Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
264 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-12-01
2018-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Women with singleton live pregnancy at term without any complications who were admitted in labor room for induction of labor were enrolled.
Study involves allocation of selected women in two groups randomly and use of either titrated or static oral misoprostol dose regimen to induce labor. Possible benefits included rapid induction of labor with oral drug regimen which is easier to comply as compared to vaginal regimens. Women were at risk of all the complications associated with induction of labor like labor abnormalities, risk of cesarean section, non reassuring fetal status.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy and Safety of Titrated Oral Misoprostol Solution for Labor Induction at Term
NCT01070472
Oral Misoprostol for Outpatient Induction of Labor
NCT04596397
Oral Misoprostol Solution in Comparison to Vaginal Misoprostol in Induction of Labor
NCT03863392
Oral Misoprostol Solution in Labor Induction
NCT03927807
Comparison of Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Labour Induction at Term
NCT05957666
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Women after randomization were allocated into two groups. The first group (A) was induced with hourly titrated oral misoprostol regimen and the second group (B) received two hourly static oral misoprostol regimen. Once labor had started, vital signs were closely monitored every 2 hours; fetal heart rate (FHR) and uterine activity every 15 minutes during first stage of labor. Per vaginum examination was done 4-hourly or as indicated.
Primary and secondary outcome measures were noted and analyzed to compare safety and efficacy of titrated and oral misoprstol solution.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A (Titrated OMS)
Titrated oral misoprostol solution
Oral misoprostol solution (OMS)
Based on the WHO labor induction recommendation, and for the purpose of achieving precise oral misoprostol dosage, one misoprostol tablet (200 mcg) was pulverized and dissolved into 200 ml water.90 Thus 1ml of solution had 1mcg of misoprostol. This misoprostol solution could be preserved at room temperature and remained active for 24 hours.
Hourly titrated oral misoprostol solution was given to group A as described by Wang X et al, 2016 as described below.
0 hour= 20ml
1. hour= 20ml
2. hour= 30ml
3. hour= 30ml
4. hour= 30ml
5. hour= 40ml 6.5 hour= 50ml 8.5 hour= 60ml 10.5 hour=60ml
Group B received 25 mcg (25 ml) oral misoprostol solution every 2 hours for a maximum of 12 doses or until the onset of regular uterine activity.
Group B (Static OMS)
Static oral misoprostol solution
Oral misoprostol solution (OMS)
Based on the WHO labor induction recommendation, and for the purpose of achieving precise oral misoprostol dosage, one misoprostol tablet (200 mcg) was pulverized and dissolved into 200 ml water.90 Thus 1ml of solution had 1mcg of misoprostol. This misoprostol solution could be preserved at room temperature and remained active for 24 hours.
Hourly titrated oral misoprostol solution was given to group A as described by Wang X et al, 2016 as described below.
0 hour= 20ml
1. hour= 20ml
2. hour= 30ml
3. hour= 30ml
4. hour= 30ml
5. hour= 40ml 6.5 hour= 50ml 8.5 hour= 60ml 10.5 hour=60ml
Group B received 25 mcg (25 ml) oral misoprostol solution every 2 hours for a maximum of 12 doses or until the onset of regular uterine activity.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Oral misoprostol solution (OMS)
Based on the WHO labor induction recommendation, and for the purpose of achieving precise oral misoprostol dosage, one misoprostol tablet (200 mcg) was pulverized and dissolved into 200 ml water.90 Thus 1ml of solution had 1mcg of misoprostol. This misoprostol solution could be preserved at room temperature and remained active for 24 hours.
Hourly titrated oral misoprostol solution was given to group A as described by Wang X et al, 2016 as described below.
0 hour= 20ml
1. hour= 20ml
2. hour= 30ml
3. hour= 30ml
4. hour= 30ml
5. hour= 40ml 6.5 hour= 50ml 8.5 hour= 60ml 10.5 hour=60ml
Group B received 25 mcg (25 ml) oral misoprostol solution every 2 hours for a maximum of 12 doses or until the onset of regular uterine activity.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. ≥37 weeks gestation;
3. Cephalic presentation;
4. Reassuring fetal heart rate;
5. Modified Bishop'score
Exclusion Criteria
2. Uterine scar due to previous cesarean section or other uterine surgery;
3. Grand multipara;
4. Multiple gestations;
5. High risk pregnanacies • preeeclampsia with severe features • significant maternal cardiac,renal, liver disease
6. Any contraindication to induction and vaginal delivery e.g. cephalopelvic disproportion, malpresentation, fetal compromise and ante partum hemorrhage
7. Intrauterine fetal demise
18 Years
40 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Barbie Sharma
Senior Resident, Department of obstetrics and gynecology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
SUNITA GOYAL, MBBS, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Department of obstetrics and gynecology, Christian Medical College and hospital, Ludhiana
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Christian Medical College and Hospital
Ludhiana, Punjab, India
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rouzi AA, Alsahly N, Alamoudi R, Almansouri N, Alsinani N, Alkafy S, Rozzah R, Abduljabbar H. Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated and 2 hourly static oral misoprostol solution for induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;216(4):405.e1-405.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.1054. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
Aduloju OP, Ipinnimo OM, Aduloju T. Oral misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial of hourly titrated and 2 hourly static oral misoprostol solution. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Feb;34(4):493-499. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1610378. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
Study Documents
Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
View DocumentDocument Type: Study Protocol
View DocumentOther Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Titrated and Static OMS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.