Analysis of Balance and Functional Hop Tests in Athletes With Lower Extremity Injuries by Dual Task Study

NCT ID: NCT05484778

Last Updated: 2025-08-13

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

39 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-09-28

Study Completion Date

2022-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Functional Hop tests and balance measurements are frequently used to decide on returning to sports after lower extremity injuries. Although the athletes show proficiency in these tests and measurements, re-injuries occur when returning to sports. The causes of these re-injuries are mostly functional deficiencies such as inadequate neuromuscular control and stability.

In the competition or sports environment, especially in team games, the athlete also shows cognitive performance, such as communication with teammates and following the game, which are included in the game setup, as well as the physical performance. Performing many tasks or performances at the same time divides the focus of attention on the activities performed, and if the person cannot adequately meet the attention demands, the quality of one or more of the tasks performed will deteriorate. As the level of expertise in the sport increases, the athlete tends to manage his posture, balance and movement with automatic postural control and can focus his attention on a new task.

The concept of focus of attention has been evaluated from different perspectives over time. If it is examined in terms of direction; It is divided into two as the internal focus of attention, which is used by focusing on body movements during the performance of the person, and the external focus of attention, which is used by focusing on the effect of the movement during the performance of the person. As the investigators planned in this study, a second cognitive task assigned to the participant simultaneously during his or her physical performance acts as an external focus of attention, allowing movement control during performance to be carried out by unconscious or automatic processes.

The investigators's aim; It is to examine the balance and functional hop tests that the investigator will apply in athletes by combining them with a simultaneous dual cognitive task that will reflect the field conditions more realistically. In the meantime, investigators think that with the sharing of our results with the literature, it can contribute to both the decision-making processes to return to sports after injury and preventive rehabilitation programs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

As a result of this study, the possible changes in balance and functional jump performances of athletes who have previously had unilateral lower extremity injuries will be examined with the dual-task paradigm. In line with these results, it will be possible to comment on the balance and functional hop test performances of the athletes together with the cognitive task. Balance measurements and functional performance evaluations are used in the decision to return to sports after previous injuries. After the measurements, the affected and unaffected side are compared and an evaluation is made. However, even with these tests and evaluations, athletes are injured again when they return to sports. One of the reasons for this may be that the protective and controlled environment applied during rehabilitation is less challenging and requires less attention when compared to the competitive and sports environment in which the person is involved. For this reason, the investigator think that the evaluations and tests used in the decision to return to sports include both cognitive and physical performance by forcing the attention demands of the person, and it may be more effective in determining the real performance of the person. Thus, the use of physical assessments applied with simultaneous cognitive tasks can be used in the evaluation of the athletes during the return to sports by calculating the possible measurement differences between the affected and unaffected sides compared to the classical procedure, and in the planning of preventive rehabilitation programs of the athletes if there is a decrease in performance in the measurements applied as a dual task. It also contributes to studies that examine performance together with the dual task previously applied to athletes. Secondly, by examining the relationship between balance and functional hop test parameters, it will be determined how effective the independent variables are on each other. If the performance of individuals who have had a previous injury change with the dual task and the mechanisms of these possible changes are known, protective and performance-enhancing strategies can be developed, the cognitive and physical preparation of the athletes for the sports environment can be accelerated, and the risks of re-injury of the athletes can be reduced, as a result of which medical costs can be reduced.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Athletic Injuries Knee Injuries Ankle Injuries Hip Injuries Ankle Sprains Reinjuries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Case Group

This group consists of athletes whose are between the ages of 14-30 and are still active at high school or university level in sports involving sudden changes of direction and jump physically and who have a history of injury to only one lower extremity before.

Group Type OTHER

Dual tasking paradigm

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The dual task methodology is a testing model that requires one person to perform two tasks at the same time. The dual task is divided into two as motor-motor or motor-cognitive. Dual tasks provide an opportunity to examine the attention demands of both tasks and allow possible interference to be observed. The idea behind this design is that central processing capacity has a limit and must be distributed among concurrent tasks.

Control Group

This group consists of athletes whose age range is 14-30, and who are still active at high school or university level in sports involving sudden changes of direction and jump physically and who do not have a history of lower extremity injuries.

Group Type OTHER

Dual tasking paradigm

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The dual task methodology is a testing model that requires one person to perform two tasks at the same time. The dual task is divided into two as motor-motor or motor-cognitive. Dual tasks provide an opportunity to examine the attention demands of both tasks and allow possible interference to be observed. The idea behind this design is that central processing capacity has a limit and must be distributed among concurrent tasks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dual tasking paradigm

The dual task methodology is a testing model that requires one person to perform two tasks at the same time. The dual task is divided into two as motor-motor or motor-cognitive. Dual tasks provide an opportunity to examine the attention demands of both tasks and allow possible interference to be observed. The idea behind this design is that central processing capacity has a limit and must be distributed among concurrent tasks.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Having a history of injury to only one lower extremity before
* Having to stay away from sports activities for at least 1 week and maximum 6 weeks after the injury.
* Not having a lower extremity injury in the last 6 months
* Age range of 14-30 and still being active at high school or university level in sports involving sudden changes of direction and jumping physically

Exclusion Criteria

* Bilateral lower extremity injury history
* Pregnancy
* Vestibular, respiratory and visual disturbances
* Diabetes
* Auditory or cognitive deficit
* Use of drugs that affect balance, cognition and attention
* Pain in the affected lower extremity (at least 2/10 according to the VAS -Visual Analogue Scale-)
* Lower extremity or waist operation history
* Conditions or neurological disorders that may affect balance
* Head trauma or symptoms related to head trauma
Minimum Eligible Age

14 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

30 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Istanbul University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Aysen Elif Yılmaz

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Istanbul University

Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IU-ELIF-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.