Comparison Between Vaginal and Sublingual Misoprostol 50 µg for Cervical Ripening Prior to Induction of Labor

NCT ID: NCT02732522

Last Updated: 2016-04-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

102 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-10-31

Study Completion Date

2016-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To analyze whether there is a statistically significant difference in the modifications present in the uterine cervix 6 hours after administration of misoprostol 50 µg through vaginal versus sublingual routes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A randomized, single blind clinical trial, was performed. Inclusion criteria were all pregnant women admitted at Pereira Rossell Hospital Center with gestational ages between 32/0 and 41/6 according to first trimester sonogram, with a viable fetus in cephalic presentation, with estimated fetal weight lower than 4000 gr, without contraindications for vaginal birth, to whom induction of labor with misoprostol had been previously indicated, from 8 to 20 hours 7 days a week. Protocol counted with approval of the Ethics Commission of the Pereira Rossell Hospital. All participants gave written informed consent before the study began. Once there was confirmation that the patient met the inclusion criteria, information was given and consent form was signed, the patient entered the study and the intervention was randomized. Randomization was computer generated in permuted blocks of 2 by an epidemiologist from our Service, and the result was in a sealed and opaque envelope which was opened at the time of administering the medication. Prior to administration of the medication, an Obstetrician or Obstetrics resident who was not familiar with the administration route assigned to the patient assessed through vaginal examination the characteristics of the cervix in terms of Bishop score. Afterwards, a technician from the investigation team administered the misoprostol according to the assigned route (50 µg misoprostol vaginal or sublingual).

Tachysystole was defined as the presence of at least 6 uterine contractions in 10 minutes.

Primary result was defined as the clinically significant variation (of at least 2 points) of the Bishop score at 6 hours after administration of 50 µg misoprostol. Secondary results were defined as the presence of tachysystole, frequency of vaginal birth and cesarean section, frequency in which new doses were needed to continue with induction of labor and frequency with which labor was diagnosed at 6 hours of administration of misoprostol. Neonatal results included Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes and pH value in umbilical cord gasometry. Final analysis was made according to intention to treat.

In order to detect a difference in the mean of Bishop score of 2 points, using a standard deviation of 2, with a 90% power, reaching a confidence interval of 95%, a population of 49 patients was required for each group.

Randomization was done in permuted blocks of 2, using a table of randomized numbers. Group 1 included those patients who received sublingual misoprostol and group 2 those patients who received vaginal misoprostol. Analysis was done in statistical package SPSS (reg) V16. For continuous variables a mean and standard deviation were described; for categorical variables absolute frequency and percentage were described. For statistical analysis a 2-tiled independent t-test was used, in order to compare the mean of the two groups. Also, chi-squared test and Fisher´s exact test were used to compare proportions among the two groups where it corresponds.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cervical Ripening

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Misoprostol sublingual

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sublingual misoprostol

Intervention Type DRUG

Misoprostol vaginal

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Vaginal misoprostol

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sublingual misoprostol

Intervention Type DRUG

Vaginal misoprostol

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All pregnant women admitted at Pereira Rossell Hospital Center
* Gestational ages between 32/0 and 41/6 according to first trimester sonogram
* A viable fetus in cephalic presentation
* Estimated fetal weight lower than 4000 gr
* Without contraindications for vaginal birth
* Whom induction of labor with misoprostol had been previously indicated, from 8 to 20 hours 7 days a week.
Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidad de la Republica

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Andrés Conde

M.D.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Conde A, Ben S, Tarigo J, Artucio S, Varela V, Grimaldi P, Sosa C, Alonso J. Comparison between vaginal and sublingual misoprostol 50 microg for cervical ripening prior to induction of labor: randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Apr;295(4):839-844. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4297-9. Epub 2017 Feb 16.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28204882 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CMVS-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Misoprostol Dosing in BMI Greater Than 30
NCT05262738 COMPLETED PHASE4
Mifepristone vs Misoprostol
NCT06502158 RECRUITING PHASE1