Comparison of Speech Understanding Between Tonotopy-based Fitting and Setting Based on Evolutionary Algorithms
NCT ID: NCT06737185
Last Updated: 2025-03-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
22 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-01-15
2028-01-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Compare speech recognition in noise with tonotopic setting (FS4T) and with tonotopic fitting modified by evolutionary algorithm (EAFS4T) in adult patients implanted for 6 months or more with a MED-EL cochlear implant with FS4T.
Secondary objectives:
Comparison of FS4T and EAFS4T settings
* for speech recognition in quiet
* for subjective auditory spatial perception
* for subjective auditory and musical perception
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Speech Perception of a Tonotopy-based Fitting for Cochlear Implant Recipients for 6 Months With Conventional Setting
NCT06723262
Comparison in New Cochlear Implanted Subjects of a Tonotopy-based Bimodal Fitting and a Conventional Fitting
NCT05955469
Comparison in New Cochlear Implanted Subjects of a Tonotopy-based Fitting With or Without Fine Structure Coding
NCT05754918
Study of Music and Speech Perception in New Cochlear Implanted Subjects Using or Not a Tonotopy Based Fitting
NCT04922619
Improved Speech Recognition Performance in Noise by Encoding Binaural Spatial Cues to the Cochlear Implant User.
NCT04357704
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A tonotopy-based fitting allows for better results in pitch perception or speech perception in noise or musical perception. However, there is a large variability in the results observed between patients. This variability could be due to the individual characteristics of the listeners (neuronal survival, current propagation and spread, duration of deafness, lack of cortical plasticity).
A modification of frequency allocations in the setting could take into account this individual variability and improve speech discrimination and music perception. Saadoun et al. (2022) studied on 27 subjects the effect of an adjustment of frequency allocation by an evolutionary algorithm (EA) approach and showed an improvement in speech perception in noise compared to a default setting (not based on tonotopy) for patients implanted for more than 6 months in a bimodal situation (with a contralateral prosthesis). We therefore propose to use evolutionary algorithms to modify the tonotopy-based fitting and improve the perception in noise of implanted patients.
Main objective:
Compare speech recognition in noise with tonotopic setting (FS4T) and tonotopic fitting modified by evolutionary algorithm (EAFS4T) in adult patients implanted for 6 months or more with a MED-EL cochlear implant with FS4T.
Secondary objectives:
Comparison of FS4T and EAFS4T settings
* for speech recognition in quiet
* for subjective auditory spatial perception
* for subjective auditory and musical perception
Plan of the study: It is a prospective open monocentric transversal study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
EA arm
at 6 month post-activation: evolutionary algorithms to modify the tonotopy-based fitting FS4T to give EAFS4T fitting.
Participant wears EAFS4T during 6 weeks.
EAFS4T: modification with evolutionary algorithm of tonotopic-based fitting
Comparison of FS4T and EAFS4T
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
EAFS4T: modification with evolutionary algorithm of tonotopic-based fitting
Comparison of FS4T and EAFS4T
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient who fulfils the criteria for cochlear implantation
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GesmbH
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alexis BOZORG GRAYELI, Pr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU
Dijon, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MEDEL_algoevIC_Dijon_study
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.