Emotion Regulation Strategies in Toddlerhood and Middle Childhood

NCT ID: NCT05415319

Last Updated: 2023-11-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-08-31

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will examine the relation between behavioral emotion regulation (ER) strategies at toddler age 3 to cognitive ER strategies in middle childhood/pre-adolescence as part of an ongoing longitudinal study of children's typical development. Aim 1 is to test whether self-soothing/caregiver-focused and distraction behavioral ER strategies at child age 3 predict avoidant and engaging cognitive ER strategies, respectively, at a follow-up assessment to be completed when children are 8-14 years old. In a completed wave of data collection, children's ER behaviors were elicited in laboratory tasks characterized by novelty and uncertainty at age 3. Avoidant and engaged cognitive ER strategies will be assessed by children's self-report, parent-report, and interviews with children after they engage in new laboratory tasks characterized by uncertainty. Hypothesis 1a: Self-soothing/caregiver-focused toddler behavioral ER strategies will predict avoidant cognitive strategies in middle childhood/pre-adolescence. Hypothesis 1b: The toddler behavioral ER strategy of distraction will predict engaged cognitive ER strategies in middle childhood/pre-adolescence. To provide additional developmental information, Aim 2 is to test whether child age at the follow up assessment (ranging 8-14 years) moderates the relation between behavioral ER strategies at age 3 and cognitive emotion regulatory strategies in middle childhood/pre-adolescence. Hypothesis 2: Because older children will have undergone more development underlying cognitive ER strategies, relations specified in Hypotheses 1a and 1b will strengthen across older ages. Finally, the Exploratory Aim is to test theoretically-supported individual (i.e., temperament) and environmental (i.e., family emotional environment) variables as potential mediators or moderators of the relation between behavioral ER strategies at age 3 and cognitive ER strategies in middle childhood-preadolescence. The investigators expect inhibited temperament to be involved in the link between behavioral ER strategies and avoidant cognitive ER strategies, effortful control to be involved in the link between behavioral ER strategies and engaged cognitive ER strategies, and the emotional family environment to be involved in linking behavioral ER strategies to both avoidant and engaged ER strategies.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Children (8 to 14 years) will be invited to come to a 1.5 hour laboratory assessment with a parent (most likely, mothers). We will gather parent-reported and children's self-reported avoidant and engaged cognitive ER strategies, worded with third or first person, respectively. "Short form" versions will be used to reduce burden for children. The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents provides a 6 item reappraisal scale and a 4 item expressive suppression scale. The Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth - Short Form provides an 8-item measure of experiential avoidance. The extended version of the Children's Response Styles Questionnaire provides a 5 item scale of problem-solving (also, "reflection") and a 5 item scale of rumination (also, "brooding"). Mothers will complete the Children's Responses to Feelings Checklist, which asks about these ER strategies in response to specific emotions, to examine specificity to uncertainty/fear.

The investigators will also assess "in-vivo" use of cognitive ER strategies by using an ER strategy interview after children experience uncertainty via laboratory procedures. Children will watch a 2-minute clip from a live-action movie validated to elicit emotion in the domain of uncertainty with school-aged children. The primary experimenter will interview the child about the cognitive ER strategies they used using open-ended questions with subsequent prompts to allow reports of multiple strategies. The primary experimenter will then ask closed-ended (yes/no) interview questions about each of the cognitive ER strategies of focus. Children will also complete two 5 minute tasks from the Laboratory Temperament Assessment Battery - Middle Childhood Version with established reliability and validity in the domain of uncertainty. In the "Storytelling" task, the experimenter will instruct the child to stand and tell a story about the previous day in front of them and an unfamiliar research assistant (RA), enacting a series of standardized pauses and prompts until the child indicates they are finished. In the "Mask" episode, the child enters a room to see an adult RA wearing a mask resembling a disfigured face. The RA completes a standardized script of statements and pauses, finally taking off the mask and engaging the child in a friendly manner. The primary experimenter will repeat the ER strategy interview for the tasks. Auxiliary ER-relevant outcomes may supplement the primary focus on cognitive ER strategies. Behavioral tasks (Storytelling, Mask) can be coded for behavioral ER strategies (distraction, self-soothing, bids to experimenter). The investigators possess the necessary equipment and software for recording and analysis of children's ECG and respiration to serve as physiological indicators of ER. As an additional indicator of family emotional environment, the child and mother will be prompted to converse about the activities in the lab.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Emotion Regulation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

All children will experience brief standardized laboratory tasks according to the same protocol.
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Emotion regulation observation in middle childhood/pre-adolescence

All participants will engage in brief laboratory tasks that are designed to elicit a brief experience of emotion/uncertainty.

Group Type OTHER

Laboratory tasks in middle childhood/pre-adolescence

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Children will watch a 2-minute clip from a live-action movie and complete Storytelling and Mask tasks from the Laboratory Temperament Assessment Battery.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Laboratory tasks in middle childhood/pre-adolescence

Children will watch a 2-minute clip from a live-action movie and complete Storytelling and Mask tasks from the Laboratory Temperament Assessment Battery.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Family participated in previous phases of this ongoing longitudinal study
* Child was 35-42 months old for the age 3 assessment (pre-existing data)
* Child is between 8 and 14 years of age for proposed data collection
* Mothers were older than 18 years of age at original enrollment (pre-existing data).
* Mothers were able to complete study procedures in English.

Exclusion Criteria

* Informed consent/assent is declined
* Child diagnosed with a developmental disability or chronic health condition related to deviations in expected emotional development.
Minimum Eligible Age

8 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

14 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, Riverside

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Miami University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Elizabeth J. Kiel Luebbe, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Miami University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Miami University Department of Psychology

Oxford, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KielR032022

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cognitive Control and Metacognition Training
NCT06885684 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Executive Function in Early Childhood
NCT03713125 RECRUITING NA
Relationship Enhancement Digital Game
NCT07170553 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA