Dry vs Wet Misoprostol for Cervical Dilation in First Trimester Abortion

NCT ID: NCT02522078

Last Updated: 2016-03-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

46 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-08-31

Study Completion Date

2016-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to verify whether the moisture of 400 µg of misoprostol pre uterine evacuation increases the dilatation of uterine cervix compared to dry misoprostol

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Misoprostol is the most widely used drug for abortion due to its low cost, stability and easy to use regimen. Nevertheless, there is a debate whether the administration of dry misoprostol has similar effects compared to wet pill. It would be necessary to undertake a clinical trial to evaluate which regimen (dry or wet) offers a better cervical dilation pre uterine evacuation. The primary objective of this study is to compare the degree of cervical dilatation pre-uterine evacuation in subject that received 400 µg of dry or wet misoprostol 3 or more hours before the procedure. Secondary objective is to verify whether there is a correlation between vaginal pH (\<5 / ≥5) and the degree of cervical dilation (≥8mm / \<8mm) with the use of wet or dry misoprostol. Women will be randomized to one of the two groups: dry or wet misoprostol.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Abortion Early

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Dry Misoprostol

400 µg of dry misoprostol

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

dry misoprostol

Intervention Type DRUG

400 µg of dry misoprostol will be introduced into the vaginal fornices 3 or more hours before uterine evacuation

Wet misoprostol

400 µg of wet misoprostol

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

wet misoprostol

Intervention Type DRUG

400 µg of wet misoprostol will be introduced into the vaginal fornices 3 or more hours before uterine evacuation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

dry misoprostol

400 µg of dry misoprostol will be introduced into the vaginal fornices 3 or more hours before uterine evacuation

Intervention Type DRUG

wet misoprostol

400 µg of wet misoprostol will be introduced into the vaginal fornices 3 or more hours before uterine evacuation

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women with abortion (less than 12 weeks of pregnancy)

Exclusion Criteria

* congestive heart failure
* chronic pulmonary disease
* hypovolemic shock
* twins
* Marfan syndrome
* septic abortion (fever, pus , leukocytosis \>14,000)
* known allergies to misoprostol
* blood dyscrasia
* open cervical (≥ 1cm)
* use of intrauterine device
Minimum Eligible Age

14 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ricardo F Savaris, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

WHO. The Prevention and management of unsafe abortion: report of a technical working group, Geneva, 12-15 April 1992. 1993

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Regan L, Rai R. Epidemiology and the medical causes of miscarriage. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2000 Oct;14(5):839-54. doi: 10.1053/beog.2000.0123.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11023804 (View on PubMed)

Grimes DA, Benson J, Singh S, Romero M, Ganatra B, Okonofua FE, Shah IH. Unsafe abortion: the preventable pandemic. Lancet. 2006 Nov 25;368(9550):1908-19. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69481-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17126724 (View on PubMed)

Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gulmezoglu AM, Van Look PF. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet. 2006 Apr 1;367(9516):1066-1074. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68397-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16581405 (View on PubMed)

Neilson JP, Gyte GM, Hickey M, Vazquez JC, Dou L. Medical treatments for incomplete miscarriage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;(3):CD007223. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007223.pub3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23543549 (View on PubMed)

Fong YF, Singh K, Prasad RN. A comparative study using two dose regimens (200 microg or 400 microg) of vaginal misoprostol for pre-operative cervical dilatation in first trimester nulliparae. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Apr;105(4):413-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10126.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9609268 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

15-0115

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Mifepristone vs Misoprostol
NCT06502158 RECRUITING PHASE1
Misoprostol in Missed Abortion
NCT06818903 NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Misoprostol for Non-Viable Pregnancies
NCT00426491 COMPLETED PHASE3