REFINE Study: A Study In a Novel Interspinous Fusion Device In Subjects With Low Back Pain

NCT ID: NCT05504499

Last Updated: 2022-08-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-03-19

Study Completion Date

2028-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the use of Aurora Spine ZIP™ MIS Interspinous Fusion System and bone graft material in fusion in patients with chronic low back pain that present with degenerative disc disease with concurrent neurogenic claudication.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

INTRODUCTION

This study will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the use of Aurora Spine ZIP™ MIS Interspinous Fusion System and bone graft material in single-level fusion in patients with chronic low back pain that present with degenerative disc disease (DDD) with concurrent neurogenic claudication.

Devices included in study are the Aurora Spine ZIP™ MIS Interspinous Fusion System and bone graft material. The device is a bilateral locking plate system which attaches to the spinous processes of the posterior noncervical spine (T1-S1) from an interlaminar approach. The implants have superior and inferior spinous process articulations and a central bone graft chamber.

The Aurora Spine ZIP™ is used to treat DDD (defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies), spondylolisthesis, trauma (i.e., fracture or dislocation), and/or tumor. The studied indication is lumbar degenerative disease resulting in back pain with lower extremity symptoms and neurogenic claudication.

Degenerative disc disease is a common condition of the aging spine, and may contribute to a variety of painful symptoms, including radiculopathy, neurogenic claudication, and back pain. There are a number of mechanical sequelae that result from these degenerative processes of the intervertebral disc, which may manifest in the anterior, middle, and posterior columns of the spine. Symptoms of degenerative disc disease have traditionally been treated with a variety of conservative (pain medications, physical therapy, epidural steroid injections) and invasive (surgical decompression and/or fusion) options(1,2). Interspinous spacers (ISS) have been proven to be effective for neurogenic claudication with 5 year outcome data and robust clinical experience (3). More invasive treatment options for lumbar spinal stenosis include decompressive laminectomies and a variety of approaches to lumbar fusion.

Direct comparison of two year results of ISS and decompressive laminectomies found ISS offers a less invasive treatment that reduces the potential for comorbidities, necessity for future operations, and is less disruptive to the spinal anatomy providing greater options for future surgical interventions with equivalent clinical outcomes (4). The landmark multicenter SPORT trial compared decompressive laminectomy to conservative non-operative care in patients with spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication and found that the surgical group had significantly greater improvement in pain and function at four-year follow-up (5).

A meta-analysis of lumbar fusions for degenerative diseases looked at patient reported outcomes from 65 studies including disability, pain scores, and patient satisfaction. Fusion has been shown to be evidenced for spondylolisthesis, and patients who were randomly assigned to fusion care were 4 times as likely to be satisfied, attained 34% greater pain relief and saw a 40% improvement of preoperative disability when compared to those who received non-operative care (2). Evidence for fusion for stenosis without spondylolisthesis is limited in this meta-analysis, however this did not distinguish among fusion approaches.

Fusion did provide greater relief than non-operative care in patients with chronic low back pain without clinically significant stenosis or spondylolisthesis (2). Five randomized control trials reported results with fusion between 16-18% improved in terms of back and leg pain as compared to non-operative care (2). Anterior interbody fusion (ABF) and posterolateral fusion with pedicle screws (PLF) in patients with discogenic low back pain resulted in a significant decrease in VAS pain scores, with greatest relief following ABF, compared to conservative treatment (6).

3 STUDY PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the use of Aurora Spine ZIP™ MIS Interspinous Fusion System and bone graft material in single-level fusion in patients with chronic low back pain that present with degenerative disc disease with concurrent neurogenic claudication.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

This clinical investigation is a prospective, open-label, non-randomized, multi-center study. It is designed to collect clinical follow-up data on patients undergoing interspinous interlaminar fusion with bone graft performed on an ambulatory basis by interventional pain physicians, orthopedic, and neurosurgeons, as normally performed in the real-world setting.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Single Arm

A Prospective, Open-Label, Non-Randomized, Multi-Center Study Measuring Functional Outcomes In a Novel Interspinous Fusion Device In Subjects With Low Back Pain A Prospective, Observational, Open-Label, Non-Randomized, Multi-Center Study Measuring Functional Outcomes In a Novel Interspinous Fusion Device In Subjects With Low Back Pain

