Effect of Speaking Aloud After Abdominal Surgery.

NCT ID: NCT04276584

Last Updated: 2024-01-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-02-20

Study Completion Date

2020-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hypoxia and reduced vital capacity is commonly occurring after abdominal surgery. Positive expiratory pressure is one treatment suggested to improve lung function after surgery. We aim to test whether speaking improves postoperative oxygen saturation and ventilation after abdominal surgery. In a cross-over design, 50 subjects will be randomized to start with either positive expiratory pressure maneuvers, i.e. deep inspiration followed by expiration in a positive expiratory pressure device at 10-15 cm of water, or to start with reading a text loudly. Arterial blood gases will be taken at study start. Patients will be monitored using Noxturnal T3, Res Med for respiration and pulse oximetry, and online transcutaneous carbon dioxide partial pressure measurements (SenTec Digital monitoring systems). Main outcome measurements include oxygen saturation after speaking compared with positive expiratory pressure therapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Hypoxia and reduced vital capacity is commonly occurring after abdominal surgery. Positive expiratory pressure is one treatment suggested to improve lung function after surgery, but there is a lack of evidence of effect. En passant, we observed that oxygen saturation was improved when patients talked postoperative day 1. We aim to test whether speaking improves postoperative oxygen saturation and ventilation after abdominal surgery.

It was estimated that a sample size of 34 patients was needed to detect a mean and (SD) difference in oxygen saturation of 1% (2%) and to detect a difference in transcutaneous carbon dioxide partial pressure of 0.5 kPa (1 kPa) with a significance level of 0.05 and a power of 0.8.

In a randomized controlled trial, 50 subjects will be randomized (1:1) to start with either positive expiratory pressure maneuvers, i.e. 3 x 10 deep inspiration followed by expiration in a positive expiratory pressure device of 10-15 cm H20 or to start with reading a text loudly during 3 minutes. Patients will be monitored using Noxturnal T3, Res Med for respiration and pulse oximetry. SenTec Digital Monitoring systems for online transcutaneous carbon dioxide partial pressure measurements.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Respiratory Complications

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Positive expiratory pressure is given to patients after abdominal surgery in order to improve postoperative oxygen saturation and lung function. We aim to test whether speaking loudly from a given text improve postoperative oxygen saturation and ventilation. 50 patients will be investigated in a randomized controlled trial with cross-over design starting either with positive expiratory pressure therapy (10 times 3 inspiration and expiration to positive expiratory pressure) or with speaking loudly from a given text.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Patients are given a serial number. The randomization orders are blinded to the outcome assessor.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Positive expiratory pressure

Deep inspiration followed by expiration to a resistance of 10-15 cm of water pressure. Done three times, each time with 10 inspiration/expiration cycles

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Positive expiratory pressure

Intervention Type DEVICE

Three blocks of 10 deep inspiration followed by expiration against a positive airway pressure device of 10-15 cm of water pressure. Repeated three times. Estimated time of 3 minutes time.

Speaking loudly

Speaking loudly during 3 minutes.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Speaking loudly during about 3 minutes

Intervention Type OTHER

A specified swedish text

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Positive expiratory pressure

Three blocks of 10 deep inspiration followed by expiration against a positive airway pressure device of 10-15 cm of water pressure. Repeated three times. Estimated time of 3 minutes time.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Speaking loudly during about 3 minutes

A specified swedish text

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Performed abdominal surgery within 2 days at the departments of surgery, urology or gynecology at Umeå university hospital

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients referred to ICU because of immediate postoperative complications.

* Patients who are unable to perform the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Swedish Heart Lung Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Umeå University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Karl A Franklin, MD, Prof

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dept Surgical and periopertive sciences, Umeå university, Sweden

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dept of Surgery, Inst of Surgical and Perioperative sciences

Umeå, Umea, Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

201822831

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.