Comparison Between Vaginal and Sublingual Misoprostol 50 µg for Cervical Ripening Prior to Induction of Labor
NCT ID: NCT02732522
Last Updated: 2016-04-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
102 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-10-31
2016-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety and Efficacy Study of Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
NCT01428037
Sublingual Misoprostol for Induction of Labor
NCT01406392
Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labor
NCT00148473
Safety and Efficacy Study of Misoprostol Vaginal Insert for Induction of Labour
NCT00346840
To Study the Efficacy and Safety of Misoprostol by Sublingual Routes for Induction of Labour
NCT04887493
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Tachysystole was defined as the presence of at least 6 uterine contractions in 10 minutes.
Primary result was defined as the clinically significant variation (of at least 2 points) of the Bishop score at 6 hours after administration of 50 µg misoprostol. Secondary results were defined as the presence of tachysystole, frequency of vaginal birth and cesarean section, frequency in which new doses were needed to continue with induction of labor and frequency with which labor was diagnosed at 6 hours of administration of misoprostol. Neonatal results included Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes and pH value in umbilical cord gasometry. Final analysis was made according to intention to treat.
In order to detect a difference in the mean of Bishop score of 2 points, using a standard deviation of 2, with a 90% power, reaching a confidence interval of 95%, a population of 49 patients was required for each group.
Randomization was done in permuted blocks of 2, using a table of randomized numbers. Group 1 included those patients who received sublingual misoprostol and group 2 those patients who received vaginal misoprostol. Analysis was done in statistical package SPSS (reg) V16. For continuous variables a mean and standard deviation were described; for categorical variables absolute frequency and percentage were described. For statistical analysis a 2-tiled independent t-test was used, in order to compare the mean of the two groups. Also, chi-squared test and Fisher´s exact test were used to compare proportions among the two groups where it corresponds.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Misoprostol sublingual
Sublingual misoprostol
Misoprostol vaginal
Vaginal misoprostol
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sublingual misoprostol
Vaginal misoprostol
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Gestational ages between 32/0 and 41/6 according to first trimester sonogram
* A viable fetus in cephalic presentation
* Estimated fetal weight lower than 4000 gr
* Without contraindications for vaginal birth
* Whom induction of labor with misoprostol had been previously indicated, from 8 to 20 hours 7 days a week.
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universidad de la Republica
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Andrés Conde
M.D.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Conde A, Ben S, Tarigo J, Artucio S, Varela V, Grimaldi P, Sosa C, Alonso J. Comparison between vaginal and sublingual misoprostol 50 microg for cervical ripening prior to induction of labor: randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Apr;295(4):839-844. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4297-9. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CMVS-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.