Comparison of Histology From a Mesh Sponge and Traditional Esophageal Biopsies in Children and Adolescents With EoE
NCT ID: NCT05342168
Last Updated: 2022-04-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-04-01
2023-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Diagnosis and Monitoring of Eosinophilic Esophagitis Using the Cytosponge
NCT02114606
Capsule Sponge Study in Eosinophilic Oesophagitis
NCT06501274
Use of Esophageal String Test to Understand Symptoms, Inflammation, and Function in Eosinophilic Esophagitis
NCT03305653
Cytosponge Adequacy Study Evaluation II
NCT02395471
Swallowing Characteristics of Pediatric Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis
NCT04704752
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study has been performed in adults with Eosinophilic Esophagitis and found that the samples obtained with the Cytosponge was equivalent to the endoscopically obtained biopspes with out having to use endoscopy. Adult subjects also preferred the Sponge over having an endoscopy. The Cytosponge was shown to be safe and effected. Even larger adult trials in screening for esophageal cancer have shown the Cytosponge is safe and effective at sampling the esophagus.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Histology
Specimen samples from the tradition pinch esophageal biopsy and the supernatant sample obtained from the mesh sponge (Cytosponge TM) will each be fixed and stained. The eosinophil count per high power field for the mesh sponge sample and the traditional biopsy sample will be compared for each subject.
Using a swallowed expanding sponge (Cytosponge TM) to obtain sampling of the esophageal musosa
A gelatin capsule containing the collapsed mesh sponge is swallowed with an attached string fixed to the cheek. After 8 minutes the gelatin capsule will have dissolved and the expanded soft mesh sponge can be with drawn sampling the surface of the esophagus on the way out. The sponge then will be spun and the supernant fixed, processed and stained.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Using a swallowed expanding sponge (Cytosponge TM) to obtain sampling of the esophageal musosa
A gelatin capsule containing the collapsed mesh sponge is swallowed with an attached string fixed to the cheek. After 8 minutes the gelatin capsule will have dissolved and the expanded soft mesh sponge can be with drawn sampling the surface of the esophagus on the way out. The sponge then will be spun and the supernant fixed, processed and stained.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Capable of swallowing a capsule 3 cm in length (trial with 3 cm jelly candy).
* 10 to 18 years of age.
* Male or female.
* Able to give assent or consent.
* Scheduled for an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with biopsies on the same day to assess response to therapy and make decisions regarding further management.
Exclusion Criteria
* Unable to give assent or consent.
* History of esophageal stricture on either upper gastrointestinal barium study or previous upper gastrointestinal endoscopy of food impaction that required removal.
* History of portal hypertension or esophageal varices.
* History of solid organ transplantation.
* Known bleeding diathesis.
* On anticoagulation therapy.
* Known platelet count less than normal for age.
* Pregnancy.
* Need for intubation during endoscopy.
* History of previous esophageal surgery.
10 Years
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Hospital for Sick Children
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Margaret Marcon
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Margaret Marcon, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Hospital for Sick Children
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sickkids
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Katzka DA, Geno DM, Ravi A, Smyrk TC, Lao-Sirieix P, Miremadi A, Debiram I, O'Donovan M, Kita H, Kephart GM, Kryzer LA, Camilleri M, Alexander JA, Fitzgerald RC. Accuracy, safety, and tolerability of tissue collection by Cytosponge vs endoscopy for evaluation of eosinophilic esophagitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jan;13(1):77-83.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.06.026. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
Katzka DA, Smyrk TC, Alexander JA, Geno DM, Beitia RA, Chang AO, Shaheen NJ, Fitzgerald RC, Dellon ES. Accuracy and Safety of the Cytosponge for Assessing Histologic Activity in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Two-Center Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Oct;112(10):1538-1544. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.244. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
Januszewicz W, Tan WK, Lehovsky K, Debiram-Beecham I, Nuckcheddy T, Moist S, Kadri S, di Pietro M, Boussioutas A, Shaheen NJ, Katzka DA, Dellon ES, Fitzgerald RC; BEST1 and BEST2 study investigators. Safety and Acceptability of Esophageal Cytosponge Cell Collection Device in a Pooled Analysis of Data From Individual Patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Mar;17(4):647-656.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.07.043. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
Benaglia T, Sharples LD, Fitzgerald RC, Lyratzopoulos G. Health benefits and cost effectiveness of endoscopic and nonendoscopic cytosponge screening for Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2013 Jan;144(1):62-73.e6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.09.060. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
Dellon ES, Liacouras CA, Molina-Infante J, Furuta GT, Spergel JM, Zevit N, Spechler SJ, Attwood SE, Straumann A, Aceves SS, Alexander JA, Atkins D, Arva NC, Blanchard C, Bonis PA, Book WM, Capocelli KE, Chehade M, Cheng E, Collins MH, Davis CM, Dias JA, Di Lorenzo C, Dohil R, Dupont C, Falk GW, Ferreira CT, Fox A, Gonsalves NP, Gupta SK, Katzka DA, Kinoshita Y, Menard-Katcher C, Kodroff E, Metz DC, Miehlke S, Muir AB, Mukkada VA, Murch S, Nurko S, Ohtsuka Y, Orel R, Papadopoulou A, Peterson KA, Philpott H, Putnam PE, Richter JE, Rosen R, Rothenberg ME, Schoepfer A, Scott MM, Shah N, Sheikh J, Souza RF, Strobel MJ, Talley NJ, Vaezi MF, Vandenplas Y, Vieira MC, Walker MM, Wechsler JB, Wershil BK, Wen T, Yang GY, Hirano I, Bredenoord AJ. Updated International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria for Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Proceedings of the AGREE Conference. Gastroenterology. 2018 Oct;155(4):1022-1033.e10. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.009. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
10000073082
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.