Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) Therapy in High Risk Patients Following Cardiac Surgery

NCT ID: NCT02732574

Last Updated: 2016-09-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

162 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-05-31

Study Completion Date

2017-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Respiratory dysfunction following cardiac surgery is well documented and due in part to the location of the incision and nature of the surgery. Post-operative pulmonary complications (PPCs) remain a significant problem following cardiac surgery, sometimes causing prolonged length of stay in hospital as well as increased morbidity and mortality; with the greater risk to older adults and individuals with obstructive lung disease. Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) therapy is thought to increase lung volumes and facilitate secretion clearance. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the addition of oscillating PEP therapy to standard postoperative treatment is more effective in decreasing the incidence of PPCs and increasing functional capacity at time of discharge in 'high risk' patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Respiratory dysfunction following cardiac surgery is well documented and due in part to the location of the incision and nature of the surgery (Weissman, 2000; Garcia-Delgado M, et al., 2014). Patients undergoing cardiac surgery are at an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications including hypoxemia, atelectasis, and pneumonia (Weissman, 2000; Garcia-Delgado M, et al., 2014; O'Donohue WJ, 1992); with an increased risk in older individuals and individuals with obstructive lung disease (Crowe \& Bradley, 1997; Weissman 2000; Jensen et al., 2007). Standard postoperative care includes early mobility and deep breathing and coughing (DB\&C) (Stiller K, et al., 1995; Johnson D., et al., 1996) usually initiated within the first 24 hours following surgery. Although standard care is sufficient in some instances, postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) remain a significant problem following cardiac surgery and can cause prolonged length of stay in the hospital and an increase in morbidity and mortality (Weissman, 2000; Garcia-Delgado M, et al., 2014) in a significant number of patients. Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) therapy is thought to increase lung volumes and facilitate secretion clearance in many populations (Orman J \& Wasterdahl E, 2009) and has been shown to be particularly effective in individuals with obstructive lung disease (Bott et al ., 2009). In consideration of the well documented respiratory dysfunction observed following cardiac surgery, PEP therapy may serve as a promising treatment in facilitating recovery in older, 'higher risk' individuals following elective cardiac surgery. Thus, the purpose of this study is to investigate whether the addition of oscillating PEP therapy is more effective than standard treatment alone in improving functional status at time of discharge, as well as decreasing oxygen requirements and the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (e.g., pneumonia, atelectasis, pneumothorax, pleural effusions) in 'high risk' patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery.

Participants will be recruited from London Health Sciences Centre in London Ontario. Patients deciding to proceed with elective cardiac surgery will be screened in the surgeon's office, pre-admission clinic or the 6-inpatient ward for eligibility to participate in the study and provided with a letter of information. Each patient will be required to provide written consent in order to participate in this study. The study will be approved by the Health Sciences Research Ethics Board at Western University. Patients who have consented to participation in the study will be seen by the research coordinator at the patient's pre-operative clinic appointment where the research coordinator will explain the purpose and nature of the study and obtain written informed consent. Also, at that time, patient demographic information will be collected, as well as baseline data of chest x-ray (CXR) and a six minute walk test (6MWT). Pre-operative 6MWTs will be performed on a standardized 30 meter track in the basement of University Hospital and will comply with the American Thoracic Society Guidelines (2002). Patients enrolled in the study will be randomized to one of two groups on the day of their surgery; OPEP treatment or sham treatment group. On the day of surgery or post-operative day (POD) 1, the research coordinator will bring the device (OPEP or sham depending on randomization) to the patient's room. The sham devices have been manufactured to be externally identical to the OPEP devices allowing for patient blinding, however the sham devices do not contain the internal mechanisms provided expiratory pressure. All patients (sham or OPEP) will be seen by a physiotherapist on the day of extubation and receive instructions on how to properly use the device, in addition to receiving standard post-operative care. Patients will be instructed to set the resistance on the device to the highest setting and perform up to 15 breaths in the sitting position at least twice per waking hour. The resistance and number of repetitions may be decreased to adjust for patient tolerance as deemed appropriate by the treating physiotherapist. Compliance will be measured through a log book completed by the patient and/or their family. Patients will be reassessed by a physiotherapist on POD #2 and #3 to ensure proper technique and compliance with the device. All patients will continue to receive standard care each day as per the clinical pathway and may receive additional cardiorespiratory PT techniques as deemed necessary by the PT. Patients will be instructed to continue with OPEP treatments (sham or OPEP) as described until POD #5. Outcome assessment will be conducted by a blinded assessor. The outcomes and timing of outcome assessment is described in the outcome measures section and will terminate on POD #7 or discharge from hospital, whichever occurs first. If patients require continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP), or reintubation during this period, they will be instructed to stop using their OPEP device and outcome assessment will occur only until POD#7.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiac Surgery Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Older Adults Postoperative Pulmonary Complications

