"Evaluation of Usability and Safety of the Self-balancing Walking System Atalante in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis"
NCT ID: NCT05563402
Last Updated: 2023-06-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
15 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-09-20
2023-03-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Gait and balance disturbances in MS are common even in the early stages of the disease. Half of the patients report some alteration in the quality of walking within the first month after diagnosis, reaching 90% after 10 years of evolution. 4 5 In addition, it is the symptom to which patients give the most importance 6 and the one that most conditions their activity and participation. 7 The causes of gait disturbance are multifactorial and are influenced by different aspects such as muscle strength, balance, coordination, proprioception, vision, spasticity, fatigue and even cognitive aspects4.
There are multiple interventions, including aerobic, resistance training, yoga, and combined exercise, that have shown significant improvements in walking endurance, regardless of outcome measures (six-minute walking test (6MWT), two-minute walking test 2MWT). 8
In recent years, evidence has been growing around rehabilitation with robotic equipment in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), in their study Ye et al. concluded that robotic locomotor training has limited impact on motor functions in multiple sclerosis, but improves fatigue and spasticity, is safe and well-tolerated for PwMS, and less demanding for physical therapists.10 Bowman et al. concluded that robot-assisted gait therapy (RAGT) improves balance and gait outcomes in a clinically significant way in PwMS, RAGT appears more effective compared to non-specific rehabilitation, while showing similar effects compared to non-specific rehabilitation. specific balance and gait training in studies with level 2 evidence. RAGT has several advantages in terms of patient motor assistance, training intensity, safety and the possibility of combining other therapeutic approaches and should be promoted for PwMS with disability in a multimodal rehabilitation setting as an opportunity to maximize recovery.11 In this setting, more larger-scale and better-designed studies with longer training duration and more studies evaluating satisfaction, usability, and effectiveness are needed. of RAGT.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Technological Balance and Gait Rehabilitation in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis.
NCT05983809
Quantified Balance Measures During Stance and Gait: Multiple Sclerosis Patients. A Longitudinal Clinical Study
NCT02142946
Stabilometric Assessment of Balance Recovery in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis
NCT02131285
Effect of Robot-assisted Training on Foot Drop in Multiple Sclerosis
NCT00872053
Quantifying Gait Alteration in Multiple Sclerosis Using a Wearable Device
NCT04969848
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study protocol includes 12 one-hour RAGT training sessions for 4 weeks, three times a week, under the supervision of a qualified rehabilitation team.
Informed consent will be obtained from patients before inclusion in the study, which will be carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
With the aim of describing Usability as the main objective, and Safety as a secondary objective and functional changes at the level of balance, walking speed and quality of life.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment arm
Therefore, the investigators propose an, open, non-randomized study. This study protocol includes 12 one-hour RAGT training sessions for 4 weeks, three times a week, under the supervision of a qualified rehabilitation team.
Informed consent will be obtained from patients before inclusion in the study, which will be carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
With the aim of describing Usability as the main objective, and Safety as a secondary objective and functional changes at the level of balance, walking speed and quality of life.
Atalante
Atalante Gait training: Using the Atalante System (self-reliant walking system), participants will be secured with the appropriate sized harness and attached to an overhead body-weight support system. Each session will begin with a 3-5 minute warm-up in the continuous passive mode (cadence \~40-45 steps/minute).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Atalante
Atalante Gait training: Using the Atalante System (self-reliant walking system), participants will be secured with the appropriate sized harness and attached to an overhead body-weight support system. Each session will begin with a 3-5 minute warm-up in the continuous passive mode (cadence \~40-45 steps/minute).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Confirmed diagnosis of MS
* Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) de Kurtzke from 6.0 to 7.0
* Able to verticalize on a daily basis
* Stable course of disease-modifying therapy over the past 6 months
* Clinical comorbidity asymptomatic (i.e., no underlying cardiovascular disease)
* Height: between approximately 1.60 and 1.90 m.
* Willingness to visit the Multiple Sclerosis Center of Catalonia (CEMCAT) for testing and training.
* Gait disorder conditioned by paresis or hemiparesis associated with ataxia or sensory problems
* Patient having given written consent
Atalante is able to accommodate the following limb lengths:
* Thigh: 380-460mm
* Distance between the ground and the joint space of the knee (to be measured while wearing the shoes they intend to wear with Atalante):
* 457-607mm for patient with an ankle dorsiflexion ≥ 16°
* 457-577mm for patient with an ankle dorsiflexion between 13° et 16°
* 457-567mm for patient with an ankle dorsiflexion between 10° et 13°
* 457-557mm for patient with an ankle dorsiflexion between 0° and 10°
* Hip with less or equal to 460mm when seated
* Maximum weight:90 kg
Exclusion Criteria
* Starting or switching from fampridine (Fampyra®) in the last 4 weeks
* Height and weight outside the secure standard of safe use, described in the safety guides
* Contraindications to training with Atalante (eg, bone instability, history of osteoporosis or osteoporotic fractures)
* Subjects under Corticosteroids treatment or relapse
* Changes in disease-modifying and symptomatic therapy for MS during the study period
* Subjects with psychiatric or cognitive comorbidities that may interfere with the trial
* Whose joint centers cannot be aligned Atalante's
* Ranges of motion below:
* Knee: 5° extension, 110° flexion
* Ankle: 0° dorsiflexion, 9° plantar flexion, 18° inversion and eversion
* Hip: 115° flexion, 15° extension, 17° abduction, 10° adduction, 10°
* medial rotation, 20° lateral rotation
* Severe spasticity (greater than Ashworth 3) or uncontrolled clonus
* Severe concurrent medical diseases: infections, circulatory, heart or lung, pressure sores
* Active implantable medical device
10 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Multiple Sclerosis Center of Catalonia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Edwin Roger Meza Murillo
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Xavier Montalban, PHD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Multiple Sclerosis Center of Catalonia
Carmen Tur Gomez, PHD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Multiple Sclerosis Center of Catalonia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre d'Esclerosi Mútiple de Catalunya (Cemcat) - Barcelona, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PR(AG)285/2022
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.