Machine Learning for Risk Stratification in the Emergency Department (MARS-ED)
NCT ID: NCT05497830
Last Updated: 2024-11-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
1300 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-09-12
2024-11-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Identifying emergency department (ED) patients at high and low risk shortly after admission could help decision-making regarding patient care. Several clinical risk scores and triage systems for stratification of patients have been developed, but often underperform in clinical practice. Moreover, most of these risk scores only have been diagnostically validated in an observational cohort, but never have been evaluated for their actual clinical impact. In a recent retrospective study that was conducted in the Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), a novel clinical risk score, the RISKINDEX, was introduced that predicted 31-day mortality of sepsis patients presenting to an ED. The RISKINDEX hereby also outperformed internal medicine specialists. Observational follow-up studies underlined the potential of the risk score. However, it remains unknown to what extent these models have any beneficial value when it is actually implemented in clinical practice.
Objective
To determine the diagnostic accuracy, policy changes and clinical impact of the RISKINDEX as basis to conduct a large scale, multi-center randomised trial.
Study design
The MARS-ED study is designed as a multi-center, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority pilot clinical trial.
Study population
Adult patients who are assessed and treated by an internal medicine specialist in the ED of whom a minimum of 4 different laboratory results (hematology or clinical chemistry, required for calculation of ML risk score) are available within the first two hours of the ED visit.
Intervention
Physicians will be presented with the ML risk score (the RISKINDEX) of the patients they are actively treating, directly after assessment of regular diagnostics has taken place.
Main study parameters
Primary
\- Diagnostic accuracy, policy changes and clinical impact of a novel clinical risk score (the RISKINDEX)
Secondary
* Policy changes due to presentation of ML score (treatment policy, requesting ancillary investigations, treatment restrictions (i.e., no intubation or resuscitation)
* Intensive care (ICU) and medium care (MC) admission
* Length of admission
* Mortality within 31 days
* Readmission
* Patient preference
* Feasibility of novel clinical risk score
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Standardized Comparison of Triage in EMS
NCT00468780
Role of Provider-at-Triage on ED Efficiency and Quality of Care
NCT02703701
A Study of Emergency Department AI Prediction Impact
NCT05683899
A Validation of Current Hospital Triage Performance System Versus RETTS
NCT02303613
Triage of Children at the Emergency Department: Manchester Triage System or Pediatric Early Warning Score?
NCT02094404
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard care
Routine clinical care. Physicians will actively be asked to self-report their clinical impression of each included patient and policy will be monitored.
No interventions assigned to this group
RISKINDEX
Routine clinical care. Physicians will actively be asked to self-report their clinical impression of each included patient and policy will be monitored. In the intervention group, physicians will be presented with the RISKINDEX. Subsequently, self-report will again be initiated to evaluate the physicians' response to the ML score and possible policy changes due to the intervention.
RISK-INDEX
Presentation of RISKINDEX to the physician after approximately 2 hours. The ML RISKINDEX is a prediction model based on laboratory data from the ED. It is based on date of birth, sex and at least four laboratory data which are sampled within the first two hours of the ED visit. Laboratory data that are used as input include samples that are commonly drawn in patients that require treatment from an internal medicine physician, such as urea, albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), lactate and bilirubin.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
RISK-INDEX
Presentation of RISKINDEX to the physician after approximately 2 hours. The ML RISKINDEX is a prediction model based on laboratory data from the ED. It is based on date of birth, sex and at least four laboratory data which are sampled within the first two hours of the ED visit. Laboratory data that are used as input include samples that are commonly drawn in patients that require treatment from an internal medicine physician, such as urea, albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), lactate and bilirubin.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Assessed and treated by an internal medicine specialist (gastroenterologists included) in the ED
* Willing to give written consent, either directly or after deferred consent procedure (see section 11.2).
Exclusion Criteria
* Unwilling to provide written consent, either directly or after deferred consent procedure (see section 11.2).
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Maastricht University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Steven Meex, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Maastricht University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Maastricht University Medical Centre
Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
van Dam PMEL, van Doorn WPTM, van Gils F, Sevenich L, Lambriks L, Meex SJR, Cals JWL, Stassen PM. Machine learning for risk stratification in the emergency department (MARS-ED) study protocol for a randomized controlled pilot trial on the implementation of a prediction model based on machine learning technology predicting 31-day mortality in the emergency department. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Jan 23;32(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01177-2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
METC 21-068
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
NL78478.068.21
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.