Dose Response Study of EMA401 in Patients With Post-herpetic Neuralgia (PHN)

NCT ID: NCT03094195

Last Updated: 2021-10-08

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

130 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-06-27

Study Completion Date

2019-03-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study was designed to characterize dose response, and evaluate safety and efficacy of three different doses of EMA401 compared to placebo in patients with post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This was an interventional, randomized, parallel, placebo-controlled, dose ranging, double-blind treatment study consisting of 3 periods i.e. Screening, Treatment, and Treatment withdrawal. The study was planned in two cohorts. The initial cohort had three treatment arms i.e. Placebo b.i.d., EMA401 25 mg b.i.d., or EMA401 100 mg b.i.d. Following an unblinded safety review by an independent DMC, the second cohort was to have been initiated with an additional treatment arm i.e. EMA401 300 mg b.i.d.. Due to the premature study termination, the second cohort was not initiated. At the end of treatment period the 25mg BID and 100mg BID arms were re-randomized (1:1) to the same treatment or placebo. Placebo arm stayed on placebo. The planned duration of treatment period was 12 weeks and 1 week of treatment withdrawal at the end of treatment period. The study was terminated early due to pre-clinical toxicity data that became available after start of trial. Novartis implemented a Urgent Safety Measure (USM) which instructed sites to discontinue study treatment immediately and to have all patients return for additional laboratory assessments (full hematology including coagulation and clinical chemistry panel). Safety data from the USM was presented as a separate outcome measure table and not included in the Adverse Event section.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Post-herpetic Neuralgia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

EMA401 25mg BID

Ema401 25 mg was administered orally twice a day

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

EMA401

Intervention Type DRUG

EMA401

EMA401 100mg BID

Ema401 100 mg was administered orally twice a day

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

EMA401

Intervention Type DRUG

EMA401

Placebo BID

Matching placebo capsules administered orally twice a day

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

EMA401

EMA401

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* At the time of Screening, must have had documented diagnosis of PHN (ICD-10 code B02.29), defined as pain in the region of the rash persisting for more than 6 months after onset of herpes zoster rash.
* Assessed as suffering from moderate to severe neuropathic pain across the Screening epoch (NRS ≥ 4).
* Patients must have had documented past and/or ongoing inadequate treatment response (having insufficient pain relief with treatment or inability to tolerate) to at least 2 different prescribed therapies commonly used to treat and considered effective by the Investigator for the treatment of PHN.
* Patient must have been willing to complete daily eDiary

Exclusion Criteria

* History or had current diagnosis of electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities indicating significant risk of safety for patients participating in the study
* Had a major depressive episode within 6 months prior to Screening and/or a history of diagnosed recurrent major depressive disorder according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-V) diagnostic criteria
* Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant.
* Had evidence of significant renal insufficiency or pre-existing liver condition
* Had platelets ≤ 100 x 10\^9/L, or neutrophil count \< 1.2 x 10\^9/L (or equivalent), hemoglobin ≤ 100 g/L for women or hemoglobin ≤ 110 g/L for men.
* Patients who had a known diagnosis of diabetes and are stable on medication with a hemoglobin A1c \> 8%. Those who did not have a known diagnosis of diabetes with a hemoglobin A1c \> 7%.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Novartis Investigative Site

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Klagenfurt, , Austria

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Pellenberg, , Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Ontario, CAN, Canada

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lévis, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Choceň, , Czechia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Plzen-Bory, , Czechia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Odense C, , Denmark

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Boulogne-Billancourt, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lille Cédex, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Nice, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Erlangen, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Haar, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Wiesbaden, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Esztergom, HUN, Hungary

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kistarcsa, , Hungary

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Nishinomiya, Hyōgo, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Sakai, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kawaguchi, Saitama, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Shizuoka, Shizuoka, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kasukabe-shi, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Setagaya Ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Ōita, , Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Olsztyn, , Poland

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Almada, , Portugal

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Aveiro, , Portugal

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Leiria, , Portugal

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Dubnica nad Váhom, SVK, Slovakia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Banská Bystrica, , Slovakia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Prešov, , Slovakia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Spišská Nová Ves, , Slovakia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Tainan City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Darlington, Durham, United Kingdom

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

London, GBR, United Kingdom

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Liverpool, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia Austria Belgium Canada Czechia Denmark France Germany Hungary Italy Japan Norway Poland Portugal Slovakia South Korea Spain Taiwan United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rice ASC, Dworkin RH, Finnerup NB, Attal N, Anand P, Freeman R, Piaia A, Callegari F, Doerr C, Mondal S, Narayanan N, Ecochard L, Flossbach Y, Pandhi S. Efficacy and safety of EMA401 in peripheral neuropathic pain: results of 2 randomised, double-blind, phase 2 studies in patients with postherpetic neuralgia and painful diabetic neuropathy. Pain. 2021 Oct 1;162(10):2578-2589. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002252.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33675631 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.novctrd.com/ctrdweb/patientsummary/patientsummaries?patientSummaryId=623

A Plain Language Trial Summary is available on novartisclinicaltrials.com

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CEMA401A2201

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

RN624 For Pain Of Post-Herpetic Neuralgia
NCT00568321 COMPLETED PHASE2
Duloxetine for PHN
NCT04313335 COMPLETED NA
ACD440 Gel in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
NCT05416931 COMPLETED PHASE2