rTMS in Chronic Poststroke Dysphagia

NCT ID: NCT05590819

Last Updated: 2023-02-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-02-05

Study Completion Date

2024-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this study is to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) applying on suprahyoid motor cortex in chronic poststroke dysphagia, and its effect on hyolaryngeal movement.

Participants will be randomized into three groups. The three experimental groups received either bilateral or ipsilateral rTMS, or iTBS (with contralateral sham stimulation) at suprahyoid motor cortex, while the placebo group received bilateral sham stimulation. Stimulation will be given at 5 hertz(Hz), 1000 pulses of rTMS or 600 pulses of iTBS per session, for a total of 10 sessions. The swallowing function, penetration-aspiration scale of video-fluoroscopic swallowing study, motor evoked potential of suprahyoid muscles, intraoral pressure, and ultrasound swallowing exam will be evaluated before therapy, and at 1, 3, 6 months post therapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Swallowing dysfunction, or dysphagia, is a common complication following stroke. Although spontaneous recovery of swallowing function was seen in most patients in a time course of a few weeks to 6 months after stroke, around 50% of patients recovered slowly and had chronic dysphagia clinically. It is worth noting that dysphagia has great impact on clinical outcome, in terms of not only quality of life but also risk of severe complication such as aspiration pneumonia, malnutrition, and even death.

After damage on swallowing ability, several cause would arise risk of aspiration and one of them was inadequate hyolaryngeal elevation. Suprahyoid muscle played an important role in hyolaryngeal movement so re-training on suprahyoid muscle might be an efficient method.

Conventional treatments of dysphagia focused on restore or improve swallowing functions through oropharyngeal muscle training, swallowing maneuvers, or compensation strategy. However, the effectiveness of traditional therapy was still limited and inconsistent.

Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has gained increasing attention as a promising neuromodulation therapy which could improve neurological deficit and functional level through inducing the cortical neuroplasticity. Among NIBS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is the most widely used and delved. It has been utilized in stroke patient for promoting functional reorganization and modulate neural connection in motor and language area. In a previous network meta-analysis, we also indicated that rTMS showed the best efficacy in improving the swallowing function in acute and subacute poststroke dysphagia, when compared with transcranial direct current stimulation, surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation, and pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES). Despite of the positive results, there was still limited evidence on the effect of rTMS in chronic dysphagia and the mechanism by which rTMS improved dysphagia outcome is unclear. Specifically, whether the rTMS on a representation cortex directly increase functional gain, such as strength and contractility of the target area remained unclear. On the other hand, theta burst stimulation (TBS), consisting of continuous TBS (cTBS) and intermittent TBS (iTBS), is a new stimulation model of TMS and seemed to be helpful on motor recovery in chronic stroke. Furthermore, previous research had showed iTBS was not inferior to rTMS on the improvement of poststroke dysphagia using stimulation at suprahyoid motor cortex of affected hemisphere. In this study, we aim to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of both high frequency rTMS and iTBS applying on suprahyoid motor cortex in chronic poststroke dysphagia, and its effect on hyolaryngeal movement.

In each stage, patients with subcortical stroke will be randomized into three groups. The three experimental groups receive either bilateral or ipsilateral rTMS, or iTBS (with contralateral sham stimulation) at suprahyoid motor cortex, while the placebo group receive bilateral sham stimulation. Stimulation will be given at 5 hertz(Hz), 1000 pulses of rTMS or 600 pulses of iTBS per session, for a total of 10 sessions. The swallowing function, penetration-aspiration scale of video-fluoroscopic swallowing study, motor evoked potential of suprahyoid muscles, intraoral pressure, and ultrasound swallowing exam will be evaluated before therapy, and at 1, 3, 6 months post therapy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Deglutition Disorders

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

bilateral rTMS

5 hertz(Hz), 1000 pulses, 90% resting motor threshold(RMT) stimulation on bilateral motor cortex of suprahyoid muscle for 15 minutes.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation(rTMS)

Intervention Type DEVICE

5 hertz(Hz), 1000 pulses, 90% RMT stimulation; 15 minutes per session; for a total of 10 sessions

unilateral rTMS

5 hertz(Hz), 1000 pulses, 90% RMT stimulation on motor cortex of suprahyoid muscle at ipsilateral side as the lesion for 15 minutes; sham stimulation on motor cortex of suprahyoid muscle at contra-lateral side as the lesion for 15 minutes.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation(rTMS)

