MISOBEST - Orally Misoprostol Solution (Cytotec®) Versus Orally Misoprostol as a Tablet (Angusta®) for Induction of Labor
NCT ID: NCT05424445
Last Updated: 2023-08-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
884 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-01-21
2023-05-21
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparative Bioavailability Study of Two Misoprostol Formulations
NCT02516631
A Trial of Oral Misoprostol for Labor Augmentation
NCT00906347
Efficacy and Safety of Titrated Oral Misoprostol Solution for Labor Induction at Term
NCT01070472
Misoprostol Labour Induction Study
NCT03489928
Vaginal Misodel® in Comparison With Orally Administrated Misoprostol (Cytotec®) at Induction of Labour
NCT02918110
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Spontaneous onset of labor is usually preferred, as it generally means lower risk of complications compared to IOL. If delivery needs to be induced in women with an unfavorable cervical status, an oral solution of misoprostol is a safe and inexpensive method that is easy to control and provides a high success rate of vaginal deliveries with a very low risk of hyper stimulation. Since the preparation of misoprostol (Cytotec®) has been used off-label with the solution being prepared locally at every unit, the profession has been looking for alternatives. Angusta® 25 ug tablets is the alternative that has been developed and approved but without being compared to the oral solution of misoprostol, the most commonly used method for IOL in Sweden. In addition, Angusta® is 43 times more expensive (1011 SEK compared to 23.60 SEK for Cytotec® for eight doses) considering "a typical induction" for primiparous women. Both methods are currently in use in clinical practice in Sweden.
A recent study conducted in Sweden 2020 shows that the Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the concentration in the blood of misoprostol after administration of 25 ug Cytotec® po compared to Angusta® 25ug po differs . The AUC is 32.9% higher with Cytotec® compared to Angusta®. The lower AUC for Angusta® may result in lower efficacy and time to delivery. However, this is unknown. The reason for this difference may be that a greater proportion of misoprostol is absorbed buccally and/or sublingually with use of misoprostol as a solution compared to when it is used as a tablet. Misoprostol has significantly different effect on uterine contractility depending on method of administration(1). Thus, using Angusta® may result in negative health economic outcomes due to higher price and in addition, a longer time spent in the delivery unit. No comparison of these two formulations has been performed in clinical practice.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cytotec®
IOL with misoprostol oral solution (Cytotec®) 25 ug every second hour, up to eight doses, or until painful contractions are obtained. Thereafter IOL will proceed according to clinical practice.
Misoprostol
Women presenting at the study site with an indication for IOL will receive written and oral information about the study. They will have the opportunity to ask questions. If the woman agrees to participate and is deemed eligible, she will sign informed consent. The Swedish national guidelines regarding the method of IOL will be followed. Women will have an abdominal palpation to exclude malpresentation, a CTG, and a digital cervical exam to establish bishop score (BS) prior to inclusion (as per clinical practice). Randomization will be performed by the attending physician, midwife or study coordinator. Randomization will be by opening numbered opaque sealed envelopes in sequential order containing the randomization code. There are no restrictions for use of other medications. All concomitant medication will be recorded in the CRF.
Angusta®
IOL with misoprostol oral tablets (Angusta®) 25 ug every second hour, up to eight doses, or until painful contractions are obtained. Thereafter IOL will proceed according to clinical practice.
Misoprostol
Women presenting at the study site with an indication for IOL will receive written and oral information about the study. They will have the opportunity to ask questions. If the woman agrees to participate and is deemed eligible, she will sign informed consent. The Swedish national guidelines regarding the method of IOL will be followed. Women will have an abdominal palpation to exclude malpresentation, a CTG, and a digital cervical exam to establish bishop score (BS) prior to inclusion (as per clinical practice). Randomization will be performed by the attending physician, midwife or study coordinator. Randomization will be by opening numbered opaque sealed envelopes in sequential order containing the randomization code. There are no restrictions for use of other medications. All concomitant medication will be recorded in the CRF.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Misoprostol
Women presenting at the study site with an indication for IOL will receive written and oral information about the study. They will have the opportunity to ask questions. If the woman agrees to participate and is deemed eligible, she will sign informed consent. The Swedish national guidelines regarding the method of IOL will be followed. Women will have an abdominal palpation to exclude malpresentation, a CTG, and a digital cervical exam to establish bishop score (BS) prior to inclusion (as per clinical practice). Randomization will be performed by the attending physician, midwife or study coordinator. Randomization will be by opening numbered opaque sealed envelopes in sequential order containing the randomization code. There are no restrictions for use of other medications. All concomitant medication will be recorded in the CRF.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Cephalic presentation
* ≥37-42+0 weeks of gestation
* Unfavorable cervix score BS \<6 in nulliparous women and \<5 in parous women
* All participating women in the studies will receive oral and written information and must give informed consent before participation
Exclusion Criteria
2. Previous hysterotomy (scar in the uterine myometrium)
3. Non-reassuring cardiotocography (CTG) on admission (the door-test, first 20 minutes of registration of CTG).
4. Hypersensitivity to the active substance
5. If active labor has started
6. When oxytocin infusion is already used
7. Placenta previa
8. Renal failure (GFR \<15 ml/min/1.73 m2).
9. Any condition or circumstance due to which the investigator considers it is not in the best interest of subject to participate in the study or the inclusion of a subject risks negatively impacting the scientific or ethical integrity of the clinical trial.
18 Years
45 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Karolinska Institutet
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tove Wallström
MD, PhD, senior consultant
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Södersjukhuset
Stockholm, , Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Stephansson O, Petersson K, Bjork C, Conner P, Wikstrom AK. The Swedish Pregnancy Register - for quality of care improvement and research. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Apr;97(4):466-476. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13266. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
Wennerholm UB, Saltvedt S, Wessberg A, Alkmark M, Bergh C, Wendel SB, Fadl H, Jonsson M, Ladfors L, Sengpiel V, Wesstrom J, Wennergren G, Wikstrom AK, Elden H, Stephansson O, Hagberg H. Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial. BMJ. 2019 Nov 20;367:l6131. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6131.
Tang J, Kapp N, Dragoman M, de Souza JP. WHO recommendations for misoprostol use for obstetric and gynecologic indications. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 May;121(2):186-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.12.009. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
Amini M, Reis M, Wide-Swensson D. A Relative Bioavailability Study of Two Misoprostol Formulations Following a Single Oral or Sublingual Administration. Front Pharmacol. 2020 Feb 12;11:50. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00050. eCollection 2020.
Svensk E, Bessfelt E, Brismar Wendel S, Kopp Kallner H, Wallstrom T. Misoprostol as Oral Solution or Oral Tablet for Induction of Labour (MISOBEST): A Randomised Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial. BJOG. 2025 Feb;132(3):288-296. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17986. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EudraCT 2020-000663-23
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.