WELL-being Improvement Following a SOphrology Intervention in Hospital Staff

NCT ID: NCT05425511

Last Updated: 2025-09-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-03-08

Study Completion Date

2028-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Work stress and psychosocial risks are a major public health problem. Health-care workers (HCW) are particularly at risk. Moreover, non-HCW staff of hospitals can also be at risk, with working environment described as the main risk factor. The University Hospital (CHU) of Clermont-Ferrand is one of the 3 CHUs in France with more than 10% absenteeism, and the first CHU for duration of sick leave. The political orientations favor an approach to improve the quality of life at work.

Sophrology is a psychocorporal method used as a therapeutic technique or experienced as a philosophy of life. It is an exclusively verbal and non-tactile method. It combines a set of techniques that will act both on the body and on the mind through breathing exercises, muscle relaxation and mental imagery (or visualization). It allows to find a state of well-being and to activate all physical and psychological potential in order to acquire a better knowledge of oneself. NLP is a set of communication and self-transformation techniques that focuses on reactions rather than the origins of behaviors. NLP associated with sophrology proposes above all to mobilize the resources of the unconscious.

Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) strategies are effective in the improvement in mental (anxiety and depression), physical, and social health, both in the general population, in individuals with social/psychological problems or in patients, both in hospital settings or outside hospital. Similary, sophrology also demonstrated some benefits on symptoms of patients. However, these approaches have never been provided in the workplace for the benefits of workers at risk of stress-related disorders.

This protocol may permit improvements of stress-related outcomes. Putative short-term benefits: This protocol may incidentally detect cardiac disorders. Any abnormality discovered will not be covered by promotor's insurance (our exploratory study cannot lead to such event) and will be supported by health insurance.

In general, the investigators aim to demonstrate the effectiveness of a workplace sophrology / NLP intervention for HCW at risk of stress-related disorders. Stress and well-being will be the target of the intervention, and will be measured both in a subjective (questionnaire) and objective (biomarkers).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Work stress and psychosocial risks are a major public health problem. Health-care workers (HCW) are particularly at risk. Moreover, non-HCW staff of hospitals can also be at risk, with working environment described as the main risk factor. The University Hospital (CHU) of Clermont-Ferrand is one of the 3 CHUs in France with more than 10% absenteeism, and the first CHU for duration of sick leave. The political orientations favor an approach to improve the quality of life at work.

Sophrology is a psychocorporal method used as a therapeutic technique or experienced as a philosophy of life. It is an exclusively verbal and non-tactile method. It combines a set of techniques that will act both on the body and on the mind through breathing exercises, muscle relaxation and mental imagery (or visualization). It allows to find a state of well-being and to activate all physical and psychological potential in order to acquire a better knowledge of oneself. NLP is a set of communication and self-transformation techniques that focuses on reactions rather than the origins of behaviors. NLP associated with sophrology proposes above all to mobilize the resources of the unconscious.

Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) strategies are effective in the improvement in mental (anxiety and depression), physical, and social health, both in the general population, in individuals with social/psychological problems or in patients, both in hospital settings or outside hospital. Similary, sophrology also demonstrated some benefits on symptoms of patients. However, these approaches have never been provided in the workplace for the benefits of workers at risk of stress-related disorders.

This project proposes to evaluate the effects of a NLP and sophrology intervention for HCW, at the workplace. The investigators aim to evaluate both subjective and objective measures of stress.

This protocol may permit improvements of stress-related outcomes. Putative short-term benefits: This protocol may incidentally detect cardiac disorders. Any abnormality discovered will not be covered by promotor's insurance (our exploratory study cannot lead to such event) and will be supported by health insurance.

In general, the investigators aim to demonstrate the effectiveness of a workplace sophrology / NLP intervention for HCW at risk of stress-related disorders. Stress and well-being will be the target of the intervention, and will be measured both in a subjective (questionnaire) and objective (biomarkers).