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

OPEP Device Treatment

Patients randomized to OPEP will receive the device on postoperative day (POD) 1 or day of extubation, whichever comes first. Patients will be seen on POD #1 by a blinded physiotherapist (PT) for mobility and education on supported coughing. The OPEP device group will also be instructed to complete 15 breaths twice per waking hour in a seated position and receive education on proper use of the device. The OPEP device will be set to the highest pressure setting unless deemed inappropriate by the PT, at which time the most appropriate pressure setting will be selected and then increased daily until the OPEP device is set to the highest pressure setting by POD #3 if able. The PT will reassess the patients on POD 2 and 3 to assess for proper technique and continued use of the device, as well as usual care. Patients will use the OPEP device up to POD#5 pressure settings and compliance will be recorded and measure by use of a daily log.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Oscilatory Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) device

Intervention Type DEVICE

OPEP devices will be set to the highest pressure setting tolerated on POD #1. If the highest pressure setting is not achieved on POD#1, the PT will increase the pressure daily with the aim to achieve the highest pressure setting as soon as tolerated by the patient or POD#3, whichever comes first. Patients will be instructed to complete 15 breaths in a seated position with the OPEP device twice per waking hour. This will occur in addition to usual care.

SHAM Device

Patients randomized to the sham treatment will receive the sham device on postoperative day (POD) 1 or day of extubation, whichever comes first. Patients will be seen on POD #1 by a blinded physiotherapist (PT) for mobility and education on supported coughing. The sham group will also be instructed to complete 15 breaths twice per waking hour in a seated position and receive education on proper use of the device. The sham device is identical in exterior appearance to the OPEP device but does not contain the internal mechanism providing expiratory pressure. As such, the device will be set to the highest setting and will not need to be adjusted at all for patient tolerance. The PT will reassess the patients on POD 2 and 3 to assess for proper technique and continued use of the device, as well as usual care. Patients will use the OPEP device up to POD#5 pressure settings and compliance will be recorded and measure by use of a daily log.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

SHAM Device Group

Intervention Type DEVICE

SHAM devices will be provided to patients on POD #1 and set to the highest pressure setting externally, however no positive expiratory pressure will be provided as the internal pressure regulating mechanism has been removed. Patients will be instructed to complete 15 breaths in a seated position with the sham device twice per waking hour. This will occur in addition to usual care.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Oscilatory Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) device

OPEP devices will be set to the highest pressure setting tolerated on POD #1. If the highest pressure setting is not achieved on POD#1, the PT will increase the pressure daily with the aim to achieve the highest pressure setting as soon as tolerated by the patient or POD#3, whichever comes first. Patients will be instructed to complete 15 breaths in a seated position with the OPEP device twice per waking hour. This will occur in addition to usual care.

Intervention Type DEVICE

SHAM Device Group

SHAM devices will be provided to patients on POD #1 and set to the highest pressure setting externally, however no positive expiratory pressure will be provided as the internal pressure regulating mechanism has been removed. Patients will be instructed to complete 15 breaths in a seated position with the sham device twice per waking hour. This will occur in addition to usual care.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Aerobika

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* CABG surgery or CABG-one valve (mitral or aortic) surgery (including conventional sternotomy on cardiopulmonary bypass, minimally-invasive and off-pump surgery)
* Age \>= 60 years
* Documentation of at least one of the following: (pre-operative fraction of expired volume in one second (FEV1) of less than 70% predicted), (pre-operative FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) of less than 80%), or (on any daily usage of inhaled anti-cholinergic, beta2-agonist, or corticosteroid)
* New York Heart Association (NYHA) ≥ 2

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients not meeting inclusion for high risk surgical candidate
* Unable/unwilling to provide written informed consent
* Patients undergoing emergent cardiac surgery
* Untreated postoperative pneumothorax
* Patients on home CPAP or BiPAP therapy
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Philip Jones

Associate Scientist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Philip M Jones, MD, MSc (Clinical Trials)

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Western University, Canada

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital - London Health Sciences Centre

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Stephanie Fox, BA, RRT

Role: CONTACT

519-685-8500

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Stephanie Fox, BA, RRT

Role: primary

519-685-8500

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

OPEP-2016

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.