Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
PHASE3
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-09-30
2023-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Morphine Versus Methadone As First Line Strong Opioid for Cancer Pain
NCT00634010
Efficacy and Safety of Ultra-low Dose Methadone as Adjuvant Analgesic in Cancer Patients With Pain
NCT02687347
Methadone Versus Morphine for Cancer-Related Pain
NCT00573937
Methadone, Morphine, or Oxycodone in Treating Pain in Patients With Cancer
NCT00726830
Sublingual Methadone for the Management of Cancer-related Procedure Pain in Inpatients
NCT00351637
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methadone is an opioid that has been used for over 80 years to treat various types of pain, including cancer pain. Its use as a co-analgesic and first-line treatment for cancer pain is becoming more widespread. Despite its increasing popularity, there remain some outstanding questions regarding its use in treating cancer pain, such as its efficacy compared to other opioids and its appropriateness as a first-line treatment.
Traditional classifications of cancer related chronic pain is classified as neuropathic and nociceptive (somatic or visceral). This classification is based on clinical descriptors as opposed to pathophysiologic mechanisms. The investigators propose a new mechanism, called 'adenocarcinopathic' pain (ACPP), which can be defined as pain caused by an adenocarcinoma that is in 'proximity' to or invading a nerve or nerve plexus. The suggested mechanism of ACPP is that the tumour excretes excess glutamate, which activates NMDA receptors on nearby sensory nerves, causing the pain sensation. As methadone is an NMDA antagonist (and mu receptor agonist), it becomes an interesting molecule for ACPP in comparison to other opioids (such as morphine) that are unable to suppress NMDA receptors.
Study Hypothesis:
Methadone will demonstrate superior efficacy to morphine for the treatment of ACPP, and physicians will demonstrate satisfactory confidence in its use.
Study Objectives:
1. Monitor safety and response to treatment
2. Evaluate the confidence of physicians
Study Design:
Participants will be randomized to receive either methadone or morphine. Patients will be observed for a period of 14 days, plus one physician follow-up after 28 days.
Sample Size \& Study Population:
The investigators will aim to enrol n=40 patients total across all sites. Eligible outpatients are those for whom a strong opioid is being initiated or escalated for the treatment of ACPP.
Intervention:
For patients previously taking 0-30mg morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD), starting dose is 0.5mg Q4H for methadone, 2.5mg for morphine. For those previously taking 31-60 mg MEDD, starting dose is 1.0mg Q4H for methadone, 5.0mg for morphine. Up to 4 breakthrough analgesia doses allowed per day. Dose escalations can be made at each patient encounter according to a standard dosing schedule.
Study Outcome Measures:
Using validated questionnaires, the patient's degree of pain control \& relief, degree of satisfaction, global impression of change, and any side effects will be assessed. In addition, physicians will be asked to rate their confidence in treating each patient.
Expected Outcomes:
Positive results should provide justification to prolong the study to complete a phase III trial.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Methadone
DESCRIPTION:
Blinded methadone 1mg tablets PO
\--
DOSAGE:
A) For patients initially taking 0-30 mg MEDD:
Starting dose: 0.5mg Q4H x 4 doses + 1.0mg QHS + 0.5mg Q2H PRN (max 4 doses)
First increase: 1.0 mg Q4H x 4 doses + 2.0mg QHS + 0.5mg Q2H PRN (max 4 doses)
Second increase: 1.5mg Q4H x 4 doses + 3.0mg QHS + 0.5mg Q2H PRN (max 4 doses)
Third increase: 2.0mg Q4H x 4 doses + 4.0mg QHS + 1.0mg Q2H PRN (max 4 doses)
Fourth increase: 2.5mg Q4H x 4 doses + 5.0mg QHS + 1.0mg Q2H PRN (max 4 doses)
B) For patients initially taking 31-60 mg MEDD:
Starting dose: 1.0mg Q4H x 4 doses + 2.0mg QHS + 0.5mg Q2H PRN (max 4 doses)
First increase: 1.5mg Q4H x 4 doses + 3.0mg QHS + 1.0mg Q2H PRN (max 4 doses)
Second increase: 2.0mg Q4H x 4 doses + 4.0mg QHS + 1.0mg Q2H PRN (max 4 doses)
Third increase: 2.5mg Q4H x 4 doses + 5.0mg QHS + 1.5mg Q2H PRN (max 4 doses)
Fourth increase: 3.0mg Q4H x 4 doses + 6.0mg QHS + 1.5mg Q2H PRN (max 4 doses)
Methadone
Methadone
Morphine
DESCRIPTION:
Blinded morphine 5mg tablets PO
\--
DOSAGE:
A) For patients initially taking 0-30 mg MEDD:
Starting dose: 2.5mg Q4H x 4 doses + 5.0mg QHS + 2.5mg Q2H PRN (max 4 doses)
First increase: 5.0 mg Q4H x 4 doses + 10.0mg QHS + 2.5mg Q2H PRN (max 4 doses)
Second increase: 7.5mg Q4H x 4 doses + 15.0mg QHS + 2.5mg Q2H PRN (max 4 doses)
Third increase: 10.0mg Q4H x 4 doses + 20.0mg QHS + 5.0mg Q2H PRN (max 4 doses)
Fourth increase: 12.5mg Q4H x 4 doses + 25.0mg QHS + 5.0mg Q2H PRN (max 4 doses)
B) For patients initially taking 31-60 mg MEDD:
Starting dose: 5.0mg Q4H x 4 doses + 10.0mg QHS + 2.5mg Q2H PRN (max 4 doses)
First increase: 7.5mg Q4H x 4 doses + 15.0mg QHS + 5.0mg Q2H PRN (max 4 doses)
Second increase: 10.0mg Q4H x 4 doses + 20.0mg QHS + 5.0mg Q2H PRN (max 4 doses)
