Variability In Hearing Aid Outcomes In Older Adults

NCT ID: NCT02448706

Last Updated: 2020-11-17

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

49 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-07-31

Study Completion Date

2017-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this project is to find out if the way a hearing aid processes a sound signal should be determined in part by an individual's cognitive characteristics. We anticipate that the outcome of this work will be a battery of assessments that will guide hearing aid processing for older patients with hearing loss.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Response to hearing aids is highly variable, with some individuals reporting much more benefit than others. Preliminary work by our laboratory and others suggests that patient factors-including cognition-may contribute to differences in how individuals respond to altered speech cues, such as those alterations introduced by hearing aid processing. The long-term goal of this work is to improve hearing aid outcomes by optimizing hearing aid processing for each individual.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hearing Loss Presbycusis

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

hearing aid

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hearing Aid Fitting Order A

High level of signal manipulation for 6 weeks, followed by a low level of signal manipulation for 6 weeks.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Hearing Aid Fitting A

Intervention Type DEVICE

Hearing Aid Fitting B

Intervention Type DEVICE

Hearing Aid Fitting Order B

Low level of signal manipulation for 6 weeks, followed by a low level of signal manipulation for 6 weeks.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Hearing Aid Fitting A

Intervention Type DEVICE

Hearing Aid Fitting B

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hearing Aid Fitting A

Intervention Type DEVICE

Hearing Aid Fitting B

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Hearing Aid

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Sensorineural Hearing loss with pure-tone thresholds 25-70 dB HL at octave frequencies between 250 and 4000 Hz, 4 frequency PTA of ≥ 30 dB HL
* Non hearing aided wearer within the previous year
* Participants will be in good health (self-report)
* Normal or corrected to normal vision(≤20/50)

Exclusion Criteria

* Conductive, or asymmetric hearing loss
* Hearing loss exceeding the limits that can be successfully aided with hearing aids (i.e., profound hearing loss)
* Hearing loss remediated with a cochlear implant (cannot wear hearing aids)
* Significant history of otologic or neurologic disorders
* Non English speaking participants
* Score of 23 or below on Mini-Mental Status Exam (MMSE)
* Score of 22 or below on Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
* Any clinically significant unstable or progressive medical condition
* Any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, places the participant at unacceptable risk if he or she were to participate in the study.
* Participants will be divided into low and high working groups based upon the results of their Lunner working memory reading span test. Once either high or low working memory group is filled (approximately 25 participants) we will selectively enroll participants to fill the other category.
Minimum Eligible Age

54 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Northwestern University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Pamela Souza

Professor School of Communication

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pamela E Souza, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Northwestern University

Kathryn H Arehart, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Colorado at Boulder

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Colorado at Boulder

Boulder, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Anderson M, Rallapalli V, Schoof T, Souza P, Arehart K. The use of self-report measures to examine changes in perception in response to fittings using different signal processing parameters. Int J Audiol. 2018 Nov;57(11):809-815. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1490035. Epub 2018 Jul 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30052097 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R01DC012289-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

1R01DC012289-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link