RCT Comparing the Analgesic Efficacy of 4 Therapeutic Strategies Based on 4 Different Major Opioids (Fentanyl, Oxycodone, Buprenorphine vs Morphine) in Cancer Patients With Moderate/Severe Pain, at the Moment of Starting 3rd Step of WHO Analgesic Ladder.

NCT ID: NCT01809106

Last Updated: 2015-12-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

518 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-04-30

Study Completion Date

2014-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Pain, in neoplastic disease, is a symptom with severe negative impact on the quality of life of patients and a high incidence, with values around 70-90% in advanced and metastatic stages. Than 20 years the main reference for the pharmacological treatment of cancer pain are the guidelines produced by the World Health Organization (WHO). This document shows that the use of opioid drugs is the mainstay of treatment, with particular reference to opioids "major" (3 rd step of the analgesic ladder). The 4 opioids more most commonly prescribed in Italy (oral morphine and oxycodone, fentanyl and buprenorphine transdermal), based on the data currently available, have an analgesic effect would partly overlap but with different percentages of non-responders (NR), a different need to increase the dose over time to maintain adequate analgesia, a different action to the switch to another molecule for ineffectiveness analgesic. The observations described suggest that opioids, although they belong to the same family drug may not be fully comparable with regard to the clinical effects products. Important differences are known on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic and, more recently, also in terms of pharmacogenomics. This is a comparative study of analgesic strategies based on the use of the 4 mentioned opioids, going to look for possible differences in terms of analgesic efficacy, changes in dose over time, use of switch or permanent abandonment of treatment, parallel to the contour of the side effects. The associated sub-project will link the structure gene of patients and clinical results have emerged.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cancer Cancer Pain

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

cancer pain major opioid analgesics

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Morphine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Morphine

Intervention Type DRUG

60 mg /24 ore

Oxycodone

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Oxycodone

Intervention Type DRUG

40 mg /24 ore

Buprenorphine

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Buprenorphine

Intervention Type DRUG

35 microg/h

Fentanyl

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Fentanyl

Intervention Type DRUG

25 microg/h

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Morphine

60 mg /24 ore

Intervention Type DRUG

Fentanyl

25 microg/h

Intervention Type DRUG

Buprenorphine

35 microg/h

Intervention Type DRUG

Oxycodone

40 mg /24 ore

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients with diagnostic (histological or cytological) evidence of locally advanced or metastatic solid tumour;
* with average pain intensity ≥ 4, measured with NRS and related to the last 24 hours, due to the cancer, requiring for the first time an analgesic treatment with 3rd step/WHO opioids
* with life expectancy \> one month
* "strong" opioid naïve;
* eligible to take any of the medications under evaluation, by TDS or by mouth;
* with age ≥ 18 years;

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients recruited in other researches that conflict or may confound the conduction and results of the present study;
* Lack of informed consent;
* with presence of other diseases, including psychiatric/mental illness, severe senile or other form of dementia, that can interfere with participation and compliance with the study protocol or can contraindicate the use of the investigational drugs;
* with presence of co-morbidities, which could create potentially dangerous drug interactions with opioids (eg, use of macrolide antibiotics or antifungal,….);
* any kind of contraindications to the use of opioid drugs;
* Patients with a known story, past or current, of drugs abuse or addiction;
* Use of drugs which presents a combination of opioids and other molecule (as NSAIDs, paracetamol, naloxone, ..);
* Patients who cannot guarantee regular follow-up visits for logistic or geographic reasons;
* Need of starting 3rd step treatment in an "emergency clinical situation" that do not allow the correct procedures of randomization;
* diagnosis of primary brain tumor or leukaemia;
* diagnosis of chronic renal failure;
* patients with antalgic radiotherapy or radio-metabolic therapy in progress or completed less than 14 days before study;
* patients starting a first line chemotherapy simultaneously to the beginning of the study;
* other types of analgesic treatments, including local-regional anesthetic techniques or neurosurgical /ablative methods.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Oscar Corli, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mario Negri Institute of Pharmacological Research - IRCCS

