Induction of Labor by Oral Misoprostol Solution

NCT ID: NCT04891679

Last Updated: 2021-05-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

264 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-12-01

Study Completion Date

2018-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

AIM: To evaluate effectiveness and safety of titrated oral misoprostol solution (OMS) in comparison with static-dose oral misoprostol solution for induction of labor at term.

Women with singleton live pregnancy at term without any complications who were admitted in labor room for induction of labor were enrolled.

Study involves allocation of selected women in two groups randomly and use of either titrated or static oral misoprostol dose regimen to induce labor. Possible benefits included rapid induction of labor with oral drug regimen which is easier to comply as compared to vaginal regimens. Women were at risk of all the complications associated with induction of labor like labor abnormalities, risk of cesarean section, non reassuring fetal status.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This comparative randomized study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Christian medical college and hospital, Ludhiana for a period of one year beginning from 1st December, 2017 to 30th November, 2018. The study group comprised of all antenatal women admitted in labor room at term for induction of labor. Informed consent was taken for all selected women. Women were subjected to detailed history taking, a complete physical examination including per vaginum examination (to calculate modified bishop's score and to rule out cephalopelvic disproportion), investigations and a NST. Gestational age was established by the first date of the last menstrual period and confirmed by first trimester ultrasound. Presentation was confirmed by palpation and third trimester ultrasound.

Women after randomization were allocated into two groups. The first group (A) was induced with hourly titrated oral misoprostol regimen and the second group (B) received two hourly static oral misoprostol regimen. Once labor had started, vital signs were closely monitored every 2 hours; fetal heart rate (FHR) and uterine activity every 15 minutes during first stage of labor. Per vaginum examination was done 4-hourly or as indicated.

Primary and secondary outcome measures were noted and analyzed to compare safety and efficacy of titrated and oral misoprstol solution.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Induction of Labor

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Single center interventional single-blinded randomised controlled trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Women were randomized (1:1) into the treatment groups A) Titrated-dose OMS group B) Static dose OMS group; using computer generated number sequence. Allocation concealment was carried out by using opaque envelopes that were distributed by the obstetrics nurse. Whereas study investigators and attending care teams were aware of the allocated arm, patients were kept blinded to the allocation. Study investigators and outcome assessors could not be blinded as the data collection and analysis included outcome measures like timing of oral misoprostol solution doses.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A (Titrated OMS)

Titrated oral misoprostol solution

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Oral misoprostol solution (OMS)

Intervention Type DRUG

Based on the WHO labor induction recommendation, and for the purpose of achieving precise oral misoprostol dosage, one misoprostol tablet (200 mcg) was pulverized and dissolved into 200 ml water.90 Thus 1ml of solution had 1mcg of misoprostol. This misoprostol solution could be preserved at room temperature and remained active for 24 hours.

Hourly titrated oral misoprostol solution was given to group A as described by Wang X et al, 2016 as described below.

0 hour= 20ml

1. hour= 20ml
2. hour= 30ml
3. hour= 30ml
4. hour= 30ml
5. hour= 40ml 6.5 hour= 50ml 8.5 hour= 60ml 10.5 hour=60ml

Group B received 25 mcg (25 ml) oral misoprostol solution every 2 hours for a maximum of 12 doses or until the onset of regular uterine activity.

Group B (Static OMS)

Static oral misoprostol solution

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Oral misoprostol solution (OMS)

Intervention Type DRUG

Based on the WHO labor induction recommendation, and for the purpose of achieving precise oral misoprostol dosage, one misoprostol tablet (200 mcg) was pulverized and dissolved into 200 ml water.90 Thus 1ml of solution had 1mcg of misoprostol. This misoprostol solution could be preserved at room temperature and remained active for 24 hours.

Hourly titrated oral misoprostol solution was given to group A as described by Wang X et al, 2016 as described below.

0 hour= 20ml

1. hour= 20ml
2. hour= 30ml
3. hour= 30ml
4. hour= 30ml
5. hour= 40ml 6.5 hour= 50ml 8.5 hour= 60ml 10.5 hour=60ml

Group B received 25 mcg (25 ml) oral misoprostol solution every 2 hours for a maximum of 12 doses or until the onset of regular uterine activity.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Oral misoprostol solution (OMS)

Based on the WHO labor induction recommendation, and for the purpose of achieving precise oral misoprostol dosage, one misoprostol tablet (200 mcg) was pulverized and dissolved into 200 ml water.90 Thus 1ml of solution had 1mcg of misoprostol. This misoprostol solution could be preserved at room temperature and remained active for 24 hours.

Hourly titrated oral misoprostol solution was given to group A as described by Wang X et al, 2016 as described below.

0 hour= 20ml

1. hour= 20ml
2. hour= 30ml
3. hour= 30ml
4. hour= 30ml
5. hour= 40ml 6.5 hour= 50ml 8.5 hour= 60ml 10.5 hour=60ml

Group B received 25 mcg (25 ml) oral misoprostol solution every 2 hours for a maximum of 12 doses or until the onset of regular uterine activity.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Singleton live pregnancy;
2. ≥37 weeks gestation;
3. Cephalic presentation;
4. Reassuring fetal heart rate;
5. Modified Bishop'score

Exclusion Criteria

1. Hypersensitivity to misoprostol;
2. Uterine scar due to previous cesarean section or other uterine surgery;
3. Grand multipara;
4. Multiple gestations;
5. High risk pregnanacies • preeeclampsia with severe features • significant maternal cardiac,renal, liver disease
6. Any contraindication to induction and vaginal delivery e.g. cephalopelvic disproportion, malpresentation, fetal compromise and ante partum hemorrhage
7. Intrauterine fetal demise
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Barbie Sharma

Senior Resident, Department of obstetrics and gynecology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

SUNITA GOYAL, MBBS, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Department of obstetrics and gynecology, Christian Medical College and hospital, Ludhiana

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Christian Medical College and Hospital

Ludhiana, Punjab, India

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

India

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rouzi AA, Alsahly N, Alamoudi R, Almansouri N, Alsinani N, Alkafy S, Rozzah R, Abduljabbar H. Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated and 2 hourly static oral misoprostol solution for induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;216(4):405.e1-405.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.1054. Epub 2016 Dec 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27986461 (View on PubMed)

Aduloju OP, Ipinnimo OM, Aduloju T. Oral misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial of hourly titrated and 2 hourly static oral misoprostol solution. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Feb;34(4):493-499. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1610378. Epub 2019 Apr 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31006282 (View on PubMed)

Study Documents

Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Titrated and Static OMS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Misoprostol Labour Induction Study
NCT03489928 COMPLETED PHASE3