Efficacy & Safety Study Comparing Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) Versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert (DVI) for Reducing Time to Vaginal Delivery

NCT ID: NCT01127581

Last Updated: 2014-05-01

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1358 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-09-30

Study Completion Date

2012-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) 200 microgram (mcg) can decrease the time to vaginal delivery compared to the Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert (DVI) 10 milligram (mg) in pregnant women requiring cervical ripening and induction of labor.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Reducing Time to Vaginal Delivery Cervical Ripening Induction of Labor

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MVI 200

MVI 200 mcg vaginal insert

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

MVI 200

Intervention Type DRUG

Dose reservoir of 200 mcg of misoprostol in a hydrogel polymer vaginal insert within a retrieval system. The MVI 200 will be kept in place for up to 24 hours or will be removed earlier if one of the following occur: onset of active labor, intrapartum adverse event necessitating discontinuation of the study drug, other reasons including maternal request.

Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert (DVI)

10 mg Dinoprostone vaginal insert

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert (DVI)

Intervention Type DRUG

Dose reservoir of 10 mg of dinoprostone in a hydrogel polymer vaginal insert within a retrieval system. The DVI will be kept in place for up to 24 hours or will be removed earlier if one of the following occur: onset of active labor, intrapartum adverse event necessitating discontinuation of the study drug, other reasons including maternal request.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

MVI 200

Dose reservoir of 200 mcg of misoprostol in a hydrogel polymer vaginal insert within a retrieval system. The MVI 200 will be kept in place for up to 24 hours or will be removed earlier if one of the following occur: onset of active labor, intrapartum adverse event necessitating discontinuation of the study drug, other reasons including maternal request.

Intervention Type DRUG

Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert (DVI)

Dose reservoir of 10 mg of dinoprostone in a hydrogel polymer vaginal insert within a retrieval system. The DVI will be kept in place for up to 24 hours or will be removed earlier if one of the following occur: onset of active labor, intrapartum adverse event necessitating discontinuation of the study drug, other reasons including maternal request.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Misopess(TM) Misodel (R) Cervidil (R) Propess (R)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Provide written informed consent;
* Pregnant women at ≥ 36 weeks 0 days inclusive gestation;
* Women aged 18 years or older;
* Candidate for pharmacological induction of labor;
* Single, live vertex fetus;
* Baseline modified Bishop score ≤ 4;
* Parity ≤ 3 (parity is defined as one or more births live or dead after 24 weeks gestation);
* Body Mass Index (BMI) ≤ 50 at the time of entry to the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Women in active labor;
* Presence of uterine or cervical scar or uterine abnormality e.g., bicornate uterus. Biopsies, including cone biopsy of the cervix, are permitted;
* Administration of oxytocin or any cervical ripening or labor inducing agents (including mechanical methods) or a tocolytic drug within 7 days prior to enrollment. Magnesium sulfate is permitted if prescribed as treatment for pre-eclampsia or gestational hypertension;
* Severe pre-eclampsia marked by Hemolytic anemia, Elevated Liver enzymes, Low Platelet count (HELLP) syndrome, other end-organ affliction or Central Nervous System (CNS) findings other than mild headache;
* Fetal malpresentation;
* Diagnosed congenital anomalies, not including polydactyly;
* Any evidence of fetal compromise at baseline (e.g., non-reassuring fetal heart rate pattern or meconium staining);
* Amnioinfusion or other treatment of non-reassuring fetal status at any time prior to the induction attempt;
* Ruptured membranes ≥ 48 hours prior to the start of treatment;
* Suspected chorioamnionitis;
* Fever (oral or aural temperature \> 37.5°C);
* Any condition in which vaginal delivery is contraindicated e.g., placenta previa or any unexplained genital bleeding at any time after 24 weeks during this pregnancy;
* Known or suspected allergy to misoprostol, dinoprostone, other prostaglandins or any of the excipients;
* Any condition urgently requiring delivery;
* Unable to comply with the protocol.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ferring Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clinical Development Support

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Ferring Pharmaceuticals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Maricopa Medical Center - District Medical Group

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Precision Trials

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix Perinatal Associates (Scottsdale Healthcare Shea)

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Watching Over Mothers and Babies Foundation

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Miller's Childrens Hospital

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

UCI Medical Center

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

The Women's Clinic of Northern Colorado

Fort Collins, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Christiana Care Health System (DE Center for MFM)

Newark, Delaware, United States

Site Status

University of FL College of Medicine

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Altus Research

Lake Worth, Florida, United States

Site Status

University of South Florida

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Indiana University School of Medicine

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

University of Kansas School of Medicine

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

University of Michigan Hospital

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Spectrum Health

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

Site Status

St. Louis University

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St. Peters University Hospital

New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

University of New Mexico/New Mexico Health Science Center

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

East Carolina University, Brody School of Medicine

Greenville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Lyndhurst Gynecologic Associates

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

University of Cincinnati

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trials of America

Eugene, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Drexel University College of Medicine

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Temple University School of Medicine

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Thomas Jefferson University

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

University Medical Group/Greenville Hospital System

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

UT College of Medicine Chattanooga, Erlanger Health System

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

High Risk Obstetrical Consultants, PLLC

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Research Memphis Associates

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake Women's Center, PC

Sandy City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation

Marshfield, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Miller H, Goetzl L, Wing DA, Powers B, Rugarn O. Optimising daytime deliveries when inducing labour using prostaglandin vaginal inserts. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(4):517-22. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1011117. Epub 2015 Mar 16.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25758619 (View on PubMed)

Wing DA, Brown R, Plante LA, Miller H, Rugarn O, Powers BL. Misoprostol vaginal insert and time to vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Aug;122(2 Pt 1):201-209. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31829a2dd6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23857539 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Miso-Obs-303

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Misoprostol Labour Induction Study
NCT03489928 COMPLETED PHASE3
Misoprostol for Non-Viable Pregnancies
NCT00426491 COMPLETED PHASE3
Mifepristone vs Misoprostol
NCT06502158 RECRUITING PHASE1