Safety and Efficacy of EMA401 in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy (PDN)

NCT ID: NCT03297294

Last Updated: 2021-10-08

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

142 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-03-14

Study Completion Date

2019-03-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate safety and efficacy of EMA401 compared to placebo in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This was an interventional, randomized, parallel, placebo-controlled, double-blind treatment study consisting of 3 periods i.e. Screening, Treatment, and Treatment withdrawal. Patients were planned to be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to Placebo b.i.d. or EMA401 100 mg b.i.d.. Concomitant use of pregabalin or duloxetine at stable doses was allowed. Based on historical data, it was planned that the study would enroll approximately 50% of patients who were on stable doses of concomitant pregabalin or duloxetine in the study. At the end of treatment period the 100mg b.i.d. arm was re-randomized (1:1) to the same treatment or placebo. Placebo arm stayed on placebo. The planned duration of treatment period was 12 weeks and 1 week of treatment withdrawal at the end of treatment period.

The study was terminated early due to pre-clinical toxicity data that became available after start of trial. Novartis implemented a Urgent Safety Measure (USM) which instructed sites to discontinue study treatment immediately and to have all patients return for additional laboratory assessments (full hematology including coagulation and clinical chemistry panel). Safety data from the USM was presented as a separate outcome measure table and not included in the Adverse Event section

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

EMA401

During the treatment epoch, patients will receive EMA401 for 12 weeks. During the treatment withdrawal epoch, patients will receive EMA401 or matching placebo for 1 week.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

EMA401

Intervention Type DRUG

capsules, oral

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo to EMA401 capsules, oral

Placebo

Participants will receive matching placebo to EMA401 during both the treatment and treatment withdrawal epochs for a total of 13 weeks.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo to EMA401 capsules, oral

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

EMA401

capsules, oral

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Placebo to EMA401 capsules, oral

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* At the time of Screening, must have had documented diagnosis of Type I OR Type II diabetes mellitus (DM) with painful distal symmetrical sensorimotor neuropathy (ICD-10 code G63.2) of more than 6 months duration with any one or more of the following:

* Neuropathic symptoms (e.g. numbness, non-painful paresthesias or tingling, non-painful sensory distortions or misinterpretations, etc.)
* Decreased distal sensation (e.g. decreased vibration, pinprick sensation, light touch, etc.)
* Been assessed as suffering from moderate to severe neuropathic pain across the Screening epoch (NRS ≥ 4).
* A score of ≥4 on the Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions (DN4) questionnaire at Screening.

Exclusion Criteria

* Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, unless they were using highly effective methods of contraception during dosing and for 3 days after stopping of study medication. Highly effective contraception methods included:

* Total abstinence (when this was is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject). Periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods) and withdrawal were not acceptable methods of contraception.
* Female sterilization (have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy or tubal ligation at least six weeks before taking investigational drug. In case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman had been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment.
* Male sterilization (at least 6 months prior to screening). For female subjects on the study, the vasectomized male partner should have been the sole partner for that subject.
* Placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS).
* History or current diagnosis of electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities indicating significant risk of safety for patients participating in the study.
* Major depressive episode within 6 months prior to Screening and/or a history of diagnosed recurrent major depressive disorder according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-V) diagnostic criteria.
* Had evidence of significant renal insufficiency or pre-existing liver condition.
* Had platelets ≤ 100 x 10\^9/L, or neutrophil count \< 1.2 x 10\^9/L (or equivalent), hemoglobin ≤ 100 g/L for women or hemoglobin ≤ 110 g/L for men.
* Participants whose glycemic control had been unstable within 3 months immediately prior to screening (e.g., ketoacidosis requiring hospitalization, any recent episode of hypoglycemia requiring assistance through medical intervention, uncontrolled hyperglycemia)
* Patients who had any differential diagnosis of PDN including but not limited to other neuropathies (e.g. Vitamin B12 deficiency, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy), polyradiculopathies, central disorders (e.g. demyelinating disease), or rheumatological disease (e.g., foot arthritis, plantar fasciitis).
* Patient was unwilling or unable to complete daily eDiary.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Novartis Investigative Site

Broadmeadow, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Orange, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Heidelberg Heights, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Klagenfurt, , Austria

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Edegem, , Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Pellenberg, , Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Sofia, Sofia-Grad, Bulgaria

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Ontario, CAN, Canada

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Thornhill, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Laval, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Gentofte Municipality, , Denmark

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Odense C, , Denmark

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Tampere, , Finland

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Boulogne-Billancourt, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bielefeld, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Düsseldorf, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Halle, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kassel, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Wiesbaden, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Debrecen, HUN, Hungary

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Esztergom, HUN, Hungary

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Szeged, HUN, Hungary

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Balatonfüred, , Hungary

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kistarcsa, , Hungary

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Pécs, , Hungary

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Krakow, POL, Poland

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Caldas da Rainha, , Portugal

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Matosinhos Municipality, , Portugal

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Viana do Castelo, , Portugal

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Vila Nova de Gaia, , Portugal

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lučenec, Slovak Republic, Slovakia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Prešov, , Slovakia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Prešov, , Slovakia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Seville, Andalusia, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bradford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bath, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bournemouth, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Edinburgh, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Middlesbrough, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Oldham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia Austria Belgium Bulgaria Canada Denmark Finland France Germany Hungary Norway Poland Portugal Slovakia Spain United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rice ASC, Dworkin RH, Finnerup NB, Attal N, Anand P, Freeman R, Piaia A, Callegari F, Doerr C, Mondal S, Narayanan N, Ecochard L, Flossbach Y, Pandhi S. Efficacy and safety of EMA401 in peripheral neuropathic pain: results of 2 randomised, double-blind, phase 2 studies in patients with postherpetic neuralgia and painful diabetic neuropathy. Pain. 2021 Oct 1;162(10):2578-2589. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002252.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33675631 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.novctrd.com/ctrdweb/patientsummary/patientsummaries?patientSummaryId=619

A Plain Language Trial Summary is available on novartisclinicaltrials.com

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016-000281-39

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CEMA401A2202

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.