Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
302 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-01-01
2023-04-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators will perform a multicenter randomized-controlled trial comparing labor induction in an outpatient versus inpatient setting, aiming to increase knowledge on outpatient induction of labor with oral misoprostol. The study is based on experiences and findings from a recently performed pilot trial and targets a large group of relatively healthy pregnant women where induction of labor is decided.
The investigators hypothesize that women induced in an outpatient setting will be more satisfied than women induced in an inpatient setting.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Oral Misoprostol for Outpatient Induction of Labor
NCT04596397
Vaginally Administered Versus Per Oral Misoprostol in Induction of Labour
NCT02539199
Efficacy and Safety of Titrated Oral Misoprostol Solution for Labor Induction at Term
NCT01070472
Induction of Labor by Oral Misoprostol Solution
NCT04891679
Misoprostol Labour Induction Study
NCT03489928
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The inpatient induction group will receive the following treatment:
Oral misoprostol 25ug every two hours and a cardiotocography for fetal monitoring every 4-6 hours until start of contractions, the next 48 hours while admitted to the maternity ward. The participating women will be transferred to the labor ward by start of contractions or need for closer fetal surveillance and/or analgesia.
The outpatient induction group will receive the following treatment:
These participating women receive the first oral misoprostol 25ug at the maternity unit. After two hours if the cardiotocograph is normal and there are no signs of contractions, these women go home. At home, the women will continue to take 25ug misoprostol every two hours until 22 pm or until the contractions begin. Maximum time spent at home is 48 hours and maximum number of tablets is 12 during this period (6 tablets each day). The women will also receive oral and written information regarding when to return to the maternity ward. Information sheets for the midwives and included women will be adapted from those used in the pilot study.
If the contractions are still absent after 48 hours or a maximum of 12 tablets (6 per day), all women (both inpatient and outpatient) are admitted to the maternity ward for further induction of labor. All women will receive equal standard of care including fetal surveillance after admittance to the hospital. Further follow up is in accordance with standard procedure of the maternity ward. Questions about fidelity to the proposed protocol across sites will be asked in the patient questionnaire.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Induction of labour with oral misoprostol, inpatient setting
These women receive all treatment in the maternity unit.
Inpatient setting
These women stay at the maternity unit
Induction of labour with oral misoprostol, outpatient setting
These women are observed 2 hours after they receive one dose of oral misoprostol before they leave the maternity unit.
Outpatient setting
These women leave the maternity unit
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Inpatient setting
These women stay at the maternity unit
Outpatient setting
These women leave the maternity unit
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age ≥ 18 years
* Understand and read Norwegian
* Distance to hospital less than 1 hour
* Normal ultrasound including:
* fetal movements
* amniotic fluid (deepest single vertical pocket) \> 2 cm
* estimated fetal weight ≥ -15% (≥ 10 percentile)
* Normal antenatal cardiotocography
* Women with stable hypertension and uncomplicated preeclampsia without indication for inpatient treatment can be included after individual assessment.
* Access to partner or contact person at home for transportation to hospital
Exclusion Criteria
* Uterine scar
* BMI ≥ 40
* Abnormal fetal Doppler (if examined); umbilical artery pulsatility index ≥ 95 percentile and/or cerebroplacental ratio \<1
* Fetal anomaly or chromosomic / genetic disorder
* Grand multipara (P≥4)
* Cognitive barriers
* Pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia requiring in-hospital treatment, insulin dependent diabetes or other conditions associated with risk of fetal hypoxia during labor
* Signs of infection or serious health problems
* Favorable cervix and / or previous obstetric history providing contraindications for induction with misoprostol
* Combined risk factors, individually evaluated by the attending obstetrician
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Haukeland University Hospital
OTHER
St. Olavs Hospital
OTHER
Nordlandssykehuset HF
OTHER
Ostfold Hospital Trust
OTHER
Sorlandet Hospital HF
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Janne Rossen, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sorlandet HF
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Haukeland University Hospital
Bergen, , Norway
Nordlandssykehuset HF
Bodø, , Norway
Østfold Hospital Trust
Fredrikstad, , Norway
Sorlandet Hospital Trust
Kristiansand, , Norway
St. Olavs Hospital
Trondheim, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
WHO recommendations: Induction of labour at or beyond term. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535795/
Alfirevic Z, Gyte GM, Nogueira Pileggi V, Plachcinski R, Osoti AO, Finucane EM. Home versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 27;8(8):CD007372. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007372.pub4.
Alfirevic Z, Aflaifel N, Weeks A. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 13;2014(6):CD001338. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001338.pub3.
McDonagh M, Skelly AC, Tilden E, Brodt ED, Dana T, Hart E, Kantner SN, Fu R, Hermesch AC. Outpatient Cervical Ripening: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun 1;137(6):1091-1101. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004382.
Helmig RB, Hvidman LE. An audit of oral administration of Angusta(R) (misoprostol) 25 microg for induction of labor in 976 consecutive women with a singleton pregnancy in a university hospital in Denmark. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Oct;99(10):1396-1402. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13876. Epub 2020 May 19.
Ten Eikelder ML, Oude Rengerink K, Jozwiak M, de Leeuw JW, de Graaf IM, van Pampus MG, Holswilder M, Oudijk MA, van Baaren GJ, Pernet PJ, Bax C, van Unnik GA, Martens G, Porath M, van Vliet H, Rijnders RJ, Feitsma AH, Roumen FJ, van Loon AJ, Versendaal H, Weinans MJ, Woiski M, van Beek E, Hermsen B, Mol BW, Bloemenkamp KW. Induction of labour at term with oral misoprostol versus a Foley catheter (PROBAAT-II): a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2016 Apr 16;387(10028):1619-28. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00084-2. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
Austad FE, Kessler J, Magnussen EB, Pripp AH, Rossen J. Outpatient Versus Inpatient Induction of Labour With Oral Misoprostol: A Multicentre Randomised-Controlled Trial. BJOG. 2025 Oct;132(11):1562-1573. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.18296. Epub 2025 Jul 24.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
261787/2021
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.