1) point of time/purchase, 2) customer, 3) store/location.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
The intervention "Aan Tafel in 1, 2, 3 euro"
The participants use the intervention program: the recipe booklets and the provided price guarantee for their meals.
The intervention "Aan Tafel in 1, 2, 3 euro"
The participants in this group are clients of Colruyt who are subscribed to the program "Aan Tafel in 1 2 3 euro". They will receive two-weekly recipe booklets with 6 balanced and child-friendly recipes in each booklet. They are guaranteed a fixed price for each recipe, that will be given at the checkout counter, based on their loyalty card.
Control group
The participants are not registered to use the program and will be recruited in social organizations to match their sociodemographic profile as much as possible.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
The intervention "Aan Tafel in 1, 2, 3 euro"
The participants in this group are clients of Colruyt who are subscribed to the program "Aan Tafel in 1 2 3 euro". They will receive two-weekly recipe booklets with 6 balanced and child-friendly recipes in each booklet. They are guaranteed a fixed price for each recipe, that will be given at the checkout counter, based on their loyalty card.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Be a member of a family with at least one child under the age of 18 living at home.
* Being Dutch-speaking: thorough knowledge of Dutch in terms of reading/writing/speaking.
* Be over 18 years old and (regularly) responsible for the preparation of the family meals
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Ghent
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Wendy Van Lippevelde
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University Ghent
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ghent University
Ghent, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kok G, Gottlieb NH, Peters GJ, Mullen PD, Parcel GS, Ruiter RA, Fernandez ME, Markham C, Bartholomew LK. A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: an Intervention Mapping approach. Health Psychol Rev. 2016 Sep;10(3):297-312. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2015.1077155. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
Abraham C, Michie S. A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychol. 2008 May;27(3):379-87. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.3.379.
Barton KL, Wrieden WL, Anderson AS. Validity and reliability of a short questionnaire for assessing the impact of cooking skills interventions. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2011 Dec;24(6):588-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2011.01180.x. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
Fulkerson JA, Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M. Adolescent and parent views of family meals. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Apr;106(4):526-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.01.006.
Begley A, Paynter E, Dhaliwal SS. Evaluation Tool Development for Food Literacy Programs. Nutrients. 2018 Nov 2;10(11):1617. doi: 10.3390/nu10111617.
Poelman MP, Dijkstra SC, Sponselee H, Kamphuis CBM, Battjes-Fries MCE, Gillebaart M, Seidell JC. Towards the measurement of food literacy with respect to healthy eating: the development and validation of the self perceived food literacy scale among an adult sample in the Netherlands. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Jun 18;15(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0687-z.
Condrasky MD, Williams JE, Catalano PM, Griffin SF. Development of psychosocial scales for evaluating the impact of a culinary nutrition education program on cooking and healthful eating. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2011 Nov-Dec;43(6):511-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2010.09.013. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
Gulliford MC, Nunes C, Rocke B. The 18 Household Food Security Survey items provide valid food security classifications for adults and children in the Caribbean. BMC Public Health. 2006 Feb 8;6:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-26.
Vos M, Proesmans VLJ, Van Kerckhove A, Deforche B, Michels N, Poelman MP, Van Lippevelde W. Evaluation of a national supermarket intervention supporting vulnerable families in healthy meal practices: a natural experiment. BMC Med. 2025 Jul 1;23(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04210-y.
Vos M, Van Kerckhove A, Deforche B, Proesmans VLJ, Michels N, Poelman MP, Geuens M, Van Lippevelde W. Supporting vulnerable families' meal practices: process evaluation of a nationwide intervention implemented by a retailer and social organizations. BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 6;24(1):3060. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20488-8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ONZ-2022-0343
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.