EPPIC-Net: Novaremed Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy ISA
NCT ID: NCT05480228
Last Updated: 2025-12-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
127 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-09-21
2025-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
EPPIC-Net: Platform Protocol to Assess Treatments for Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
NCT05476276
Clinical Trial Designed to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of EMA401 in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
NCT02435199
Efficacy and Safety of CNV2197944 Versus Placebo in Patients With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
NCT01893125
Study to Evaluate MK-6096 in the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN) in Adults (MK-6096-021)
NCT01564459
A Study for Treatment of Pain in Patients With Diabetic Neuropathy.
NCT00785577
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
NRD135S.E1 80mg/day
NRD135S.E1 as a potential treatment for moderate to severe painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN). While the activity of NRD135S.E1 has been extensively studied, its molecular target is not known, though it does not appear to work through any of the opioid receptors or molecular pathways currently targeted by available analgesics. The best evidence suggests it may act, at least in part, through modulating the Lyn kinase signaling pathway In clinical studies, NRD135S.E1 has been well tolerated at all dose levels tested in single-dose (up to 1,200 mg) and repeat-dose regimens (up to 300 mg/day over 5 days or 150 mg over 3 weeks), and it has been shown to have predictable pharmacokinetics with dose-dependent increases in exposure.
NRD135SE.1
The double-blind treatment phase is up to 13 weeks.
Matching placebo
A matching placebo comparator will be used.
Placebo
A matching placebo will be taken for up to 13 weeks.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
NRD135SE.1
The double-blind treatment phase is up to 13 weeks.
Placebo
A matching placebo will be taken for up to 13 weeks.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patient-reported daily 11-point NRS (for average pain over the last 24 hours) meets the criteria specified in "Appendix B: Blinded Information" during both the 7-day screening and 7-day baseline periods. The algorithm will be assessed centrally.
1. Diagnosis of alcohol or substance abuse or dependence (other than nicotine or caffeine) within the 2 years before the Screening visit. \*\*This criterion is more stringent than a related Platform Protocol criterion.\*\*
2. Moderate or severe renal impairment, known (documented) or defined as an estimated/calculated creatinine clearance/estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \< 45 mL/min/1.73 m2, according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula during the screening process. \*\*This criterion is more stringent than a related Platform Protocol criterion.\*\*
3. Any of the following conditions related to corrected QT intervals using Fridericia's formula (QTcF):
1. A QTcF \> 500 ms prior to starting IP, up to and including the V3 pre-dose ECG.
2. A history of the following additional risk factors for torsade de pointes: heart failure, hypokalemia, history or family history of long QT syndrome.
4. History of myocardial infarction, other clinically active significant heart disease, or stroke. \*\*This criterion is more stringent than a related Platform Protocol criterion.\*\*
5. Participants known to have participated in four or more studies for investigational pain drugs.
6. Participants known to be non-responders to more than three previous neuropathic pain medications at adequate doses over at least 4 weeks. Adequate doses (given as total daily doses) are defined as follows: 1,800 mg gabapentin; 300 mg pregabalin; opioid analgesics 60 mg oxycodone equivalent or 200 mg tramadol; 75 mg amitriptyline or equivalent tricyclic antidepressant; 60 mg duloxetine; 150 mg venlafaxine.
7. Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any excipients of the study drug formulation.
8. Taking prohibited medications as described in Appendix A, "Prohibited Medications."
9. Major depressive episode within the 6 months before screening and/or a history of diagnosed recurrent major depressive disorder within two years. Any of the following conditions related to suicidality:
1. Any suicidal ideation with intent, with or without a plan, at screening, i.e., answering "yes" to questions 4 or 5 on the Suicidal Ideation section of the Baseline/Screening version of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS);
2. Answering "yes" on any item of the Suicidal Behavior Section (except for the "non-suicidal self-injurious behavior") of the C-SSRS if this behavior occurred in the past 2 years;
3. A lifetime history of suicide attempt (V1).
10. Previous known or possible exposure to NRD135S.E1.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
New York University
OTHER
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
NIH
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
OTHER
James P. Rathmell, MD
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
James P. Rathmell, MD
Chair, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jessica Robinson-Papp, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California, San Diego
San Diego, California, United States
South Lake Pain Institute
Clermont, Florida, United States
SIMEDHealth LLC
Gainesville, Florida, United States
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Northwestern Department of Neurology
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Healthcare Research Network (Flossmoor)
Flossmoor, Illinois, United States
University of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
University of Maryland - Baltimore
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
MGH Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Healthcare Research Network (Hazelwood)
Hazelwood, Missouri, United States
NYU Langone Manhattan
New York, New York, United States
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
New York, New York, United States
Columbia University Medical Center/Neurological Institute
New York, New York, United States
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, United States
Clinical Inquest Center
Beavercreek, Ohio, United States
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Low Country Pain Center
Orangeburg, South Carolina, United States
American Indian Clinical Trials Research Network
Rapid City, South Dakota, United States
Nerve and Muscle Center of Texas
Houston, Texas, United States
Clinicore International
Houston, Texas, United States
University of Utah School of Medicine
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Eastern Virginia Medical School
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
VCU Department of Neurology
Richmond, Virginia, United States
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, United States
University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Peirce-Sandner S, McDermott MP, Farrar JT, Hertz S, Katz NP, Raja SN, Rappaport BA. Placebo and treatment group responses in postherpetic neuralgia vs. painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy clinical trials in the REPORT database. Pain. 2010 Jul;150(1):12-16. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.02.002. Epub 2010 Mar 3. No abstract available.
Tarpey T, Petkova E, Ciarleglio A, Ogden RT. Extracting scalar measures from functional data with applications to placebo response. Stat Interface. 2021;14(3):255-265. doi: 10.4310/20-sii633.
Tarpey T, Petkova E, Lu Y, Govindarajulu U. Optimal Partitioning for Linear Mixed Effects Models: Applications to Identifying Placebo Responders. J Am Stat Assoc. 2010 Jan 1;105(491):968-977. doi: 10.1198/jasa.2010.ap08713.
Van Buuren, S., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). Journal of Statistical Software mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R (Vol. 45). http://www.jstatsoft.org/
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2022P002381 (EN21-01)
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.