HFNC Versus Oxygen Face Mask on Postoperative Pulmonery Complications

NCT ID: NCT05548309

Last Updated: 2022-09-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

94 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-04-30

Study Completion Date

2022-07-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Eighty adult patients were randomly categorized into two equal groups (forty patients each): HFNC was applied to group I, and a simple oxygen face mask was applied to group II. Postoperative pulmonary complications were assessed for five days later.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

After an informed written consent taken from all the patients included in this study, they were assessed thoroughly by:

* Detailed medical and surgical history taking.
* Complete clinical examination.
* Routine laboratory investigations, including complete blood picture, blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, prothrombin (PT), activated partial thromboplastin (aPTT) times, thrombin time, fasting blood sugar.
* Electrocardiograph (ECG) and chest x-ray.

On arrival of the patient to the operative theatre peripheral intravenous cannula gauge 18 was inserted and all patients were attached to multichannel monitor (CARESCAPE™ Monitor B650) to display the following:

1. Heart rate (beats/ minute).
2. Non-invasive systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressure (mmHg).
3. Respiratory rate (breaths/min).
4. Peripheral oxygen saturation (%).
5. End tidal carbon dioxide (mmHg). Epidural catheter was inserted for all patients at level T7-T9, loading dose 1-1.5 ml/segment of 0.125% bupivacaine with fentanyl 1mic/ml and was continued as an infusion intraoperatively combined with general anaesthesia with infusion rate 5ml/hour. Mechanical ventilation was initiated after tracheal intubation using volume control mode.

At the end of the surgery lung recruitment was done by closing an adjustable pressure-limiting valve at continuous positive airway pressure 30 cmH2O2 for 30 seconds.Extubation was done after patients fulfilling the criteria of extubation.

Oxygen therapy was delivered through simple face mask while transportation to ICU with flow rate 6-10L/min titrated to maintain SpO2 ≥ 94%.

Patients were randomly categorized using closed envelope technique into 2 equal groups (40 patients each as calculated by the department of biomedical informatics and medical statistics, medical research institute, Alexandria University) Group I: High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) was inserted through specific medium/large nasal prongs (Fisher \& Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand). FiO2 was continuously measured by a dedicated system (AIRVO™ 2; Fisher \& Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand) connected to the HFNC. Starting flow 35 L/min, temperature 31oc. the flow was titrated up to 60L/min with a target SpO2 of ≥94%.

Group II: Simple oxygen face mask was applied to patients starting flow rate 6L/min and titration of flow rate up to 10L/min was done to target peripheral oxygen saturation SpO2 of ≥94%.

Gradual weaning started after 6 hours when satisfactory ABG obtained, targeting SpO2 ≥ 94%.Oxygen therapy was discontinued and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) was started for both groups when patients developed moderate acute hypoxemic respiratory failure at least 2 of the following criteria were met:

1. Respiratory frequency more than 25 and less than 35 breaths/min persistent for at least 1 hour.
2. Clinical signs of respiratory distress (dyspnea, significant use of accessory muscles, or paradoxical abdominal motion).
3. Respiratory acidosis (PH less than 7.35 units and PaCO2 more than 45 mm Hg).
4. Moderate hypoxemia defined as PaO2/FiO2 more than 150 and less than 300.

Endotracheal intubation was performed when the patients of both groups developed severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (at least 2 of the following criteria) were met:

1. Respiratory frequency 40 breaths/min.
2. Clinical signs of respiratory distress (dyspnea, significant use of accessory muscles, or paradoxical abdominal motion).
3. Respiratory acidosis with an arterial PH less than 7.30, and PaCO2 more than 45 mm Hg).
4. Severe hypoxemia defined as PaO2/FiO2 less than 150. All other treatments were continued according to the standard care in ICU with patients of both groups receiving physiotherapy, upright positioning, incentive spirometry, and early mobilization.

Incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications detected in ICU by daily chest x-ray and lung US .

Chest X-ray was done on day 1, day3, day 5 and the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications were recorded according to European Perioperative Clinical Outcome definitions (EPCO).

Lung ultrasound using (Sonosite M-Turbo® Ultrasound System) linear transducer (L38Xi 10-5 MHZ) was performed on postoperative day (POD) 0, day1, day2, day3, day4, day5, lung ultrasound views were obtained according to the Bed Side Lung Ultrasound in Emergency protocol (BLUE).

Two hands placed this way (size equivalent to the patient's hands, upper hand touching the clavicle, thumbs excluded) correspond to the location of the lung, and allow three standardized points to be defined .

