MISOBEST - Orally Misoprostol Solution (Cytotec®) Versus Orally Misoprostol as a Tablet (Angusta®) for Induction of Labor

NCT ID: NCT05424445

Last Updated: 2023-08-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

884 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-01-21

Study Completion Date

2023-05-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study is to evaluate efficacy of the cervical ripening of misoprostol administration in oral tablet, Angusta® compared with the off-label solution of misoprostol (Cytotec®) for induction of labor (IOL). Since there is a large cost difference between the preparations (Angusta® is 43 times more expensive than Cytotec®) it is, from a socio-economic perspective, of great interest to evaluate if Angusta can be replaced by Cytotec.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In Sweden as in most other countries, the rate of induction of labor (IOL) has steadily increased, peaking at 27% of all deliveries in 2020. Due to recently published studies showing decreased perinatal mortality with IOL at 41 instead of 42 gestational weeks, national guidelines have changed to offering all pregnant women reaching 41 weeks IOL, which will increase induction rates and subsequent cost of IOL for medication further.

Spontaneous onset of labor is usually preferred, as it generally means lower risk of complications compared to IOL. If delivery needs to be induced in women with an unfavorable cervical status, an oral solution of misoprostol is a safe and inexpensive method that is easy to control and provides a high success rate of vaginal deliveries with a very low risk of hyper stimulation. Since the preparation of misoprostol (Cytotec®) has been used off-label with the solution being prepared locally at every unit, the profession has been looking for alternatives. Angusta® 25 ug tablets is the alternative that has been developed and approved but without being compared to the oral solution of misoprostol, the most commonly used method for IOL in Sweden. In addition, Angusta® is 43 times more expensive (1011 SEK compared to 23.60 SEK for Cytotec® for eight doses) considering "a typical induction" for primiparous women. Both methods are currently in use in clinical practice in Sweden.

A recent study conducted in Sweden 2020 shows that the Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the concentration in the blood of misoprostol after administration of 25 ug Cytotec® po compared to Angusta® 25ug po differs . The AUC is 32.9% higher with Cytotec® compared to Angusta®. The lower AUC for Angusta® may result in lower efficacy and time to delivery. However, this is unknown. The reason for this difference may be that a greater proportion of misoprostol is absorbed buccally and/or sublingually with use of misoprostol as a solution compared to when it is used as a tablet. Misoprostol has significantly different effect on uterine contractility depending on method of administration(1). Thus, using Angusta® may result in negative health economic outcomes due to higher price and in addition, a longer time spent in the delivery unit. No comparison of these two formulations has been performed in clinical practice.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Induced Vaginal Delivery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Due to the nature of the study, comparing the same drug but in different preparations, blinding is not deemed feasible.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cytotec®

IOL with misoprostol oral solution (Cytotec®) 25 ug every second hour, up to eight doses, or until painful contractions are obtained. Thereafter IOL will proceed according to clinical practice.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Misoprostol

Intervention Type DRUG

Women presenting at the study site with an indication for IOL will receive written and oral information about the study. They will have the opportunity to ask questions. If the woman agrees to participate and is deemed eligible, she will sign informed consent. The Swedish national guidelines regarding the method of IOL will be followed. Women will have an abdominal palpation to exclude malpresentation, a CTG, and a digital cervical exam to establish bishop score (BS) prior to inclusion (as per clinical practice). Randomization will be performed by the attending physician, midwife or study coordinator. Randomization will be by opening numbered opaque sealed envelopes in sequential order containing the randomization code. There are no restrictions for use of other medications. All concomitant medication will be recorded in the CRF.

