Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-06-07
2026-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Assessments will be conducted at multiple time-intervals to account for patient acclimation and plasticity to both the generalized and individualized pitch-maps. Audiological assessments will be tuned to identify patients' ability to discern pitch scaling and variation in sounds, as well as to understand complexities in speech such as mood and tone. Audiological testing will be conducted in collaboration with the National Centre for Audiology (London, ON) to ensure that the most accurate and relevant metrics are applied.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of a Revised Indication for Determining Adult Cochlear Implant Candidacy
NCT01337076
Clinical Metrics for Assessing Cochlear Implant Recipient MAPs
NCT02746172
Pitch Perception and Memory: Deficits and Training
NCT03707691
Impact of Microphone Positioning on Auditory Performance in Cochlear Implant Users
NCT04677517
Anatomy-Based Fitting in Unexperienced Cochlear Implant Users
NCT05451628
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
When the cochlea is not functioning properly, cochlear implantation is a successful treatment to restore the sense of sound. A cochlear implant (CI) is a neural-prosthetic device that consists of an external portion that sits behind the ear and a surgically implanted array of electrodes inserted along the cochlea. After surgery, implants are programmed using a process called pitch mapping, whereby each implanted electrode is assigned a specific stimulation frequency. A CI must span the entire length of the cochlea and stimulate with the correct pitch-map (meaning the correct nerves and locations are stimulated with the correct frequencies) to produce full and accurate hearing. When a generalized pitch-mapping approach is used, each electrode within a CI array will stimulate with a pre-specified frequency, independent of a patient's individual tonotopy or postoperative electrode location. Generalized pitch-mapping can result in a place-pitch mismatch of over one octave. This mismatch inhibits the pitch perception required for complex hearing tasks, such as music appreciation or speech recognition. Neural plasticity can allow auditory perception to adapt over time to reduce the effect of cochlear implant pitch-map errors, however this requires long periods of acclimation, is dependent on recipient age and environment, and can only overcome certain sized pitch-map errors. Customization of CI pitch-maps can reduce rehabilitation time and the need for implant acclimation.
Patient-specific pitch maps are produced by accurately determining each patient's cochlear duct length (CDL), or more specifically BM length, from diagnostic images. Previous methods to determine CDL have traditionally contained uncertainties at the start- and end-point of the BM, largely due to visualization limitations in the imaging modality used. Measuring an inaccurate BM length may cause an erroneous shift in all tonotopic frequencies. Using an enhanced imaging technique, our team has recently developed an algorithm to automatically and accurately estimate CDL, segment the BM, and determine CI electrode locations from individual patient computed-tomography (CT) scans to produce customized CI pitch-maps, called placed-based mapping (Helpard et al., 2021).
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether a place-based map improves hearing outcomes for cochlear implant recipients. We will compare the auditory abilities, speech recognition and spatial hearing (speech recognition in spatially separated noise, and sound source localization) for subjects randomized to listen exclusively with a default map versus our novel place-based map. We hypothesize that the majority of CI recipients will experience a faster rate of speech recognition and spatial hearing growth when their cochlear implant is mapped to match the electric stimulation with the tonotopic place frequency (i.e., using the place-based map).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
Participants will undergo repeated audiological and music and speech perception testing at baseline, initial activation (\~ 6 months post-operative), 1-month, 3-months, 6-months, 7-months, and 1-year post-activation. Each participant will listen to their assigned map during the first 6 months of cochlear implant use. After 6 months, participants will listen to the alternative map for 1 additional month. After the 7th month, participants will have the opportunity to choose their preferred map. Final assessment will take place at 1-year post-implantation. Performance will be compared between the groups and as a function of frequency-to-place mismatch.
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Place-based map
CIs will be mapped according to each participant's unique place-based map using MED-EL MAESTRO fitting software. Participants' audiological performance will be assessed in both the experimental and default programs at activation and at 6 months. At 1-month and 3-month visits, performance will be assessed in the participant's assigned program only. Following the 6-month testing interval, participants will listen to the alternative map than the one they were assigned for 1 additional month. At the 7-month visit, participants will be assessed in both programs. After the 7-month visit, participants will be given the choice to move forward with whichever map they prefer. The final assessment interval will take place at 1-year in the participant's chosen map.
Place-based cochlear implant mapping
Pre-operative, 3D CT scans of the temporal bone will be uploaded into a deep learning-based tool which automatically resamples, crops, segments, analyzes, and measures the patient's specific cochlear anatomy. These measurements will be input into an individualized pitch mapping function to determine a patient-specific tonotopic distribution of frequencies (place-based map). At device activation (approximately 1 month post-surgery) CIs will be programmed according to the place-based map.
Default map
CIs will be mapped according to the clinical default program using MED-EL MAESTRO fitting software. Participants' audiological performance will be assessed in both the experimental and default programs at activation and at 6 months. At 1-month and 3-month visits, performance will be assessed in the participant's assigned program only. Following the 6-month testing interval, participants will listen to the alternative map for 1 additional month from the one they were randomly assigned. At the 7-month visit, participants will be assessed in both programs. After the 7-month visit, participants will be given the choice to move forward with whichever map they prefer. The final assessment interval will take place at 1-year in the participant's chosen map.
Default cochlear implant mapping
At device activation (approximately 1 month post-surgery) CIs will be programmed according to the clinical default program.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Place-based cochlear implant mapping
Pre-operative, 3D CT scans of the temporal bone will be uploaded into a deep learning-based tool which automatically resamples, crops, segments, analyzes, and measures the patient's specific cochlear anatomy. These measurements will be input into an individualized pitch mapping function to determine a patient-specific tonotopic distribution of frequencies (place-based map). At device activation (approximately 1 month post-surgery) CIs will be programmed according to the place-based map.
Default cochlear implant mapping
At device activation (approximately 1 month post-surgery) CIs will be programmed according to the clinical default program.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Approved by the Cochlear Implant Program at London Health Sciences Centre (LHSC) to undergo unilateral cochlear implantation
* Identify as a native English speaker (recorded speech recognition/perception materials are presented in English)
* Deny any cognitive issues
* Willing and able to participate in study procedures (e.g., unaided testing, speech recognition testing, spatial hearing testing)
* Willing and able to return for follow-up visits (same intervals as recommended clinically for routine follow-up)
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Academic Medical Organization of Southwestern Ontario
OTHER
University of North Carolina
OTHER
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
OTHER
Western University, Canada
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sumit Agrawal
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sumit K Agrawal, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Western University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Western University
London, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Helpard L, Li H, Rohani SA, Zhu N, Rask-Andersen H, Agrawal S, Ladak HM. An Approach for Individualized Cochlear Frequency Mapping Determined From 3D Synchrotron Radiation Phase-Contrast Imaging. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2021 Dec;68(12):3602-3611. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2021.3080116. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
Nikan S, Van Osch K, Bartling M, Allen DG, Rohani SA, Connors B, Agrawal SK, Ladak HM. PWD-3DNet: A Deep Learning-Based Fully-Automated Segmentation of Multiple Structures on Temporal Bone CT Scans. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2021;30:739-753. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2020.3038363. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
119978
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.