Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
300 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-08-19
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Smooth PEEK Interbody Implants in XLIF
Smooth PEEK interbody implants for XLIF (with allograft chips and BMA or cancellous allograft) provide maximum surface area and structural stability with large central apertures to allow bony through-growth. Multiple length options enable optimal apophyseal support, thus reducing the chance of subsidence. Additionally, lordotic profiles are available to induce proper sagittal alignment.
No interventions assigned to this group
3D-Printed Titanium Interbody Implants in XLIF
3D-printed, fully porous titanium interbody implants for XLIF (with allograft chips and BMA or cancellous allograft) have a porous architecture that mimics the porosity and stiffness of bone for reduced stress shielding and improved radiographic imaging. The advanced microporous surface topography creates an ideal environment for bone in-growth.
No interventions assigned to this group
Porous PEEK Interbody Implants in XLIF
Porous PEEK interbody implants for XLIF (with allograft chips and BMA or cancellous allograft) combine the osseointegration capabilities of porous metal implants with the favorable imaging and mechanical properties of traditional PEEK implants. The Porous PEEK architecture, with 60% porosity and 300 mm average pore size, is specifically tailored to elicit the optimal osteogenic cell response and promote bone tissue ingrowth inside the pores, as demonstrated in preclinical studies.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Planned interbody fusion surgery, including at least one level of extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) prior to enrollment in the research at one or two consecutive lumbar levels for degenerative disc disease, including those with up to Grade 2 spondylolisthesis, with one of the following NuVasive, Inc. interbody implants:
1. Coroent® XL PEEK interbody implant; or
2. Modulus® 3D-printed titanium interbody implant; or
3. Cohere® XLIF Porous PEEKTM interbody implant.
If a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion or anterior lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF or ALIF) is planned adjacent to the XLIF level, the same NuVasive, Inc. interbody implant material type must be used as determined by the implant enrollment schedule. For example:
1. Smooth PEEK: Coroent XL PEEK (XLIF) + Coroent L (TLIF) or Coroent XLR (ALIF) or Brigade (ALIF)
2. 3D-printed titanium: Modulus XLIF + Modulus TLIF or Modulus ALIF
3. Porous PEEK: Cohere XLIF + Coalesce TLIF (currently no ALIF option)
3. The planned procedure must include placement of bilateral posterior screw fixation with or without intrafacet fusion using autograft (with or without the assigned allograft used at the XLIF level(s)) at the treated level(s). Direct posterior decompression at the index interbody fusion level(s) is acceptable.
4. Preoperative coronal Cobb angle of \< 10°;
5. Able to undergo surgery based on physical exam, medical history, and surgeon judgment;
6. Understands the conditions of enrollment and willing to sign an informed consent to participate in the evaluation.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Posterior grafting other than the allowed intrafacet fusion at the treated level(s);
3. Revision of prior fusion at treated level(s) (adjacent level interbody fusion is acceptable);
4. XLIF procedure that requires or results in the release of the anterior longitudinal ligament or posterior osteotomy;
5. Preoperative coronal Cobb angle of ≥ 10°;
6. Procedures performed with XLIF interbody implants with integrated vertebral body screw(s);
7. Active smoking six (6) weeks prior to surgery;
8. Systemic or local infection (active or latent);
9. Diseases that significantly inhibit bone healing (e.g., prior diagnosis of osteoporosis, metabolic bone disease, uncontrolled diabetes, dialysis dependent renal failure, symptomatic liver disease);
10. Rheumatoid arthritis or other autoimmune disease that, in the option of the investigator, would interfere with bone healing and/or fusion;
11. Treatment with pharmaceuticals interfering with calcium metabolism;
12. Undergoing chemotherapy or radiation treatment or chronic use of steroids (defined as more than 6 weeks of steroid use within 12 months of surgery or anytime postoperatively, other than episodic use or inhaled corticosteroids);
13. Use of bone stimulators postoperatively;
14. Non-ambulatory, wheelchair-bound;
15. Involvement in active litigation relating to the spine (worker's compensation claim is allowed if it is not contested);
16. Significant general illness (e.g., HIV, active metastatic cancer of any type, uncontrolled diabetes, dialysis dependent renal failure, symptomatic liver disease);
17. Spinal metastases or active spinal tumor malignancy;
18. Immunocompromised or is being treated with immunosuppressive agents;
19. Pregnant, or plans to become pregnant during the study;
20. Mental or physical condition that would limit the ability to comply with study requirements;
21. Prisoners;
22. Participating in another clinical study that would confound study data.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
NuVasive
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kyle Malone, MS
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Globus Medical
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hartford Healthcare Bone and Joint Institute
Hartford, Connecticut, United States
Lyerly Neurosurgery
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
University of South Florida Department of Neurosurgery, Tampa General Hospital
Tampa, Florida, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Orthopaedic Institute of Western Kentucky
Paducah, Kentucky, United States
Suburban Hospital, Johns Hopkins Medicine
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Columbia Orthopedic Group Research
Columbia, Missouri, United States
OrthoCarolina
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Atlantic Brain and Spine
Wilmington, North Carolina, United States
The Spine Clinic of OKC
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
UT Health San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, United States
University of Virginia Health System
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
Evergreen Health
Kirkland, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NUVA.X1801
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id