Comparison of Histology From a Mesh Sponge and Traditional Esophageal Biopsies in Children and Adolescents With EoE

NCT ID: NCT05342168

Last Updated: 2022-04-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-04-01

Study Completion Date

2023-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the present study is determining the accuracy, safety and tolerance of the CytospongeTM (expandable sponge within a gelatin capsule attached to a string) relative to traditional upper endoscopy and esophageal biopsies in older children and adolescents with a diagnosis of Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) to follow up on treatment changes. The findings from this study could help determine whether the CytospongeTM is a more cost-effective alternative to traditional upper endoscopy for histologic follow-up in children and adolescents with EoE.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a cross-sectional study in pediatric subjects comparing histologic findings on esophageal biopsies obtained during upper GI endoscopies to histologic findings on tissue samples obtained through the use of the CytospongeTM in a group of paediatric patients with a diagnosis of EoE. Subjects will swallow the Cytosponge capsule (attached to a string) several hours prior to their scheduled endoscopy for treatment assessment. An esophageal sample will be obtained by withdrawing the expanded sponge thru the esophagus. This will be sent to pathology and fixed and stained. The subject will also undergo routine upper endoscopy under conscious sedation and follow up biopsies obtained as per routine standard of care to assess current treatment for EoE. There will be a blinded comparison between the biopsies and the Cytosponge sample by two pediatric pathologist with experience with EoE. Subjects and their caregivers will also be surveyed on their experience using the Cytosponge compared to having endoscopy.

This study has been performed in adults with Eosinophilic Esophagitis and found that the samples obtained with the Cytosponge was equivalent to the endoscopically obtained biopspes with out having to use endoscopy. Adult subjects also preferred the Sponge over having an endoscopy. The Cytosponge was shown to be safe and effected. Even larger adult trials in screening for esophageal cancer have shown the Cytosponge is safe and effective at sampling the esophagus.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

cross sectional study comparing to tissue sampling methods
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Each sample type is read by a pathologist blinded to the traditional ly obtained biopsy

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Histology

Specimen samples from the tradition pinch esophageal biopsy and the supernatant sample obtained from the mesh sponge (Cytosponge TM) will each be fixed and stained. The eosinophil count per high power field for the mesh sponge sample and the traditional biopsy sample will be compared for each subject.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Using a swallowed expanding sponge (Cytosponge TM) to obtain sampling of the esophageal musosa

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

A gelatin capsule containing the collapsed mesh sponge is swallowed with an attached string fixed to the cheek. After 8 minutes the gelatin capsule will have dissolved and the expanded soft mesh sponge can be with drawn sampling the surface of the esophagus on the way out. The sponge then will be spun and the supernant fixed, processed and stained.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Using a swallowed expanding sponge (Cytosponge TM) to obtain sampling of the esophageal musosa

A gelatin capsule containing the collapsed mesh sponge is swallowed with an attached string fixed to the cheek. After 8 minutes the gelatin capsule will have dissolved and the expanded soft mesh sponge can be with drawn sampling the surface of the esophagus on the way out. The sponge then will be spun and the supernant fixed, processed and stained.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Cytosponge

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Previous histologic diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis (symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and at least 15 eosinophils per high-power field on esophageal biopsy and after a comprehensive assessment of non-EoE disorders that could cause or potentially contribute to esophageal eosinophilia).1
* Capable of swallowing a capsule 3 cm in length (trial with 3 cm jelly candy).
* 10 to 18 years of age.
* Male or female.
* Able to give assent or consent.
* Scheduled for an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with biopsies on the same day to assess response to therapy and make decisions regarding further management.

