Low-dose Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Dinoprostone Insert for Induction of Labor
NCT ID: NCT03744364
Last Updated: 2018-11-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
198 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-06-01
2017-11-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose protocol of vaginal misoprostol and vaginal dinoprostone insert for induction of labor in women with post-term pregnancies.
Methods:
The investigators designed a prospective, randomized, open-labeled, blinded for the end-point evaluators trial including women of at least 41 weeks of gestational age with uncomplicated singleton pregnancies and Bishop score lower than 6. Participants were randomized into dinoprostone or misoprostol groups in a 1:1 ratio. Baseline maternal data and perinatal outcomes were recorded for statistical analysis. Successful vaginal delivery within 24 hours was the primary outcome variable.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Misoprostol Labour Induction Study
NCT03489928
Safety and Efficacy Study of Misoprostol Vaginal Insert for Induction of Labour
NCT00346840
Efficacy and Safety of Hourly Titrated Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Dinoprostone and Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction
NCT02902653
Efficacy and Safety of Oral Misoprostol 25 μg vs. Vaginal Dinoprostone in Induction of Labor at Term
NCT04955847
Titrated Oral Misoprostol Compared to Vaginal Dinoprostone for Induction of Labor
NCT02036437
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Misoprostol
Group of women allocated to misoprostol induction.
Misoprostol 25 mcg
To determine efficacy and safety of vaginal 'Misoprostol 25 mcg' every 4 hours with a maximum of 6 doses for induction of labor.
Dinoprostone
Group of women allocated to dinoprostone induction.
Dinoprostone 10mg
To determine efficacy and safety of 'Dinoprostone 10mg' vaginal insert for induction of labor.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Misoprostol 25 mcg
To determine efficacy and safety of vaginal 'Misoprostol 25 mcg' every 4 hours with a maximum of 6 doses for induction of labor.
Dinoprostone 10mg
To determine efficacy and safety of 'Dinoprostone 10mg' vaginal insert for induction of labor.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Nulliparity
* Live fetus
* 286 days of gestational age or above
* Abscence of contraindication for vaginal delivery
* Bishop score lower than 6
Exclusion Criteria
* Multiparity
* Stillbirth
* Oligohydramnios
* Suspected fetal distress
* Severe asthma
* Intolerance/allergy to prostaglandins
* Contraindication for vaginal birth
18 Years
50 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital Miguel Servet
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jose Manuel Campillos Maza
Head of Unit of Maternal-Fetal Medicine
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
De Bonrostro Torralba C, Tejero Cabrejas EL, Envid Lazaro BM, Franco Royo MJ, Roca Arquillue M, Campillos Maza JM. Low-dose vaginal misoprostol vs vaginal dinoprostone insert for induction of labor beyond 41st week: A randomized trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Jul;98(7):913-919. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13556. Epub 2019 Feb 24.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
JMC-PGE-2014-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.