Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-02-05
2024-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Participants will be randomized into three groups. The three experimental groups received either bilateral or ipsilateral rTMS, or iTBS (with contralateral sham stimulation) at suprahyoid motor cortex, while the placebo group received bilateral sham stimulation. Stimulation will be given at 5 hertz(Hz), 1000 pulses of rTMS or 600 pulses of iTBS per session, for a total of 10 sessions. The swallowing function, penetration-aspiration scale of video-fluoroscopic swallowing study, motor evoked potential of suprahyoid muscles, intraoral pressure, and ultrasound swallowing exam will be evaluated before therapy, and at 1, 3, 6 months post therapy.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Repetitive Transcranial Stimulation (rTMS) in Post Stroke Dysphagia
NCT01081444
Theta Burst Stimulation for Motor Recovery
NCT05613686
rTMS in Aphasic Patients With Neuroimage Assessments
NCT03059225
The Effect of High Frequency rTMS on Advancing Parkinson's Disease With Dysphagia
NCT03317509
rTMS Treatment of Dysphagia in Parkinson's Patients
NCT07221110
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
After damage on swallowing ability, several cause would arise risk of aspiration and one of them was inadequate hyolaryngeal elevation. Suprahyoid muscle played an important role in hyolaryngeal movement so re-training on suprahyoid muscle might be an efficient method.
Conventional treatments of dysphagia focused on restore or improve swallowing functions through oropharyngeal muscle training, swallowing maneuvers, or compensation strategy. However, the effectiveness of traditional therapy was still limited and inconsistent.
Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has gained increasing attention as a promising neuromodulation therapy which could improve neurological deficit and functional level through inducing the cortical neuroplasticity. Among NIBS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is the most widely used and delved. It has been utilized in stroke patient for promoting functional reorganization and modulate neural connection in motor and language area. In a previous network meta-analysis, we also indicated that rTMS showed the best efficacy in improving the swallowing function in acute and subacute poststroke dysphagia, when compared with transcranial direct current stimulation, surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation, and pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES). Despite of the positive results, there was still limited evidence on the effect of rTMS in chronic dysphagia and the mechanism by which rTMS improved dysphagia outcome is unclear. Specifically, whether the rTMS on a representation cortex directly increase functional gain, such as strength and contractility of the target area remained unclear. On the other hand, theta burst stimulation (TBS), consisting of continuous TBS (cTBS) and intermittent TBS (iTBS), is a new stimulation model of TMS and seemed to be helpful on motor recovery in chronic stroke. Furthermore, previous research had showed iTBS was not inferior to rTMS on the improvement of poststroke dysphagia using stimulation at suprahyoid motor cortex of affected hemisphere. In this study, we aim to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of both high frequency rTMS and iTBS applying on suprahyoid motor cortex in chronic poststroke dysphagia, and its effect on hyolaryngeal movement.
In each stage, patients with subcortical stroke will be randomized into three groups. The three experimental groups receive either bilateral or ipsilateral rTMS, or iTBS (with contralateral sham stimulation) at suprahyoid motor cortex, while the placebo group receive bilateral sham stimulation. Stimulation will be given at 5 hertz(Hz), 1000 pulses of rTMS or 600 pulses of iTBS per session, for a total of 10 sessions. The swallowing function, penetration-aspiration scale of video-fluoroscopic swallowing study, motor evoked potential of suprahyoid muscles, intraoral pressure, and ultrasound swallowing exam will be evaluated before therapy, and at 1, 3, 6 months post therapy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
bilateral rTMS
5 hertz(Hz), 1000 pulses, 90% resting motor threshold(RMT) stimulation on bilateral motor cortex of suprahyoid muscle for 15 minutes.
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation(rTMS)
5 hertz(Hz), 1000 pulses, 90% RMT stimulation; 15 minutes per session; for a total of 10 sessions
unilateral rTMS
5 hertz(Hz), 1000 pulses, 90% RMT stimulation on motor cortex of suprahyoid muscle at ipsilateral side as the lesion for 15 minutes; sham stimulation on motor cortex of suprahyoid muscle at contra-lateral side as the lesion for 15 minutes.
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation(rTMS)
5 hertz(Hz), 1000 pulses, 90% RMT stimulation; 15 minutes per session; for a total of 10 sessions
control group of rTMS
Sham stimulation on motor cortex of suprahyoid muscle at contra-lateral side as the lesion for 15 minutes.
Sham stimulation
Set-up the coil without true stimulation; 15 minutes per session; for a total of 10 sessions
bilateral iTBS
600 pulses iTBS stimulation on bilateral motor cortex of suprahyoid muscle for 15 minutes.
Intermittent Theta-burst Stimulation(iTBS)
3 pulses of stimulation delivered at 50 Hz and repeated at 5 Hz; 2s train of TBS with repetitive interval of every 10s, 70% RMT; 600 pulses in total; 15 minutes per session; for a total of 10 sessions
unilateral iTBS
600 pulses iTBS on motor cortex of suprahyoid muscle at ipsilateral side as the lesion for 15 minutes; sham stimulation on motor cortex of suprahyoid muscle at contra-lateral side as the lesion for 15 minutes.
Intermittent Theta-burst Stimulation(iTBS)
3 pulses of stimulation delivered at 50 Hz and repeated at 5 Hz; 2s train of TBS with repetitive interval of every 10s, 70% RMT; 600 pulses in total; 15 minutes per session; for a total of 10 sessions
control group of iTBS
Sham stimulation on motor cortex of suprahyoid muscle at contra-lateral side as the lesion for 15 minutes.
Sham stimulation
Set-up the coil without true stimulation; 15 minutes per session; for a total of 10 sessions
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation(rTMS)
5 hertz(Hz), 1000 pulses, 90% RMT stimulation; 15 minutes per session; for a total of 10 sessions
Intermittent Theta-burst Stimulation(iTBS)
3 pulses of stimulation delivered at 50 Hz and repeated at 5 Hz; 2s train of TBS with repetitive interval of every 10s, 70% RMT; 600 pulses in total; 15 minutes per session; for a total of 10 sessions
Sham stimulation
Set-up the coil without true stimulation; 15 minutes per session; for a total of 10 sessions
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* sustained the symptoms of dysphagia more than one month after stroke.
* Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) between 1 to 5 score
* Maintenance on sitting balance over 15 minutes
Exclusion Criteria
* Disease or trauma involved central neural system, such as Parkinson's disease, traumatic brain injury, brain tumor or multiple sclerosis
* Any disorder inducing dysphagia, such as nasopharyngeal cancer(NPC) or cervical cancer
* Metal Implants or pacemaker
* Global aphasia or cognitive impairment
* History of epilepsy
* Pregnancy
20 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Taiwan University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ming-Yen Hsiao, PHD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
Rao J, Li F, Zhong L, Wang J, Peng Y, Liu H, Wang P, Xu J. Bilateral Cerebellar Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Combined With Swallowing Speech Therapy for Dysphagia After Stroke: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled, Clinical Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2022 Jul;36(7):437-448. doi: 10.1177/15459683221092995. Epub 2022 May 16.
Yu-Lei X, Shan W, Ju Y, Yu-Han X, Wu Q, Yin-Xu W. Theta burst stimulation versus high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for poststroke dysphagia: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jan 14;101(2):e28576. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028576.
Wen X, Liu Z, Zhong L, Peng Y, Wang J, Liu H, Gong X. The Effectiveness of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Post-stroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Mar 17;16:841781. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.841781. eCollection 2022.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
202107115DINC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.