rTMS in Aphasic Patients With Neuroimage Assessments

NCT ID: NCT03059225

Last Updated: 2021-01-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-02-18

Study Completion Date

2021-12-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The refinement of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has highlighted its merit in terms of learning programs as a treatment for aftereffect augmentation. Nevertheless, the efficacy of synchronous rTMS protocol integrated with computer-integrated speech training is not well understood. It is also not clear regarding the efficacy of compound bi-hemispheric stimulation protocol. The aim of the study is to investigate language response to these new strategies and to determine the longevity of the therapeutic outcome. Advanced MR neuroimaging techniques, such as fMRI and DTI, are powerful tools to evaluate the concomitant nervous changes after rTMS treatment on aphasic patients. The knowledge from fMRI and DTI microstructural evolution provides insight into underlined mechanism operating the language improvement.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The efficacy of synchronous rTMS protocol integrated with computer-integrated speech training is not well understood. It is also not clear regarding the efficacy of inhibitory or excitatory stimulation protocol. The aim of the study is to investigate language response to these new strategies and to determine the longevity of the therapeutic outcome. Advanced MR neuroimaging techniques, such as fMRI and DTI, are powerful tools to evaluate the concomitant nervous changes after rTMS treatment on aphasic patients. The knowledge from fMRI and DTI microstructural evolution provides insight into underlined mechanism operating the language improvement

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke Aphasia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental

repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) intervention of contralesional 1Hz-rTMS for 10 daily sessions.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

Intervention Type DEVICE

undergo contralesional 1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation(rTMS) or high frequency ipsilesional rTMS for 10 daily sessions

Sham stimulation

Sham treatment for 2-week inhibitory non-dominate hemisphere rTMS program.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

2-week inhibitory non-dominate hemisphere rTMS program

High frequency rTMS

High-frequency rTMS to ipsilesional region for 10 daily sessions.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

Intervention Type DEVICE

undergo contralesional 1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation(rTMS) or high frequency ipsilesional rTMS for 10 daily sessions

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

undergo contralesional 1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation(rTMS) or high frequency ipsilesional rTMS for 10 daily sessions

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham stimulation

2-week inhibitory non-dominate hemisphere rTMS program

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aphasic stroke in chronic stage (over 3 months)

Exclusion Criteria

* No seizure history, no brain surgery history, no electronic device in brain or chest, no dementia
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

vghtpe user

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Po-Yi Tsai, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of physical medicine and rehabilitation, Taipei Veterans General Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Taipei Veterans General Hospital

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Po-Yi Tsai, MD

Role: CONTACT

886-228757293

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tsai PY, Wang CP, Ko JS, Chung YM, Chang YW, Wang JX. The persistent and broadly modulating effect of inhibitory rTMS in nonfluent aphasic patients: a sham-controlled, double-blind study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Oct;28(8):779-87. doi: 10.1177/1545968314522710. Epub 2014 Feb 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24526709 (View on PubMed)

Chou TY, Wang JC, Lin MY, Tsai PY. Low-Frequency vs. Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Non-fluent Aphasia in Stroke: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Jan 14;13:800377. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.800377. eCollection 2021.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35095477 (View on PubMed)

Lee IT, Huang CC, Hsu PC, Lin CP, Tsai PY. Resting-State Network Changes Following Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Aphasia-A Randomized Controlled Study. Neuromodulation. 2022 Jun;25(4):528-537. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2021.10.004. Epub 2021 Dec 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35088736 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2014-05-003A

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

rTMS as a Treatment for PPA
NCT03406429 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1