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Interspinous Fusion

Intervention Type DEVICE

The intended study population are adults 18 years or older with symptomatic lumbar degenerative disc disease resulting in back pain with lower extremity symptoms and neurogenic claudication that improves with spinal flexion who are candidates for use of the Zip™ MIS Interspinous Fusion device when undergoing spinal fixation procedures.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Interspinous Fusion

The intended study population are adults 18 years or older with symptomatic lumbar degenerative disc disease resulting in back pain with lower extremity symptoms and neurogenic claudication that improves with spinal flexion who are candidates for use of the Zip™ MIS Interspinous Fusion device when undergoing spinal fixation procedures.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Subject must provide written informed consent prior to any clinical study-related procedure.
2. Subject is at least 18 years or older at the time of enrollment, skeletal mature.
3. Subject has 1-2 symptomatic lumbar degenerative disease at adjacent level, T12-S1, with or without grade I spondylolisthesis (confirmed by history and radiographic studies).
4. MRI within 12 months prior to the procedure with at least mild to moderate spinal stenosis at the index treatment level
5. Subject has undergone at least 3 months of non-operative treatment.
6. Subject presents with ZCQ physical function ≥ 2.0 at baseline.
7. Subject reports relief from lumbar flexion and/or sitting.
8. Subject has baseline VAS of back and/or leg pain standing or walking ≥ 50mm.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Subject is unable to provide written informed consent.
2. Subject has had previous lumbar spine surgery at the intended treatment level (e.g., laminectomy or fusion).
3. Subject has a grade II or greater spondylolisthesis on flexion and extension radiographs with 3mm instability.
4. Subject has confirmed or suspected osteoporosis or osteopenia.
5. Subject is enrolled, or intends to participate, in a clinical drug and/or device study (investigational device, investigational drug, new indication for a device or drug, or additional testing beyond standard of care procedures) which could confound the results of this trial as determined by the investigator.
6. Presence of other anatomic or comorbid conditions, or other medical, social, or psychological conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, could limit the subject's ability to participate in the clinical investigation or to comply with follow-up requirements.
7. Subject is pregnant or nursing.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pacific Research Institute

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Evolve Restorative Center

Santa Rosa, California, United States

Site Status ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

The Raso Pain Center

Jupiter, Florida, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Koga Neurosurgery

Slidell, Louisiana, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

National Spine and Pain Centers

Oxon Hill, Maryland, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Comprehensive & Interventional Pain Management

Henderson, Nevada, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Nevada Advanced Pain Specialists

Reno, Nevada, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Reno Tahoe Pain Associates

Reno, Nevada, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

The Pain Management Center

Voorhees Township, New Jersey, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Premier Pain Treatment Institute

Loveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Center for Interventional Pain and Spine

Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Shelley Trimm, BS

Role: CONTACT

7075085527

Kam Murrell

Role: CONTACT

267.818.9024

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jodie Laprade

Role: primary

561-264-2929

Rachel Englert, RN

Role: primary

985-269-7676

Diamond Wilson

Role: primary

301-485-7400

Shepard Urban

Role: primary

702-990-4530

Rachel Yetter

Role: primary

775-284-8650

Maria Peregrina

Role: primary

775-236-8596

Onoshoze Bossey

Role: primary

609-382-0392

Kathy White

Role: primary

513-454-7246

Ashley Scherer

Role: primary

844-365-7246

Ashley K

Role: backup

844.365.7246

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Falowski SM, Raso LJ, Mangal V, Narizi A, Patterson DG, Danko MD, Justiz R, Vogel RS, Koga S, Josephson Y, Pope JE. A Prospective, Observational, Open-Label, Non-Randomized, Multicenter Study Measuring Functional Outcomes in a Novel Interspinous Fusion Device in Subjects with Low Back Pain: REFINE Study. Pain Ther. 2023 Feb;12(1):187-199. doi: 10.1007/s40122-022-00447-0. Epub 2022 Oct 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36264409 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AUR-ZIP-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)
NCT04073563 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Advanced Materials Science in XLIF Study
NCT03649490 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Titanium vs. PEEK Fusion Devices in 1 Level TLIF
NCT05691062 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION PHASE4
OLIF25™ /OLIF51™ Study
NCT02657421 TERMINATED