EPPIC-Net: Novaremed Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy ISA

NCT ID: NCT05480228

Last Updated: 2025-12-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

127 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-09-21

Study Completion Date

2025-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of the current hard gelatin capsule formulation of NRD135S.E1 80 mg once daily in the treatment of PDPN when administered for 13 weeks.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This ISA describes a double-blind Phase II study of the PK/PD, safety, tolerability, and effect of 13 weeks of NRD135S.E1 (80mg/day) as an ISA within the context of the Platform Protocol to Assess Treatments for Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy, EN21-PP. The ISA is intended to be read and interpreted within the context of the Platform Protocol and focuses on the description of design features that are specific to NRD135S.E1.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This study is an interventional, prospective, parallel-group, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 2 study.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
Randomization assignment will be blinded from study participants, staff from clinical sites, investigators, asset owner, IND sponsors, and/or designees.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

NRD135S.E1 80mg/day

NRD135S.E1 as a potential treatment for moderate to severe painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN). While the activity of NRD135S.E1 has been extensively studied, its molecular target is not known, though it does not appear to work through any of the opioid receptors or molecular pathways currently targeted by available analgesics. The best evidence suggests it may act, at least in part, through modulating the Lyn kinase signaling pathway In clinical studies, NRD135S.E1 has been well tolerated at all dose levels tested in single-dose (up to 1,200 mg) and repeat-dose regimens (up to 300 mg/day over 5 days or 150 mg over 3 weeks), and it has been shown to have predictable pharmacokinetics with dose-dependent increases in exposure.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

NRD135SE.1

Intervention Type DRUG

The double-blind treatment phase is up to 13 weeks.

Matching placebo

A matching placebo comparator will be used.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

A matching placebo will be taken for up to 13 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

NRD135SE.1

The double-blind treatment phase is up to 13 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

A matching placebo will be taken for up to 13 weeks.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

NRD135s.E1, a small chemical entity for treatment of neuropathic pain

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Provides written consent for the EN21-01 ISA. Legally Authorized Representatives (LARs) are not allowed, but impartial witnesses may be utilized as needed for visually impaired participants.
2. Patient-reported daily 11-point NRS (for average pain over the last 24 hours) meets the criteria specified in "Appendix B: Blinded Information" during both the 7-day screening and 7-day baseline periods. The algorithm will be assessed centrally.


1. Diagnosis of alcohol or substance abuse or dependence (other than nicotine or caffeine) within the 2 years before the Screening visit. \*\*This criterion is more stringent than a related Platform Protocol criterion.\*\*
2. Moderate or severe renal impairment, known (documented) or defined as an estimated/calculated creatinine clearance/estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \< 45 mL/min/1.73 m2, according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula during the screening process. \*\*This criterion is more stringent than a related Platform Protocol criterion.\*\*
3. Any of the following conditions related to corrected QT intervals using Fridericia's formula (QTcF):

1. A QTcF \> 500 ms prior to starting IP, up to and including the V3 pre-dose ECG.
2. A history of the following additional risk factors for torsade de pointes: heart failure, hypokalemia, history or family history of long QT syndrome.
4. History of myocardial infarction, other clinically active significant heart disease, or stroke. \*\*This criterion is more stringent than a related Platform Protocol criterion.\*\*
5. Participants known to have participated in four or more studies for investigational pain drugs.
6. Participants known to be non-responders to more than three previous neuropathic pain medications at adequate doses over at least 4 weeks. Adequate doses (given as total daily doses) are defined as follows: 1,800 mg gabapentin; 300 mg pregabalin; opioid analgesics 60 mg oxycodone equivalent or 200 mg tramadol; 75 mg amitriptyline or equivalent tricyclic antidepressant; 60 mg duloxetine; 150 mg venlafaxine.
7. Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any excipients of the study drug formulation.
8. Taking prohibited medications as described in Appendix A, "Prohibited Medications."
9. Major depressive episode within the 6 months before screening and/or a history of diagnosed recurrent major depressive disorder within two years. Any of the following conditions related to suicidality:

1. Any suicidal ideation with intent, with or without a plan, at screening, i.e., answering "yes" to questions 4 or 5 on the Suicidal Ideation section of the Baseline/Screening version of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS);
2. Answering "yes" on any item of the Suicidal Behavior Section (except for the "non-suicidal self-injurious behavior") of the C-SSRS if this behavior occurred in the past 2 years;
3. A lifetime history of suicide attempt (V1).
10. Previous known or possible exposure to NRD135S.E1.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

New York University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

James P. Rathmell, MD

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

James P. Rathmell, MD

Chair, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jessica Robinson-Papp, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California, San Diego

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

South Lake Pain Institute

Clermont, Florida, United States

Site Status

SIMEDHealth LLC

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

University of Florida

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Northwestern Department of Neurology

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Healthcare Research Network (Flossmoor)

Flossmoor, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University of Kansas Medical Center

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

University of Maryland - Baltimore

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

MGH Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Healthcare Research Network (Hazelwood)

Hazelwood, Missouri, United States

Site Status

NYU Langone Manhattan

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Mount Sinai School of Medicine

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Columbia University Medical Center/Neurological Institute

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

University of Rochester

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Clinical Inquest Center

Beavercreek, Ohio, United States

Site Status

University of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Low Country Pain Center

Orangeburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

American Indian Clinical Trials Research Network

Rapid City, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Nerve and Muscle Center of Texas

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Clinicore International

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Utah School of Medicine

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Eastern Virginia Medical School

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

VCU Department of Neurology

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

University of Washington

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

University of Wisconsin

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Peirce-Sandner S, McDermott MP, Farrar JT, Hertz S, Katz NP, Raja SN, Rappaport BA. Placebo and treatment group responses in postherpetic neuralgia vs. painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy clinical trials in the REPORT database. Pain. 2010 Jul;150(1):12-16. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.02.002. Epub 2010 Mar 3. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20202753 (View on PubMed)

Tarpey T, Petkova E, Ciarleglio A, Ogden RT. Extracting scalar measures from functional data with applications to placebo response. Stat Interface. 2021;14(3):255-265. doi: 10.4310/20-sii633.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34316322 (View on PubMed)

Tarpey T, Petkova E, Lu Y, Govindarajulu U. Optimal Partitioning for Linear Mixed Effects Models: Applications to Identifying Placebo Responders. J Am Stat Assoc. 2010 Jan 1;105(491):968-977. doi: 10.1198/jasa.2010.ap08713.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21494314 (View on PubMed)

Van Buuren, S., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). Journal of Statistical Software mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R (Vol. 45). http://www.jstatsoft.org/

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

OT2NS122680-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

2022P002381 (EN21-01)

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.