Intervention Type DEVICE

5 hertz(Hz), 1000 pulses, 90% RMT stimulation; 15 minutes per session; for a total of 10 sessions

control group of rTMS

Sham stimulation on motor cortex of suprahyoid muscle at contra-lateral side as the lesion for 15 minutes.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Sham stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Set-up the coil without true stimulation; 15 minutes per session; for a total of 10 sessions

bilateral iTBS

600 pulses iTBS stimulation on bilateral motor cortex of suprahyoid muscle for 15 minutes.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intermittent Theta-burst Stimulation(iTBS)

Intervention Type DEVICE

3 pulses of stimulation delivered at 50 Hz and repeated at 5 Hz; 2s train of TBS with repetitive interval of every 10s, 70% RMT; 600 pulses in total; 15 minutes per session; for a total of 10 sessions

unilateral iTBS

600 pulses iTBS on motor cortex of suprahyoid muscle at ipsilateral side as the lesion for 15 minutes; sham stimulation on motor cortex of suprahyoid muscle at contra-lateral side as the lesion for 15 minutes.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intermittent Theta-burst Stimulation(iTBS)

Intervention Type DEVICE

3 pulses of stimulation delivered at 50 Hz and repeated at 5 Hz; 2s train of TBS with repetitive interval of every 10s, 70% RMT; 600 pulses in total; 15 minutes per session; for a total of 10 sessions

control group of iTBS

Sham stimulation on motor cortex of suprahyoid muscle at contra-lateral side as the lesion for 15 minutes.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Sham stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Set-up the coil without true stimulation; 15 minutes per session; for a total of 10 sessions

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation(rTMS)

5 hertz(Hz), 1000 pulses, 90% RMT stimulation; 15 minutes per session; for a total of 10 sessions

Intervention Type DEVICE

Intermittent Theta-burst Stimulation(iTBS)

3 pulses of stimulation delivered at 50 Hz and repeated at 5 Hz; 2s train of TBS with repetitive interval of every 10s, 70% RMT; 600 pulses in total; 15 minutes per session; for a total of 10 sessions

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham stimulation

Set-up the coil without true stimulation; 15 minutes per session; for a total of 10 sessions

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age \> 20 years old, diagnosed of subcortical stroke(including ischemic or hemorrhagic type) by CT or MRI image study
* sustained the symptoms of dysphagia more than one month after stroke.
* Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) between 1 to 5 score
* Maintenance on sitting balance over 15 minutes

Exclusion Criteria

* Disturbed consciousness, unable to communicate and obey order through gesture or language
* Disease or trauma involved central neural system, such as Parkinson's disease, traumatic brain injury, brain tumor or multiple sclerosis
* Any disorder inducing dysphagia, such as nasopharyngeal cancer(NPC) or cervical cancer
* Metal Implants or pacemaker
* Global aphasia or cognitive impairment
* History of epilepsy
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Taiwan University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ming-Yen Hsiao, PHD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ming-Yen Hsiao, PHD

Role: CONTACT

23123456 ext. 52857

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19833552 (View on PubMed)

Rao J, Li F, Zhong L, Wang J, Peng Y, Liu H, Wang P, Xu J. Bilateral Cerebellar Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Combined With Swallowing Speech Therapy for Dysphagia After Stroke: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled, Clinical Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2022 Jul;36(7):437-448. doi: 10.1177/15459683221092995. Epub 2022 May 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35574927 (View on PubMed)

Yu-Lei X, Shan W, Ju Y, Yu-Han X, Wu Q, Yin-Xu W. Theta burst stimulation versus high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for poststroke dysphagia: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jan 14;101(2):e28576. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028576.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35029231 (View on PubMed)

Wen X, Liu Z, Zhong L, Peng Y, Wang J, Liu H, Gong X. The Effectiveness of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Post-stroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Mar 17;16:841781. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.841781. eCollection 2022.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35370584 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

202107115DINC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

rTMS for Adults With Autistic Spectrum Disorder
NCT01918787 UNKNOWN PHASE1/PHASE2