Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
56 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-03-01
2018-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The goal of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound to predict a cardiac origin of dyspnea in unselected patients in the emergency room as compared to standard evaluation. Further goals are to evaluate if lung ultrasound provides additional diagnostic information as compared to clinical examination, NT-proBNP and chest X-ray, to compare the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound in different patient subgroups (heart failure with preserved vs reduced ejection fraction, de novo vs decompensated chronic heart failure, age ≥75 vs \<75 years, women vs men and presence vs absence of concomitant pulmonary disease) and to compare demographics and clinical characteristics in different patient populations.
300 patients, aged ≥18 years presenting to the emergency room (ER) with acute dyspnoe as principal complaint will undergo initial clinical assessment of the likely etiology of dyspnea by the ER physician in charge. The second assessment by the same physician will include results of NT-proBNP according to predefined cutoffs. Final diagnosis ("Gold Standard") will be done by two experienced investigators after patient discharge taking into account the complete medical record except the results of lung ultrasound. Assessment of chest X-ray and lung ultrasound by investigators will be preforemd blinded regarding all other results.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Contribution and Reproducibility of Lung Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Acute Heart Failure in the ED
NCT03660592
Bedside Ultrasound Identifies Congestive Heart Failure
NCT00833144
Pre-Hospital Lung Ultrasound Impact on Diagnosis
NCT05461547
Bedside Lung Ultrasonography by Nurses in Acute Dyspnea.
NCT05126940
Contribution LUS in the Diagnosis of Acute Heart Failure (AHF) in Patients Admitted to the ED
NCT03717779
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Background and Rationale: Acute heart failure is a life threatening condition requiring rapid diagnosis and treatment. However, the differentiation between heart failure and other conditions presenting with acute dyspnea is notoriously difficult in the emergency room. Point-of-care lung ultrasound is a simple, rapid and noninvasive technique directly visualizing fluid content in the lung as evidence for acute heart failure. A number of publications showed the diagnostic utility of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of heart failure, but many open questions remain.
Objective(s): 1) To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound to predict a cardiac origin of dyspnea in unselected patients in the emergency room as compared to standard evaluation. 2) To evaluate if lung ultrasound provides additional diagnostic information as compared to clinical examination, NT-proBNP and chest X-ray. 3) To compare the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound in different patient subgroups (heart failure with preserved vs reduced ejection fraction, de novo vs decompensated chronic heart failure, age ≥75 vs \<75 years, women vs men and presence vs absence of concomitant pulmonary disease. 4) To compare demographics and clinical characteristics in different patient populations.
Inclusion criteria: Emergency room presentation with acute dyspnoe as principal complaint (either new or worsening in the last 48 hours), age ≥18 years.
Exclusion criteria: Immediately life threatening condition (cardiac arrest, ST-elevation myocardial infarction, shock, respiratory failure requiring intubation), no consent.
Measurements and Procedures: Initial clinical assessment of the likely etiology of dyspnea by the emergency room physician in charge. Second assessment by the same physician including results of NT-proBNP according to predefined cutoffs. Final diagnosis ("Gold Standard") considering the complete medical record except the results of lung ultrasound by 2 experienced investigators after patient discharge. Assessment of chest X-ray and lung ultrasound by investigators blinded regarding all other results.
Study Product/Intervention: Point-of-care lung ultrasound in the emergency room as only study specific intervention. Registration of "B-lines" in 4 defined zones on both sides and calculation of a validated score. Digital storing of results for offline analysis.
Comparator(s): Comparison of the accuracy of lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of acute heart failure as compared to clinical investigation, NT-proBNP and chest X-ray alone or in combination.
Number of Participants: 300 patients. Based on the literature and clinical expericence we estimate than at least 50% of the patients will have a diagnosis of heart failure. In this group around 50% of patients will have heart failure with preserved, the other 50% with reduced ejection fraction. Most patients will suffer from decompensation of chronic heart failure and will be older than 75 years. Around 1/3 of the patients will have an additional diagnosis of chronic lung disease.
Study Duration: 3 years.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lung ultrasound
Point-of-care ultrasound exam of both lungs in 4 predefined zones.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Prof. Dr. Jörg Leuppi
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Prof. Dr. Jörg Leuppi
Institutional Head
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Peter Rickenbacher, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cantonal Hospital Baselland
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cantonal Hospital Baselland
Bruderholz, Basel-Landschaft, Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BASEC 2015-00133
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.