The main objective is to demonstrate an improved heart rate variability in the intervention group during the period between month 1 (M1) and M3 (sophrology sessions) of the intervention group in comparison with the same control period M1 to M3 of the "deferred intervention" group.

The secondary objectives are to study for the following comparisons ((i) within groups: comparisons between and M0 to M7 by randomization group and (ii) between groups: comparisons at M5 and then between M0 and M7):

* The effects of the intervention on mental, physical and social health.
* The long-term effects of the intervention.
* The relationships between the perception of work and mental, physical and social health.
* The factors of success of the intervention (personality and perception of work, attendance rate, quality of personal practice, etc.)
* The effects on other biomarkers of stress such as other measures of the activity of the autonomic nervous system, DHEAS, cortisol, etc.

The study will be proposed to workers of the University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand (CHU)) using the mailing list of the staff. Volunteers will send an email with their contact to the address [email protected]. A Clinical Research Assistant will contact them back and give them a first quick explanation of the study by phone, and will send them the information letter, so they can read it prior to the inclusion visit. Investigators will undergo the inclusion visits, either physically or by teleconsultation. Investigators will explain to each volunteer, in an exhaustive, clear and adapted manner, the research procedure, the potential benefit and the adverse effects taking into account their specificity (state of health, age, profession, habits and life projects, family environment, etc.) and will answer all questions. They can sign the consent form either during the consultation or later after a reflection period of 8 days. In this case or for teleconsultation, the two signed consent forms will be returned by post or internal mail to the investigator. The investigator will keep one form, and the second form with both signature (investigator and volunteer) will be given to the volunteer at the baseline measure. They will be informed of the possibility, once their consent has been given, to withdraw it at any time.

Statistical analysis will be performed using Stata software (v15, Stata-Corp, College Station, US). Categorical parameters will be described in terms of numbers and frequencies, whereas continuous variables will be expressed as mean and standard deviation or median and \[inter-quartile range\] according to statistical distribution. The normality will be studied using Shapiro-Wilk test. Graphic representations will be complete presentations of results.

Patients will be described and compared between groups at inclusion according to the following variables: compliance with eligibility criteria, epidemiological characteristics, clinical characteristics and characteristics of possible treatments. The baseline comparability of the two groups will be assessed on the main characteristics of the participants and potential factors associated with the primary outcome. A possible difference between the two groups on one of these characteristics will be determined according to clinical considerations and not solely statistical ones.

Intergroup comparisons will be systematically conducted (1) without adjustment and (2) by adjusting for factors whose distribution could be unbalanced between groups.

All statistical tests will be two-sided and p\<0.05 will be considered significant. Most of analyses of the secondary evaluation criteria will be exploratory. As discussed by Feise, the adjustment of the type I error will not be systematically proposed, but case by case in view of clinical considerations and not only statistical.

This study aims to demonstrate an improved heart rate variability in the intervention group, in comparison with the control group. According to previous data, it seems reasonable to estimate that effect-size, for the primary analysis between M1 and M3, will be around 0.5 for HRV parameters (e.g. log(lf/hf), rmssd, sdnn, pnn50). To highlight such clinically relevant difference, 85 participants per randomized group will be needed for a two-sided type I error at 5%, a statistical power at 90%. Finally, it is proposed to include 100 patients per group to consider lost to follow-up.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stress Related Disorder Sophrology Neurolinguistic Programming

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

We will recruit workers from hospitals who will be randomized in two groups:

* the intervention group will have a longitudinal follow-up of seven months in total (a control period of 1 month, then 6 to 8 sophrology sessions during two months, then a 4-month follow-up)
* the control group will have a differed intervention (longitudinal follow-up of seven months in total beginning by a control period without intervention of 3 months, then 6 to 8 sophrology sessions during two months, then a 2-month follow-up).
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

intervention group

The intervention group will have a longitudinal follow-up of seven months in total (a control period of 1 month, then 6 to 8 sophrology sessions during two months, then a 4-month follow-up).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

sophrology / neurolinguistic programming intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

