Comparison of Speech Understanding Between Tonotopy-based Fitting and Setting Based on Evolutionary Algorithms

NCT ID: NCT06737185

Last Updated: 2025-03-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-15

Study Completion Date

2028-01-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Main objective:

Compare speech recognition in noise with tonotopic setting (FS4T) and with tonotopic fitting modified by evolutionary algorithm (EAFS4T) in adult patients implanted for 6 months or more with a MED-EL cochlear implant with FS4T.

Secondary objectives:

Comparison of FS4T and EAFS4T settings

* for speech recognition in quiet
* for subjective auditory spatial perception
* for subjective auditory and musical perception

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Introduction: Cochlear implantation allows the rehabilitation of profound bilateral deafness, restoring speech perception and verbal communication when the traditional hearing aid no longer provides satisfactory hearing gain. A cochlear implant includes an electrode array and its functioning is based on the principle of cochlear tonotopy: each electrode encodes a frequency spectrum according to its position in the cochlea (high frequencies are assigned to the basal electrodes and low frequencies to the apical electrodes). The cochlear implant thus breaks down the frequency spectrum into a number of frequency bands via bandpass filters corresponding to the number of electrodes in the implant. During the fitting these bands can be modified by the audiologist. The fitting software developed by the manufacturers proposed a default fitting with a lower limit between 100 and 250 Hz according to the brands and an upper limit of about 8500 Hz. The frequency bands assigned to each electrode follow a logarithmic scale with the high frequencies for the basal electrodes and the low frequencies for the apical electrodes. This distribution takes into account the number of active electrodes but does not take into account the anatomy and the natural cochlear tonotopy specific to each patient. Several studies have analyzed the anatomical variations of the cochlear dimensions: size of the cochlea and the ratio between the contact surfaces of the electrodes with the cochlea are variable from one patient to another. The insertion depth during surgery is also variable due to parameters related to the patients as well as to the operator, which seems to impact the understanding of speech in noise. Mathematical algorithms have recently been developed to estimate the cochlear tonotopy of each patient from a CT scan assessment. CT imaging of the implanted ear combined with 3D reconstruction software, provides cochlear length measurements Using this approach it is possible to measure the position of each electrode relative to the cochlear apex. Recently, MED-EL (Austria) has developed a new approach based on CT-scan and tuning of the frequencies associated with each electrode using anatomical information of position of the electrodes in the cochlea: this fitting is called anatomy-based fitting.

A tonotopy-based fitting allows for better results in pitch perception or speech perception in noise or musical perception. However, there is a large variability in the results observed between patients. This variability could be due to the individual characteristics of the listeners (neuronal survival, current propagation and spread, duration of deafness, lack of cortical plasticity).

A modification of frequency allocations in the setting could take into account this individual variability and improve speech discrimination and music perception. Saadoun et al. (2022) studied on 27 subjects the effect of an adjustment of frequency allocation by an evolutionary algorithm (EA) approach and showed an improvement in speech perception in noise compared to a default setting (not based on tonotopy) for patients implanted for more than 6 months in a bimodal situation (with a contralateral prosthesis). We therefore propose to use evolutionary algorithms to modify the tonotopy-based fitting and improve the perception in noise of implanted patients.

Main objective:

Compare speech recognition in noise with tonotopic setting (FS4T) and tonotopic fitting modified by evolutionary algorithm (EAFS4T) in adult patients implanted for 6 months or more with a MED-EL cochlear implant with FS4T.

Secondary objectives:

Comparison of FS4T and EAFS4T settings

* for speech recognition in quiet
* for subjective auditory spatial perception
* for subjective auditory and musical perception

Plan of the study: It is a prospective open monocentric transversal study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Bilateral

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

EA arm

at 6 month post-activation: evolutionary algorithms to modify the tonotopy-based fitting FS4T to give EAFS4T fitting.

Participant wears EAFS4T during 6 weeks.

Group Type OTHER

EAFS4T: modification with evolutionary algorithm of tonotopic-based fitting

Intervention Type OTHER

Comparison of FS4T and EAFS4T

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

EAFS4T: modification with evolutionary algorithm of tonotopic-based fitting

Comparison of FS4T and EAFS4T

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

FS4T: tonotopic-based fitting

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patient (\>= 18 years old) speaking French
* Patient who fulfils the criteria for cochlear implantation

Exclusion Criteria

* retro-cochlear pathology: auditory neuropathy, vestibular schwannoma
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GesmbH

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alexis BOZORG GRAYELI, Pr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU

Dijon, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Vincent Péan, PhD

Role: CONTACT

603592974 ext. +33

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Alexis BOZORG GRAYELI, Pr

Role: primary

0380293758

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MEDEL_algoevIC_Dijon_study

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.