Machine Learning for Risk Stratification in the Emergency Department (MARS-ED)

NCT ID: NCT05497830

Last Updated: 2024-11-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-09-12

Study Completion Date

2024-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Rationale

Identifying emergency department (ED) patients at high and low risk shortly after admission could help decision-making regarding patient care. Several clinical risk scores and triage systems for stratification of patients have been developed, but often underperform in clinical practice. Moreover, most of these risk scores only have been diagnostically validated in an observational cohort, but never have been evaluated for their actual clinical impact. In a recent retrospective study that was conducted in the Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), a novel clinical risk score, the RISKINDEX, was introduced that predicted 31-day mortality of sepsis patients presenting to an ED. The RISKINDEX hereby also outperformed internal medicine specialists. Observational follow-up studies underlined the potential of the risk score. However, it remains unknown to what extent these models have any beneficial value when it is actually implemented in clinical practice.

Objective

To determine the diagnostic accuracy, policy changes and clinical impact of the RISKINDEX as basis to conduct a large scale, multi-center randomised trial.

Study design

The MARS-ED study is designed as a multi-center, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority pilot clinical trial.

Study population

Adult patients who are assessed and treated by an internal medicine specialist in the ED of whom a minimum of 4 different laboratory results (hematology or clinical chemistry, required for calculation of ML risk score) are available within the first two hours of the ED visit.

Intervention

Physicians will be presented with the ML risk score (the RISKINDEX) of the patients they are actively treating, directly after assessment of regular diagnostics has taken place.

Main study parameters

Primary

\- Diagnostic accuracy, policy changes and clinical impact of a novel clinical risk score (the RISKINDEX)

Secondary

* Policy changes due to presentation of ML score (treatment policy, requesting ancillary investigations, treatment restrictions (i.e., no intubation or resuscitation)
* Intensive care (ICU) and medium care (MC) admission
* Length of admission
* Mortality within 31 days
* Readmission
* Patient preference
* Feasibility of novel clinical risk score

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

See our protocol paper, PMID 38263188

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Pain Emergencies

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard care

Routine clinical care. Physicians will actively be asked to self-report their clinical impression of each included patient and policy will be monitored.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

RISKINDEX

Routine clinical care. Physicians will actively be asked to self-report their clinical impression of each included patient and policy will be monitored. In the intervention group, physicians will be presented with the RISKINDEX. Subsequently, self-report will again be initiated to evaluate the physicians' response to the ML score and possible policy changes due to the intervention.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

RISK-INDEX

Intervention Type OTHER

Presentation of RISKINDEX to the physician after approximately 2 hours. The ML RISKINDEX is a prediction model based on laboratory data from the ED. It is based on date of birth, sex and at least four laboratory data which are sampled within the first two hours of the ED visit. Laboratory data that are used as input include samples that are commonly drawn in patients that require treatment from an internal medicine physician, such as urea, albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), lactate and bilirubin.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

RISK-INDEX

Presentation of RISKINDEX to the physician after approximately 2 hours. The ML RISKINDEX is a prediction model based on laboratory data from the ED. It is based on date of birth, sex and at least four laboratory data which are sampled within the first two hours of the ED visit. Laboratory data that are used as input include samples that are commonly drawn in patients that require treatment from an internal medicine physician, such as urea, albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), lactate and bilirubin.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult, defined as ≥ 18 years of age
* Assessed and treated by an internal medicine specialist (gastroenterologists included) in the ED
* Willing to give written consent, either directly or after deferred consent procedure (see section 11.2).

Exclusion Criteria

* \<4 different laboratory results available (hematology or clinical chemistry) within the first two hours of the ED visit (calculation ML prediction score otherwise not possible)
* Unwilling to provide written consent, either directly or after deferred consent procedure (see section 11.2).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Maastricht University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Steven Meex, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Maastricht University Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Maastricht University Medical Centre

Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

van Dam PMEL, van Doorn WPTM, van Gils F, Sevenich L, Lambriks L, Meex SJR, Cals JWL, Stassen PM. Machine learning for risk stratification in the emergency department (MARS-ED) study protocol for a randomized controlled pilot trial on the implementation of a prediction model based on machine learning technology predicting 31-day mortality in the emergency department. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Jan 23;32(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01177-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38263188 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

METC 21-068

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NL78478.068.21

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.