2 sessions will be offered per week at 2 different time and will last 1 hour. They can take place in a seated or standing position, without physical contact. The sessions will consist of breathing exercises, visualization, dynamic relaxation and concentration exercises. The program is standardized:

1. Dialogue between the sophrologist and the participants. It is possible to specify the objective(s) of the session. The sophrologist can ask more specific questions to adapt the session.
2. Presentation of the conduct of the session (possible variations) and instructions promoting autonomy
3. Guided by the sophrologist, the goal is to help free yourself from tensions, to play down a situation that worries and finally to realize that we can deal with. Exercises are adapted to the difficulties encountered by the participants.
4. Time for free expression after the practice to promote the integration of the technique while giving elements to the sophrologist to guide the future sessions.

control group

The control group will have a differed intervention (longitudinal follow-up of seven months in total beginning by a control period without intervention of 3 months, then 6 to 8 sophrology sessions during two months, then a 2-month follow-up).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

sophrology / neurolinguistic programming intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

2 sessions will be offered per week at 2 different time and will last 1 hour. They can take place in a seated or standing position, without physical contact. The sessions will consist of breathing exercises, visualization, dynamic relaxation and concentration exercises. The program is standardized:

1. Dialogue between the sophrologist and the participants. It is possible to specify the objective(s) of the session. The sophrologist can ask more specific questions to adapt the session.
2. Presentation of the conduct of the session (possible variations) and instructions promoting autonomy
3. Guided by the sophrologist, the goal is to help free yourself from tensions, to play down a situation that worries and finally to realize that we can deal with. Exercises are adapted to the difficulties encountered by the participants.
4. Time for free expression after the practice to promote the integration of the technique while giving elements to the sophrologist to guide the future sessions.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

sophrology / neurolinguistic programming intervention

2 sessions will be offered per week at 2 different time and will last 1 hour. They can take place in a seated or standing position, without physical contact. The sessions will consist of breathing exercises, visualization, dynamic relaxation and concentration exercises. The program is standardized:

1. Dialogue between the sophrologist and the participants. It is possible to specify the objective(s) of the session. The sophrologist can ask more specific questions to adapt the session.
2. Presentation of the conduct of the session (possible variations) and instructions promoting autonomy
3. Guided by the sophrologist, the goal is to help free yourself from tensions, to play down a situation that worries and finally to realize that we can deal with. Exercises are adapted to the difficulties encountered by the participants.
4. Time for free expression after the practice to promote the integration of the technique while giving elements to the sophrologist to guide the future sessions.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* worker (HCW or NHCW) from a hospital,
* age between 18-65 years,
* with a stress greater than 50 on a visual analogue scale (VAS) of stress,
* person able to give an informed consent to participate in research and
* affiliated with a Social Security scheme

Exclusion Criteria

* Psychiatric, cardiovascular (heart failure, arrhythmia, etc.), hepatic (liver failure, etc.), renal (kidney failure, etc.), or endocrinological diseases (diabetes, etc.) judged by the investigator to be incompatible with the study because they may interfere with the measurements
* Non-affiliated to a health insurance
* Protected persons (minors, pregnant women, breastfeeding women, guardianship, curatorship, deprived of freedoms, safeguard of justice)
* Refusal to participate
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Clermont Auvergne (UCA)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, France

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Frédéric Dutheil

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU clermont-ferrand

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Lise Laclautre

Role: CONTACT

334.73.754.963

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Lise Laclautre

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dutheil F, Parreira LM, Pereira B, Baldet M, Marson F, Chabaud C, Blot M, Baker JS, Zak M, Vallet G, Magnon V, Clinchamps M, Altun S. SOphrology Intervention to Improve WELL-Being in Hospital Staff (SO-WELL): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 9;20(2):1185. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021185.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36673939 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2020-A03236-33

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

AOI 2020 DUTHEIL

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.