Could Self-distancing Alter the Perception of Experimental Pain?
NCT ID: NCT05511857
Last Updated: 2022-09-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
292 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-09-07
2024-06-09
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Multisensory Integration and Pain Perception
NCT03471689
Self-induced Cognitive Trance for Chronic Pain Management
NCT06038370
The Effect of Combining Pain Neuroscience Education and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Pain Catastrophizing, Kinesiophobia, and Pain in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT05571215
Resilience Skills Self-Management for Chronic Pain.
NCT03304613
Does Boredom With Simultaneously Perceived Pain Affect Pressure Pain Thresholds
NCT07330167
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In the first part of this study, which will be the first registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, we will experimentally induce pain in healthy participants (N = 292) with a cold pressor apparatus. The cold pressor apparatus holds a constant water temperature of 1 degree Celsius, which creates pain in the immersed hand. At the experimental test session, the participant will first be comfortably seated and receive information about the task and the experimental pain induction. They will be instructed to withhold their hand in the cold water for as long as possible, but when they feel that the pain becomes too intense they can choose to remove their hand. After that, a blood pressure measurement will be conducted. Directly after that, the participant will be instructed to put their hand in the cold water-bath (the cold pressor apparatus), and when they put their hand in the cold water a new blood pressure measurement will be conducted. A timer will be started to measure the time in seconds that the participant is able to keep their hand in the cold water. While their hand is in the cold water-bath, the participant will conduct one of the four different interventions (self-distanced, third-person self-talk following a cue-card; self-immersed, first-person self-talk following a cue-card; distraction intervention following a cue-card; no intervention (control)). When the participant removes their hand from the cold water-bath, the time in seconds will be noted and they will immediately be asked to estimate their pain on a Numerical Rating Scale. A short debriefing will conclude the session.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
The effect of a self-distanced view on pain perception.
The participant will exert self-distanced, third-person self-talk following a cue-card while induced with experimental pain.
Self-distancing, third-person self-talk.
The participants will engage in self-distancing, third-person self-talk.
The effect of a self-immersed view on pain perception.
The participant will exert self-immersed, first-person self-talk following a cue-card while induced with experimental pain.
Self-immersed, first-person self-talk.
The participants will engage in self-immersed, first-person self-talk.
The effect of non-view, self-talk on pain perception.
The participant will exert self-talk following a cue-card while induced with experimental pain.
Distraction
The participants will engage in a distraction task.
Pain perception in induced, experimental pain.
Control group. This group will be induced with experimental pain, but will receive no specific task to exert.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Self-distancing, third-person self-talk.
The participants will engage in self-distancing, third-person self-talk.
Self-immersed, first-person self-talk.
The participants will engage in self-immersed, first-person self-talk.
Distraction
The participants will engage in a distraction task.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Swedish comprehension.
* Age over 18 years old.
* \-
Exclusion Criteria
* Known disease affecting the nervous system.
* Inadequate Swedish comprehension.
* Age under 18 years old.
* \-
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Linnaeus University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Helena Gunnarsson
Senior lecturer
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Helena Gunnarsson, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Linnaeus University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Helena Gunnarsson
Vaxjo, Kronoberg County, Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ayduk, Ö., Kross, E. (2010). Analyzing Negative Experiences Without Ruminating: The Role of Self-Distancing in Enabling Adaptive Self-Reflection. Soc Personal Psychol Compass, 841-854. 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00301.
Loewenstein G. Out of control: visceral influences on behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1996;65(3):272-292.
Mischkowski, D., Kross, E., Bushman, B.J. (2012). Flies on the wall are less aggressive: Self-distancing "in the heat of the moment" reduces aggressive thoughts, angry feelings, and aggressive behavior. J Exp Soc Psychol 48, 1187-1191.
Orvell A, Vickers BD, Drake B, Verduyn P, Ayduk O, Moser J, Jonides J, Kross E. Does distanced Self-Talk Facilitate Emotion Regulation Across a Range of Emotionally Intense Experiences? Clin Psych Sci 2021; 9: 68-78.
Gunnarsson H, Agerstrom J. Pain From a Distance: Can Third-Person Self-Talk Mitigate Pain Sensitivity and Pain Related Distress During Experimentally Induced Pain? Psychol Rep. 2024 Aug 1:332941241269520. doi: 10.1177/00332941241269520. Online ahead of print.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LinneausU
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.