Comparison Between PECS BLOCK 2 vs ESP BLOCK in Ocnologic Breast Surgery
NCT ID: NCT05558917
Last Updated: 2022-09-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
160 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-09-07
2023-11-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Large-scale Prospective Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Pecs II Block for Breast Surgery
NCT02544282
Opioid Free Versus Opioid Based Anaesthesia for Free Flap Reconstruction Surgery of the Breast: A Phase III Multicentric Randomized Controlled Study.
NCT05439005
Preoperative Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Paravertebral Plane Block in Decreasing Post Mastectomy Pain Syndrome
NCT06036979
Adding Morphine to ESP Block in Management of Acute PMP
NCT06175741
Impact of Erector Spinae Plane Block on Chronic Postsurgical Pain in Breast Cancer Patients
NCT05494502
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In the last decade it has been witnessed an important development of locoregional anesthesia techniques in all surgeries. In breast surgery, particularly mastectomy, the following locoregional anesthesia techniques are referred to as the Gold Standard:
1. PVB (Paravertebral Block)
2. PECS2 BLOCK (or modified PECS). For the same purposes, ESP Block (Erector Spinae Plane Block) has been applied experimentally, which has already shown its effectiveness in breast surgery in several trials.
By comparing postoperative opioid consumption between the two groups of patients, divided into PECS Block and ESP Block, the study aims to identify which anesthesia block is most effective in order to improve the care of patients undergoing mastectomy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PECS BLOCK 2
PECS 2 (or modified PECS) is a block that involves the administration of local anesthetic under ultrasound guidance between the great pectoral and small pectoral and between the small pectoral and serratus anterior.
PECS BLOCK 2
With the patient supine, the linear probe will be placed in the sagittal plane slightly lateral to the hemiclavicular line ipsilateral to the surgical site. Once both muscle planes of interest have been identified, in-plane needle insertion will proceed in the cranio-caudal direction. The first local anesthetic administration with Ropivacaine 0.5% will be 20ml between small pectoralis and serratus anterior. Coming out with the needle, 10ml of Ropivacaine 0.5% will then be injected between large and small pectoral.
ESP BLOCK
ESP block is a block that involves injection of local anesthetic below the elevator muscles of the spine.
ESP BLOCK
Positioning yourself behind the patient, lying on her side with the surgical hemilateral on top, you place the linear ultrasound probe in the sagittal plane and find the lateral margin of the transverse process. At this point, the blocking needle is inserted in the caudocranial direction and 25ml of Ropivacaine 0.5% is injected, taking care to visualize the anesthetic spread in the cranial direction.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PECS BLOCK 2
With the patient supine, the linear probe will be placed in the sagittal plane slightly lateral to the hemiclavicular line ipsilateral to the surgical site. Once both muscle planes of interest have been identified, in-plane needle insertion will proceed in the cranio-caudal direction. The first local anesthetic administration with Ropivacaine 0.5% will be 20ml between small pectoralis and serratus anterior. Coming out with the needle, 10ml of Ropivacaine 0.5% will then be injected between large and small pectoral.
ESP BLOCK
Positioning yourself behind the patient, lying on her side with the surgical hemilateral on top, you place the linear ultrasound probe in the sagittal plane and find the lateral margin of the transverse process. At this point, the blocking needle is inserted in the caudocranial direction and 25ml of Ropivacaine 0.5% is injected, taking care to visualize the anesthetic spread in the cranial direction.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Presence of written informed consent to the trial
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous drug use
* Chronic opioid and minor opioid therapy
* BMI \>40
* Allergy or contraindications to taking Paracetamol and Toradol
* Inability to use PCA (Patient Controlled Analgesia)
* Intraoperative opioid administration
* Patients with neuropathy
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo di Alessandria
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mirco Leo, Physician
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Azienda Ospedaliera SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Azienda Ospedaliera SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo
Alessandria, Piedmont, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ASO.RianGen.22.02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.