Pre-Hospital Lung Ultrasound Impact on Diagnosis

NCT ID: NCT05461547

Last Updated: 2025-06-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

SUSPENDED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

107 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-02-09

Study Completion Date

2028-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Acute heart failure (AHF) is a major reason patients seek emergency care and is a significant public health burden. The ability to differentiate AHF from other etiologies of dyspnea remains a challenge as symptoms and physical exam findings overlap, especially in the pre-hospital setting where diagnostic tools are not readily available. The inability to differentiate AHF from other causes of dyspnea leads to misdiagnosis, delays in diagnosis, and ultimately delays in appropriate treatment. Delays in initiating HF therapies is associated with poor outcomes including higher rates of in-hospital mortality and longer hospital length of stay. Optimizing treatment for AHF in the pre-hospital setting is associated with increased survival and lower rates of hospital re-admission. Thus, accurate diagnosis and early treatment for AHF in the pre-hospital setting remains a critical unmet need. Lung ultrasound (LUS), through assessment of B-lines, allows for an easy and accurate method for detection of pulmonary congestion seen in AHF patients. Although multiple studies have shown LUS is easy to learn, there is a paucity of data assessing clinical impact of LUS in the pre-hospital setting. The investigators hypothesize that the use of LUS by pre-hospital personnel will improve accuracy for detecting AHF in the pre-hospital setting when compared to usual care (no LUS).

Specific Aims: To determine if the use of pre-hospital LUS improves diagnostic accuracy for detecting AHF in patients transported by emergency medical services (EMS) for acute dyspnea when compared to usual care (no LUS).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Prospective, randomized study using a phased implementation on patients being transported by EMS to the hospital for acute dyspnea. The investigators will include adults (\>17yo) with a chief complaint of dyspnea and at least one of the following: bilateral lower extremity edema, orthopnea, wheezing or rales on auscultation, increased work of breathing, tachypnea (RR\>20) or hypoxia (oxygen saturation \<92%). Patients with fever (\>100.4F), systolic blood pressure \<90mmHg, those requiring immediate intubation, those found to have ST elevation myocardial infarction on EKG, or pregnant will be excluded. Eligible patients will be enrolled in the pre-hospital setting over a 12-month period. Randomization that will occur at the ambulance level using a stepped wedge cluster randomization trial design. Twenty-six full-time paramedics previously trained in LUS will perform a 2 or 4-view imaging protocol and interpret images in real-time to guide acute management. The diagnosis of AHF on LUS will be defined as bilateral B-lines (\>2 B-lines in a zone in each hemi-thorax). A hospital diagnosis of AHF versus not HF will be determined through independent chart review by two blinded physicians and will serve as the criterion standard for final diagnosis. Diagnosis by paramedics, whether LUS was used, and treatment given pre-hospital will be tracked in ESO (an online EMS clinical documentation system). For the primary aim the investigators will compare pre-hospital provider diagnosis to final diagnosis to determine accuracy with and without the use of LUS.

Expected Results: The investigators anticipate the use of prehospital LUS will improve diagnostic accuracy for detecting AHF. This pilot study will set the groundwork for future larger studies assessing the clinical impact of prehospital LUS.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Heart Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Usual Care

Group Type OTHER

Usual Care

Intervention Type OTHER

Usual care to decide diagnosis and treatment

Lung Ultrasound

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lung Ultrasound

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

LUS will be performed and interpreted in real-time to guide acute management.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lung Ultrasound

LUS will be performed and interpreted in real-time to guide acute management.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Usual Care

Usual care to decide diagnosis and treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients (\>17yo) with a chief complaint of shortness of breath.

Exclusion Criteria

* We will exclude patients with hypotension (SBP \<90), an EKG showing ST-segment elevation, fever \>100.4F, trauma or who are pregnant.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Indiana University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Frances Russell

Associate Professor Emergency Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Methodist Hospital

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

15954

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.