Angusta®

IOL with misoprostol oral tablets (Angusta®) 25 ug every second hour, up to eight doses, or until painful contractions are obtained. Thereafter IOL will proceed according to clinical practice.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Misoprostol

Intervention Type DRUG

Women presenting at the study site with an indication for IOL will receive written and oral information about the study. They will have the opportunity to ask questions. If the woman agrees to participate and is deemed eligible, she will sign informed consent. The Swedish national guidelines regarding the method of IOL will be followed. Women will have an abdominal palpation to exclude malpresentation, a CTG, and a digital cervical exam to establish bishop score (BS) prior to inclusion (as per clinical practice). Randomization will be performed by the attending physician, midwife or study coordinator. Randomization will be by opening numbered opaque sealed envelopes in sequential order containing the randomization code. There are no restrictions for use of other medications. All concomitant medication will be recorded in the CRF.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Misoprostol

Women presenting at the study site with an indication for IOL will receive written and oral information about the study. They will have the opportunity to ask questions. If the woman agrees to participate and is deemed eligible, she will sign informed consent. The Swedish national guidelines regarding the method of IOL will be followed. Women will have an abdominal palpation to exclude malpresentation, a CTG, and a digital cervical exam to establish bishop score (BS) prior to inclusion (as per clinical practice). Randomization will be performed by the attending physician, midwife or study coordinator. Randomization will be by opening numbered opaque sealed envelopes in sequential order containing the randomization code. There are no restrictions for use of other medications. All concomitant medication will be recorded in the CRF.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Singleton gestations
* Cephalic presentation
* ≥37-42+0 weeks of gestation
* Unfavorable cervix score BS \<6 in nulliparous women and \<5 in parous women
* All participating women in the studies will receive oral and written information and must give informed consent before participation

Exclusion Criteria

1. Inability to understand the study information written in Swedish or English
2. Previous hysterotomy (scar in the uterine myometrium)
3. Non-reassuring cardiotocography (CTG) on admission (the door-test, first 20 minutes of registration of CTG).
4. Hypersensitivity to the active substance
5. If active labor has started
6. When oxytocin infusion is already used
7. Placenta previa
8. Renal failure (GFR \<15 ml/min/1.73 m2).
9. Any condition or circumstance due to which the investigator considers it is not in the best interest of subject to participate in the study or the inclusion of a subject risks negatively impacting the scientific or ethical integrity of the clinical trial.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Karolinska Institutet

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tove Wallström

MD, PhD, senior consultant

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Södersjukhuset

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Stephansson O, Petersson K, Bjork C, Conner P, Wikstrom AK. The Swedish Pregnancy Register - for quality of care improvement and research. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Apr;97(4):466-476. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13266. Epub 2017 Dec 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29172245 (View on PubMed)

Wennerholm UB, Saltvedt S, Wessberg A, Alkmark M, Bergh C, Wendel SB, Fadl H, Jonsson M, Ladfors L, Sengpiel V, Wesstrom J, Wennergren G, Wikstrom AK, Elden H, Stephansson O, Hagberg H. Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial. BMJ. 2019 Nov 20;367:l6131. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6131.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31748223 (View on PubMed)

Tang J, Kapp N, Dragoman M, de Souza JP. WHO recommendations for misoprostol use for obstetric and gynecologic indications. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 May;121(2):186-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.12.009. Epub 2013 Feb 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23433680 (View on PubMed)

Amini M, Reis M, Wide-Swensson D. A Relative Bioavailability Study of Two Misoprostol Formulations Following a Single Oral or Sublingual Administration. Front Pharmacol. 2020 Feb 12;11:50. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00050. eCollection 2020.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32116725 (View on PubMed)

Svensk E, Bessfelt E, Brismar Wendel S, Kopp Kallner H, Wallstrom T. Misoprostol as Oral Solution or Oral Tablet for Induction of Labour (MISOBEST): A Randomised Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial. BJOG. 2025 Feb;132(3):288-296. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17986. Epub 2024 Oct 23.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39440409 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EudraCT 2020-000663-23

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Misoprostol Dosing in BMI Greater Than 30
NCT05262738 COMPLETED PHASE4
Mifepristone vs Misoprostol
NCT06502158 RECRUITING PHASE1