Comparison Between PECS BLOCK 2 vs ESP BLOCK in Ocnologic Breast Surgery

NCT ID: NCT05558917

Last Updated: 2022-09-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

160 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-09-07

Study Completion Date

2023-11-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study aims to compare the efficacy of the two operating blocks PECS2 and ESP by measuring postoperative opioid consumption and, secondarily, to compare (between PECS and ESP) postoperative opioid consumption between surgery with/without axillary cavity dissection and with/without implantation of prosthesis or expansion

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Breast cancer is the most frequent type of cancer in the female population. Early detection is the most effective tool for improving prognosis, and the surgical approach plays a central role in the treatment of this disease. However, many are the psychophysical implications that patients face: among the main ones is postoperative and chronic pain, a symptom that greatly worsens the quality of life.

In the last decade it has been witnessed an important development of locoregional anesthesia techniques in all surgeries. In breast surgery, particularly mastectomy, the following locoregional anesthesia techniques are referred to as the Gold Standard:

1. PVB (Paravertebral Block)
2. PECS2 BLOCK (or modified PECS). For the same purposes, ESP Block (Erector Spinae Plane Block) has been applied experimentally, which has already shown its effectiveness in breast surgery in several trials.

By comparing postoperative opioid consumption between the two groups of patients, divided into PECS Block and ESP Block, the study aims to identify which anesthesia block is most effective in order to improve the care of patients undergoing mastectomy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer Breast Neoplasms Breast Carcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PECS BLOCK 2

PECS 2 (or modified PECS) is a block that involves the administration of local anesthetic under ultrasound guidance between the great pectoral and small pectoral and between the small pectoral and serratus anterior.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PECS BLOCK 2

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

With the patient supine, the linear probe will be placed in the sagittal plane slightly lateral to the hemiclavicular line ipsilateral to the surgical site. Once both muscle planes of interest have been identified, in-plane needle insertion will proceed in the cranio-caudal direction. The first local anesthetic administration with Ropivacaine 0.5% will be 20ml between small pectoralis and serratus anterior. Coming out with the needle, 10ml of Ropivacaine 0.5% will then be injected between large and small pectoral.

ESP BLOCK

ESP block is a block that involves injection of local anesthetic below the elevator muscles of the spine.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ESP BLOCK

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Positioning yourself behind the patient, lying on her side with the surgical hemilateral on top, you place the linear ultrasound probe in the sagittal plane and find the lateral margin of the transverse process. At this point, the blocking needle is inserted in the caudocranial direction and 25ml of Ropivacaine 0.5% is injected, taking care to visualize the anesthetic spread in the cranial direction.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PECS BLOCK 2

With the patient supine, the linear probe will be placed in the sagittal plane slightly lateral to the hemiclavicular line ipsilateral to the surgical site. Once both muscle planes of interest have been identified, in-plane needle insertion will proceed in the cranio-caudal direction. The first local anesthetic administration with Ropivacaine 0.5% will be 20ml between small pectoralis and serratus anterior. Coming out with the needle, 10ml of Ropivacaine 0.5% will then be injected between large and small pectoral.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ESP BLOCK

Positioning yourself behind the patient, lying on her side with the surgical hemilateral on top, you place the linear ultrasound probe in the sagittal plane and find the lateral margin of the transverse process. At this point, the blocking needle is inserted in the caudocranial direction and 25ml of Ropivacaine 0.5% is injected, taking care to visualize the anesthetic spread in the cranial direction.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients undergoing mastectomy exclusively for breast cancer
* Presence of written informed consent to the trial

Exclusion Criteria

* Bilateral breast surgery
* Previous drug use
* Chronic opioid and minor opioid therapy
* BMI \>40
* Allergy or contraindications to taking Paracetamol and Toradol
* Inability to use PCA (Patient Controlled Analgesia)
* Intraoperative opioid administration
* Patients with neuropathy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo di Alessandria

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mirco Leo, Physician

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Azienda Ospedaliera SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Azienda Ospedaliera SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo

Alessandria, Piedmont, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ASO.RianGen.22.02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Speeding Recovery From Pain and Opioid Use
NCT03388814 WITHDRAWN EARLY_PHASE1
A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT03947463 COMPLETED NA