Study of Auditory Performance on Prosodic Tests in Cochlear Implanted Subjects Using a Fine Structure Strategy

NCT ID: NCT03694704

Last Updated: 2025-05-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-02-28

Study Completion Date

2022-04-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Main objective:

Investigate how the FineHearing strategy of the MED-EL cochlear implant can extract prosody based solely on the frequency of the voice fundamental (F0) in speech

Secondary objectives:

Evaluate the time evolution of the results of prosodic tests Evaluate the time evolution of the results of differential frequency threshold test Evaluate the time evolution of vocal audiometric tests in silence and noise Evaluate the correlation between prosodic test results and frequency differential threshold results

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Introduction:

Prosodie is the study of the phenomena of accentuation and intonation (variation of pitch, duration and intensity) allowing the conveyance of information related to the sense such as the relief, but also the assertion, interrogation, injunction, exclamation ...

It has a role at the grammatical, emotional and pragmatic levels of communication by informing about the emotional state of the speaker (sad / happy), about sex and identity, about the type of statement (question / affirmation) and about the borders in the sentences.

The auditory cues that play a role in the perception of prosody include changes in the fundamental frequency F0 (ie vibrational frequency of the speaker's vocal cords) during a speech, the duration of the syllables, or the rate or intensity of the speech. \[Di Christo 2013\] The cochlear implant is a device for auditory rehabilitation. Its principle is to transform the analog signals recorded by a microphone into digital signals that directly stimulate the fibers of the auditory nerve through electrodes inserted into the cochlea. \[HAS 2012, HAS 2007, http://www.has-sante.fr\] Cochlear implants are indicated in cases of severe or profound sensorineural deafness.

Conventional stimulation strategies in cochlear implants (e.g. ACE, CIS) use the place of the electrode to code the frequency by sending low frequency information on the apical electrodes and high frequency information on the basal electrodes. The stimulation rate of the electrodes is constant. \[Wilson \& Dorman 2008\] The pitch is only partially transmitted by these conventional strategies \[Moore 2003; Oxenham 2008\] which would explain the poor results of cochlear implants in the perception of music \[Bruns \& al. 2016; Galvin III \& al. 2009; Veekmans \& al. 2009; Cooper \& al. 2008\] and prosody \[Kalathottukaren \& al. 2015 ; Meister et al. 2011; Meister et al. 2009\].

In the FineHearing strategy of the MED-EL implant, the rate of stimulation on the low-frequency electrodes is related to the frequency of the sound and makes it possible to code the frequency information temporally.

\[Rader \& al. 2016\] have studied the contribution of adding to the tonotopic coding of the frequency (classical strategy) a temporal coding of the information by varying the stimulation rate. The results obtained show that providing this frequency information by time coding makes it possible to obtain perceived pitch much closer to the expected pitch (of normal-hearing) and less variability, especially at low frequencies. With fixed stimulation rate (classical strategy) low frequencies are poorly coded, whereas with the variable stimulation rate they are better coded.

The FineHearing coding strategy of MED-EL with long insertion of electrode could therefore make it possible to better transmit the prosody and specifically to better extract the fundamental frequency F0 of the voice.

Objective of the study The objective of the study is to evaluate if the FineHearing strategy of the MED-EL implant allows to better transmit the prosody and specifically by the fundamental frequency of the voice (F0).

Main objective:

Show that the MED-EL FineHearing strategy (with deep insertion of the electrode) allows to extract prosody cues based only on the fundamental frequency F0.

Secondary objectives:

* evaluate differential frequency thresholds and correlation with prosodic performance
* Evaluate the positioning of the electrode array and its effect on prosodic performance

Plan of study:

It is a prospective open multicenter longitudinal study: measures will be done on the patient at 6 and 12 month post-activation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Bilateral

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CI with FineHearing Strategy

cochlear implant with FineHearing strategy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

FineHearing strategy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Cochlear implant with FineHearing strategy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

FineHearing strategy

Cochlear implant with FineHearing strategy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient with MED-EL cochlear implant (Sonnet / Synchrony)
* Adult patient (≥ 18 years old) speaking French
* Patient having an estimate of the optimal size of the electrode for its cochlea with the MED-EL software before their implantation.
* Patient with post-implant audiometry thresholds without cochlear implant \> 80 dB HL on 250 Hz, 500 Hz and 1000 Hz frequencies (no residual hearing)
* Patient with vocal audiometry in quiet on Fournier's disyllabic words ≥ 70% at 6 months post-activation

Exclusion Criteria

* Retro-cochlear pathology: auditory neuropathy, vestibular schwannoma
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GesmbH

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mathieu Marx, Pr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Toulouse

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU Toulouse

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MED-EL_FS_prosody_french_study

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Effects of Pulses on Loudness
NCT04010721 COMPLETED NA