Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-09-01
2026-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Improved Speech Recognition Performance in Noise by Encoding Binaural Spatial Cues to the Cochlear Implant User.
NCT04357704
Perceptual Consequences of Cochlear Implant Electrode-neuron Interfaces
NCT05867173
Comparison in New Cochlear Implanted Subjects of a Tonotopy-based Fitting With or Without Fine Structure Coding
NCT05754918
Clinical Utility of Residual Hearing in the Cochlear Implant Ear
NCT04707885
Hearing Study: Sensitivity to Features of Speech Sounds
NCT03666676
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aim 1 examines the perceptual and physiological plasticity associated with place and rate of cochlear implant stimulation. Cochlear implant users hear an increasing pitch associated with increasing stimulation rate, but this effect is difficult to measure above 300 Hz. Most studies of psychophysical sensitivity to cochlear implant stimulation rate have not considered perceptual learning. Preliminary results show that the sense of pitch provided by stimulation rate improves with training. The proposed research examines perceptual sensitivity and physiological encoding throughout a crossover training study with training provided for pitch based on place and rate of stimulation. The primary hypothesis tested is that cochlear implant users have a latent ability to hear pitch associated with stimulation rate, but they require training to learn how to use this new information.
Aim 2 is to determine whether dynamic-rate stimulation provides better sensitivity and better physiological encoding of fundamental frequency compared to conventional stimulation methods based on amplitude modulation of constant-rate stimulation. In normal physiology, auditory-nerve activity phase locks to the temporal fine structure of sound. Since cochlear implants typically discard this information, it is unknown how well cochlear implant users can learn to use it if provided. Aim 2 focuses on the comparison between dynamic-rate stimulation in which stimulation rate is dynamically adjusted to convey temporal fine structure compared to conventional methods based on amplitude modulation of constant-rate stimulation. The primary hypothesis is that dynamic-rate stimulation provides better pitch sensitivity and better physiological encoding compared to amplitude modulation of constant-rate stimulation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Stimulation Rate
Stimulation Rate
Psychophysical training listening to stimulation rate as a cue for auditory pitch perception. The intervention is the listening rehabilitative exercises. Exercises are completed daily as 30-minute sessions for 2 weeks.
Electrode Location
Psychophysical training listening to electrode location as a cue for auditory pitch perception. The intervention is the listening rehabilitative exercises. Exercises are completed daily as 30-minute sessions for 2 weeks.
Electrode Location
Stimulation Rate
Psychophysical training listening to stimulation rate as a cue for auditory pitch perception. The intervention is the listening rehabilitative exercises. Exercises are completed daily as 30-minute sessions for 2 weeks.
Electrode Location
Psychophysical training listening to electrode location as a cue for auditory pitch perception. The intervention is the listening rehabilitative exercises. Exercises are completed daily as 30-minute sessions for 2 weeks.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Stimulation Rate
Psychophysical training listening to stimulation rate as a cue for auditory pitch perception. The intervention is the listening rehabilitative exercises. Exercises are completed daily as 30-minute sessions for 2 weeks.
Electrode Location
Psychophysical training listening to electrode location as a cue for auditory pitch perception. The intervention is the listening rehabilitative exercises. Exercises are completed daily as 30-minute sessions for 2 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Rochester
OTHER
Ohio State University
OTHER
University of Southern California
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Raymond Goldsworthy
Associate Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.