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ospedale S. Marta

Catania, Italy, Italy

Site Status

Fondazione IRCCS - Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori

Milan, Italy, Italy

Site Status

Istituto Scientifico San Raffaele

Milan, Italy, Italy

Site Status

Azienda Ospedaliera Valtellina-Valchiavenna

Morbegno, Italy, Italy

Site Status

Multimedica

Sesto San Giovanni, Italy, Italy

Site Status

Ospedale Gradenigo

Torino, Italy, Italy

Site Status

Ospedale Civile di Piacenza

Piacenza, Piacenza, Italy

Site Status

Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova Azienda Ospedaliera

Reggio Emilia, RE, Italy

Site Status

Ospedale San Giovanni Battista di Torino

Torino, Torino, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Apolone G, Bertetto O, Caraceni A, Corli O, De Conno F, Labianca R, Maltoni M, Nicora M, Torri V, Zucco F; Cancer Pain Outcome Research Study Group. Pain in cancer. An outcome research project to evaluate the epidemiology, the quality and the effects of pain treatment in cancer patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Feb 2;4:7. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16457716 (View on PubMed)

Apolone G, Corli O, Caraceni A, Negri E, Deandrea S, Montanari M, Greco MT; Cancer Pain Outcome Research Study Group (CPOR SG) Investigators. Pattern and quality of care of cancer pain management. Results from the Cancer Pain Outcome Research Study Group. Br J Cancer. 2009 May 19;100(10):1566-74. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605053. Epub 2009 Apr 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19401688 (View on PubMed)

Greco MT, Corli O, Montanari M, Deandrea S, Zagonel V, Apolone G; Writing Protocol Committee; Cancer Pain Outcome Research Study Group (CPOR SG) Investigators. Epidemiology and pattern of care of breakthrough cancer pain in a longitudinal sample of cancer patients: results from the Cancer Pain Outcome Research Study Group. Clin J Pain. 2011 Jan;27(1):9-18. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181edc250.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20842024 (View on PubMed)

Apolone G, Deandrea S, Montanari M, Corli O, Greco MT, Cavuto S. Evaluation of the comparative analgesic effectiveness of transdermal and oral opioids in cancer patients: a propensity score analysis. Eur J Pain. 2012 Feb;16(2):229-38. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2011.00020.x. Epub 2011 Dec 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22323375 (View on PubMed)

Corli O, Montanari M, Deandrea S, Greco MT, Villani W, Apolone G. An exploratory analysis on the effectiveness of four strong opioids in patients with cancer pain. Pain Med. 2012 Jul;13(7):897-907. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01408.x. Epub 2012 Jun 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22680789 (View on PubMed)

Corli O, Roberto A, Bennett MI, Galli F, Corsi N, Rulli E, Antonione R. Nonresponsiveness and Susceptibility of Opioid Side Effects Related to Cancer Patients' Clinical Characteristics: A Post-Hoc Analysis. Pain Pract. 2018 Jul;18(6):748-757. doi: 10.1111/papr.12669. Epub 2018 Jan 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29220110 (View on PubMed)

Corli O, Floriani I, Roberto A, Montanari M, Galli F, Greco MT, Caraceni A, Kaasa S, Dragani TA, Azzarello G, Luzzani M, Cavanna L, Bandieri E, Gamucci T, Lipari G, Di Gregorio R, Valenti D, Reale C, Pavesi L, Iorno V, Crispino C, Pacchioni M, Apolone G; CERP STUDY OF PAIN GROUP (List of collaborators). Are strong opioids equally effective and safe in the treatment of chronic cancer pain? A multicenter randomized phase IV 'real life' trial on the variability of response to opioids. Ann Oncol. 2016 Jun;27(6):1107-1115. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw097. Epub 2016 Mar 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26940689 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Studio CERP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id