Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-06-30
2019-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
These findings will complement the ecologically valid data from week-long at-home deployments of the interactive prototype with families with low socioeconomic status.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Use of a Social Assistance Robot in a Population of Children Subjected to Prolonged Isolation
NCT06405620
Robot-Mediated Intervention for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders
NCT02617342
The Efficacy of Robot-enhanced Therapy for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders
NCT03323931
Using Social Robots in Children With Rare Diseases and Their Parents: A Feasibility Study
NCT06466109
Efficacy of Tools of the Mind for Enhancing Self-Control in Preschoolers
NCT02462733
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The original TSST-C protocol consists of a preparation period, public speaking task and mental arithmetic task. The investigators have chosen to only use the preparation period, public speaking task and anticipation of the mental arithmetic task as stressors, as pilots suggest that these suffice to elicit a strong-enough stress response that will allow us to test the toy's efficacy; and it would be unethical to subject children to unnecessary tasks.
== Study protocol: ==
On arrival to the room where the experiment will take place, children in both groups will be informed that there are three tasks involved in the study:
1. giving a speech,
2. a calculation task, and
3. helping a newly discovered creature (the toy) which appears to be anxious calm down.
The children will then be fitted with the Empatica E4 wristband which will continuously and non-intrusively monitor their heart rate and skin conductance, and introduced to the toy in order to limit the impact of the novelty effect associated with it. Participants in the control group will be asked to imagine that the toy is a creature which is anxious, while participants in the experimental group will also be told that the creature's heartbeat is fast when it is anxious and slows down when it calms down. The researcher will demonstrate three soothing interactions with the toy (cuddling, stroking, and slow breathing) for 30 seconds and then give the children the toy for 1 minute, after which it will be returned to the researcher.
Following this introduction, participants will stay in the room for 10 minutes reading pictures books if they would like to in order to establish baseline stress levels. After 10 minutes have passed, the researcher will administer the state anxiety scale of the State Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAI-CH).
Participants will then hear the beginning of a story and will be asked to finish it in a manner as exciting as possible in front of a microphone and a camera. Participants will be told that other study participants will do the same and will be prompted to perform better than them, even though in reality they will not be judged for their performance. Participants will remain in the room for 5 minutes preparing their story.
After the preparation period the researcher will administer the state anxiety scale for the second time. Following this, participants will be asked to stand in front of the microphone, the camera and the researcher, and finish the story as excitingly as possible in 3 minutes. If the participant finishes the story in less than 3 minutes, the researcher will ask them to continue in a friendly, supportive manner for a maximum of 3 times, using lines like "You are doing very well. You have to continue for a little bit longer, there is still more time to say your story."
After the speech task is completed the researcher will administer the state anxiety scale for the third time. Following this, the researcher will tell participants that it is time for the calculation task, which will supposedly be asking them to mentally subtract by 7's from a three-digit number. After saying this, the researcher will pretend that there are some issues with the camera that need to be fixed before they can start, and that they will have to shift the order of the two remaining tasks so that they have more time to fix the camera. At this point children will be exposed to one of the two conditions (interactive or non-interactive toy) for 5 minutes, following which they will complete the state anxiety scale for the final time.
The researcher will then tell children that due to the technical issues and time constraints they will not have to do the calculation task, but can rather move on to the last part of the study which is a 10-minute debriefing and feedback session. Every child will be told that they performed extremely well and that the experimenters pretended that they competing with the other participants to induce competitive conditions. The debriefing session will include a manipulation check (how stressfully the experienced the preparation period, speech task and anticipation of mental arithmetic task period) and a short interview about their experience, which will be audio-recorded.
At the end of the procedure, children will be allowed to relax in the room for 15 minutes. The researcher will suggest that they play with the interactive toy; sit down and take deep breaths; listen to guided mindfulness sessions; or read one of the age-appropriate books in the room.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control group: Non-interactive toy prototype
30 children will be given the same toy as participants in the experimental group, but without the interactive features (haptic feedback).
Non-interactive toy prototype
This toy is the same as the interactive one, but with the interactivity features (haptic feedback) turned off so that it looks and feels like a regular, hand-crafted plush toy.
Experimental: Interactive toy prototype
30 children will be given the same toy as participants in the control group, but with the interactive features (haptic feedback).
Interactive toy prototype
The interactive toy prototype takes the form of a hand-crafted plush toy, which was designed to support in-the-moment calming down strategies. The interaction relies on a number of sensors embedded in the 'creature' that register haptic interactions with the toy. In addition, a small vibration motor is used to indicate the creature's state by mimicking a frantic 'heartbeat'. If the creature is calming down in response to the child's touching of the sensors, the heartbeat slows down and eventually turns into happy purring (cf. paper linked below for more details about the design process).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Interactive toy prototype
The interactive toy prototype takes the form of a hand-crafted plush toy, which was designed to support in-the-moment calming down strategies. The interaction relies on a number of sensors embedded in the 'creature' that register haptic interactions with the toy. In addition, a small vibration motor is used to indicate the creature's state by mimicking a frantic 'heartbeat'. If the creature is calming down in response to the child's touching of the sensors, the heartbeat slows down and eventually turns into happy purring (cf. paper linked below for more details about the design process).
Non-interactive toy prototype
This toy is the same as the interactive one, but with the interactivity features (haptic feedback) turned off so that it looks and feels like a regular, hand-crafted plush toy.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Understand English sufficiently to take part and complete study materials
Exclusion Criteria
* Does not understand English sufficiently to take part and complete study materials
7 Years
10 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families
OTHER
University of California Santa Cruz
OTHER
Committee for Children (USA)
UNKNOWN
University College, London
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Petr Slovak, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University College London; Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University College London
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
3923/005
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.