Exclusion Criteria

* Unable to swallow the capsule.
* Unable to give assent or consent.
* History of esophageal stricture on either upper gastrointestinal barium study or previous upper gastrointestinal endoscopy of food impaction that required removal.
* History of portal hypertension or esophageal varices.
* History of solid organ transplantation.
* Known bleeding diathesis.
* On anticoagulation therapy.
* Known platelet count less than normal for age.
* Pregnancy.
* Need for intubation during endoscopy.
* History of previous esophageal surgery.
Minimum Eligible Age

10 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Hospital for Sick Children

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Margaret Marcon

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Margaret Marcon, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Hospital for Sick Children

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sickkids

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Kristen Bortolin, MD

Role: CONTACT

4168137735

Margaret Marcon, MD

Role: CONTACT

4168137735

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Kristen Bortolin, MD

Role: primary

4168137735

Margaret Marcon, MD

Role: backup

14168135217

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Katzka DA, Geno DM, Ravi A, Smyrk TC, Lao-Sirieix P, Miremadi A, Debiram I, O'Donovan M, Kita H, Kephart GM, Kryzer LA, Camilleri M, Alexander JA, Fitzgerald RC. Accuracy, safety, and tolerability of tissue collection by Cytosponge vs endoscopy for evaluation of eosinophilic esophagitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jan;13(1):77-83.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.06.026. Epub 2014 Jul 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24997328 (View on PubMed)

Katzka DA, Smyrk TC, Alexander JA, Geno DM, Beitia RA, Chang AO, Shaheen NJ, Fitzgerald RC, Dellon ES. Accuracy and Safety of the Cytosponge for Assessing Histologic Activity in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Two-Center Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Oct;112(10):1538-1544. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.244. Epub 2017 Aug 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28809387 (View on PubMed)

Januszewicz W, Tan WK, Lehovsky K, Debiram-Beecham I, Nuckcheddy T, Moist S, Kadri S, di Pietro M, Boussioutas A, Shaheen NJ, Katzka DA, Dellon ES, Fitzgerald RC; BEST1 and BEST2 study investigators. Safety and Acceptability of Esophageal Cytosponge Cell Collection Device in a Pooled Analysis of Data From Individual Patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Mar;17(4):647-656.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.07.043. Epub 2018 Aug 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30099104 (View on PubMed)

Benaglia T, Sharples LD, Fitzgerald RC, Lyratzopoulos G. Health benefits and cost effectiveness of endoscopic and nonendoscopic cytosponge screening for Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2013 Jan;144(1):62-73.e6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.09.060. Epub 2012 Oct 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23041329 (View on PubMed)

Dellon ES, Liacouras CA, Molina-Infante J, Furuta GT, Spergel JM, Zevit N, Spechler SJ, Attwood SE, Straumann A, Aceves SS, Alexander JA, Atkins D, Arva NC, Blanchard C, Bonis PA, Book WM, Capocelli KE, Chehade M, Cheng E, Collins MH, Davis CM, Dias JA, Di Lorenzo C, Dohil R, Dupont C, Falk GW, Ferreira CT, Fox A, Gonsalves NP, Gupta SK, Katzka DA, Kinoshita Y, Menard-Katcher C, Kodroff E, Metz DC, Miehlke S, Muir AB, Mukkada VA, Murch S, Nurko S, Ohtsuka Y, Orel R, Papadopoulou A, Peterson KA, Philpott H, Putnam PE, Richter JE, Rosen R, Rothenberg ME, Schoepfer A, Scott MM, Shah N, Sheikh J, Souza RF, Strobel MJ, Talley NJ, Vaezi MF, Vandenplas Y, Vieira MC, Walker MM, Wechsler JB, Wershil BK, Wen T, Yang GY, Hirano I, Bredenoord AJ. Updated International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria for Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Proceedings of the AGREE Conference. Gastroenterology. 2018 Oct;155(4):1022-1033.e10. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.009. Epub 2018 Sep 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30009819 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

10000073082

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Outcome of Children With Eosinophilic Esophagitis
NCT06190080 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
EDN and Eosinophilic Esophagitis
NCT06387030 RECRUITING NA