Third increase: 12.5mg Q4H x 4 doses + 25.0mg QHS + 12.5mg Q2H PRN (max 4 doses)
Fourth increase: 15.0mg Q4H x 4 doses + 30.0mg QHS + 12.5mg Q2H PRN (max 4 doses)
Morphine
Morphine
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Methadone
Methadone
Morphine
Morphine
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* In the physician's opinion, mechanism of pain is most likely linked to an adenocarcinoma 'in proximity to' or invading a nerve or nerve plexus (i.e., 'adenocarcinopathic' pain; ACPP);
* Experiencing poorly controlled pain (defined as pain of 4 or higher on a 10-point visual analogue scale) despite the use of non-opioid analgesics or despite the regular use of up to 60 mg morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD);
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) of 0 to 2;
* Estimated prognosis of at least 3 months;
* Able to fill out questionnaires and understand procedures in English and/or French;
* Able to provide first person informed consent;
* Physician deems it appropriate to start the patient on the opioid.
Exclusion Criteria
* Taking at least one medication that increases risk of Torsades de Pointes (TdP): cisapride, disopyramide, dofetilide, flecainide, procainamide, propafenone, quinidine, quinine, sotalol;
* History of opioid abuse or dependence using Edmonton Pain Classification;
* Has geographic difficulties with follow-up in person;
* Has any of the following comorbidities: documented class 3 or 4 New York Heart Association (NYHA) heart failure, myocardial infarction in the last 3 months, unstable angina, pericardial disease, oxygen dependent pulmonary diseases, Parkinson's disease, suspected or diagnosed dementia, bipolar disorder, poorly managed major depression (current or treated) or anxiety disorder;
* Taking medication known to have clinically significant interactions with the CYP450 enzyme: carbamazepine, efavirenz, phenobarbital, rifampicin, azole antifungals, antiretrovirals, grapefruit juice, clarithromycin, erythromycin;
* Diagnosed with Child-Pugh class B and/or C cirrhosis;
* Has hepatic insufficiency, defined as jaundice with irreversible hyperbilirubinemia of at least 34 micromol/L despite biliary tract stents (severity criteria in Child-Pugh-Turcotte score);
* Received radiation or any nerve block or plexus block on the same side as the pain in the past 14 days or PLANNED within the next 14 days;
* PLANNED prescription for daily co-analgesia with pregabalin, gabapentin, or dexamethasone during the next 14 days (not including dexamethasone with chemotherapy);
* Taking medication associated with major risk of serotonin syndrome (monoamine oxidase inhibitors; MAOIs): linezolid, moclobemide, rasagiline, selegiline;
* Taking medication known to be an opioid agonist, antagonist, or partial agonist: naltrexone, buprenorphine, tapentadol, tramadol;
* Other negative characteristic as per physician discretion (e.g., reduced renal function).
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Bruyère Health Research Institute.
OTHER
The Ottawa Hospital
OTHER
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bruno Gagnon, MD MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centre de recherche du CHU de Quebec
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bruera E, Palmer JL, Bosnjak S, Rico MA, Moyano J, Sweeney C, Strasser F, Willey J, Bertolino M, Mathias C, Spruyt O, Fisch MJ. Methadone versus morphine as a first-line strong opioid for cancer pain: a randomized, double-blind study. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jan 1;22(1):185-92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.03.172.
Mercadante S, Bruera E. Methadone as a First-Line Opioid in Cancer Pain Management: A Systematic Review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Mar;55(3):998-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.10.017. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
Haumann J, Geurts JW, van Kuijk SM, Kremer B, Joosten EA, van den Beuken-van Everdingen MH. Methadone is superior to fentanyl in treating neuropathic pain in patients with head-and-neck cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2016 Sep;65:121-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.06.025. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
Leppert W, Zajaczkowska R, Wordliczek J, Dobrogowski J, Woron J, Krzakowski M. Pathophysiology and clinical characteristics of pain in most common locations in cancer patients. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2016 Dec;67(6):787-799.
Slosky LM, BassiriRad NM, Symons AM, Thompson M, Doyle T, Forte BL, Staatz WD, Bui L, Neumann WL, Mantyh PW, Salvemini D, Largent-Milnes TM, Vanderah TW. The cystine/glutamate antiporter system xc- drives breast tumor cell glutamate release and cancer-induced bone pain. Pain. 2016 Nov;157(11):2605-2616. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000681.
Gagnon B, Almahrezi A, Schreier G. Methadone in the treatment of neuropathic pain. Pain Res Manag. 2003 Fall;8(3):149-54. doi: 10.1155/2003/236718.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
638423678
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.