1\. The upper BLUE point is in the middle of the upper hand. 2. The lower BLUE point is in the middle of the lower palm. 3. The poster lateral alveolar or pleural syndromes (PLAPS) point is defined by the intersection of a horizontal line at the level of the lower BLUE point and a vertical line at the posterior axillary line.BLUE profile for each BLUE point and BLUE profile per hemi thorax will be determined as follows:

1. The A profile associates anterior lung sliding with A lines .
2. The A' profile is an A profile with abolished lung sliding.
3. The B profile predominantly multiple (\>2) anterior diffuse B lines indicating interstitial syndrome associates anterior lung sliding .
4. The B' profile is a B-profile with abolished lung sliding.
5. The C profile indicates anterior lung consolidation, regardless of size and number, thickened, irregular pleural line is an equivalent.
6. The A/B profile is a half A profile at one lung, a half B profile at another. Furthermore, the postero lateral alveolar and/or pleural syndrome (PLAPS) was determined at PLAPS point and was scored as positive or negative. When consolidation and/or pleural effusion were detected they were scored separately; for differentiation between pneumonia and atelectasis, fever, leukocyte count, and C-reactive protein were looked for.Diaphragmatic excursion was measured (On admission day 0, day1, day 2, day3, day4, day5).

The low frequency curvilinear transducer (C60xi 5-2 MHZ) was placed in bilateral costal margins between the anterior and posterior axillary lines for longitudinal scanning. Images of diaphragmatic excursions was obtained using the liver and spleen as acoustic windows during full respiration. With normal breathing of patients in the 45° semi supination position, the maximum vertical axis between the adjacent peaks and valleys using the sinusoid in the M mode was measured as the diaphragmatic excursion movement .

Multiple respiratory cycles of at least three cycles were recorded and the average was taken. Every side measurements (right and left hemidiaphragms) was measured and calculated separately and then the average of measurements of the two sides were calculated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Post Operative Pulmonary Complications

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

High flow nasal cannula

High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) was inserted through nasal prongs (Fisher \& Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand) . FiO2 was continuously measured by a dedicated system (AIRVO™ 2; Fisher \& Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand) .

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

HFNC

Intervention Type DEVICE

High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) was inserted through specific medium/large nasal prongs . FiO2 was continuously measured by a dedicated system (AIRVO™ 2; Fisher \& Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand) connected to the HFNC. Starting flow 35 L/min, temperature 31oc. The flow was titrated up to 60L/min with a target SpO2 of ≥94%.

oxygen face mask

Simple oxygen face mask was applied to patients starting with flow rate 6L/min .

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Oxygen face mask

Intervention Type DEVICE

Oxygen face mask was applied to patients postoperatively with starting flow 8L/min and titration of flow up to 10 L/min with target SpO2 of ≥94%

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

HFNC

High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) was inserted through specific medium/large nasal prongs . FiO2 was continuously measured by a dedicated system (AIRVO™ 2; Fisher \& Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand) connected to the HFNC. Starting flow 35 L/min, temperature 31oc. The flow was titrated up to 60L/min with a target SpO2 of ≥94%.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Oxygen face mask

Oxygen face mask was applied to patients postoperatively with starting flow 8L/min and titration of flow up to 10 L/min with target SpO2 of ≥94%

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients (50-70 years).
* Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status I-III.
* Patients with body mass index less than 35kg/m2.
* Patients scheduled for major elective upper abdominal surgeries (gastrectomy, hepatic resection, pancreatectomy, Whipple procedures,..).
* Upper abdominal surgery with an abdominal incision longer than 5 cm that is above or extending above the umbilicus.
* Upper abdominal surgeries with an anticipated duration of two hours or more.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with tracheostomy

.• Patients with pre-existing pulmonary disease (pleural effusion, pneumothorax or pulmonary atelectasis).
* Patients with pre-existing obstructive sleep apnea.
* Patients with any nasal or facial defect that could impede use of HFNC (Nasal septal defect or any form of facial deformity).
* Impaired consciousness Glasgow coma scale (GCS) less than 12.
* Hemodynamic instability as systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg, mean arterial blood pressure less than 65 mmHg or vasopressor requirement.
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Alexandria University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Huda abdellatif Boghdady

assistant lecturer,alexandria university

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dorya fekry, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Alexandria University

Ahmed EL-Attar, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Alexandria University

Mohamed El Hadidy, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Alexandria University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alexandria University,Faculty of Medicine

Alexandria, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

High Flow Nasal cannula

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Lung Recruitment and Postoperative CPAP
NCT02502279 COMPLETED PHASE2