Levorphanol as a Second Line Opioid in Reducing Pain in Patients With Cancer
NCT ID: NCT03579446
Last Updated: 2025-08-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
EARLY_PHASE1
43 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-11-29
2023-06-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Methadone, Morphine, or Oxycodone in Treating Pain in Patients With Cancer
NCT00726830
Morphine Versus Methadone As First Line Strong Opioid for Cancer Pain
NCT00634010
Oxycodone or Standard Pain Therapy in Treating Patients With Cancer Pain
NCT00378937
5x-Multiplier vs 3-Tier Model for Discharge Opioid Prescriptions After Intra-abdominal Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06232577
Study of Opioid Rotation Versus Opioid Escalation in Patients With Moderate to Severe Cancer Pain
NCT02084355
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
I. To determine the proportion of successful opioid rotation (OR) from morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) to levorphanol at the primary end point.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine the median opioid rotation ratio (ORR) in patients undergoing successful opioid rotations from morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) to levorphanol in the Supportive Care Center (SCC) or Pain Clinic.
II. To determine the effect of levorphanol on cancer pain (as measured by change in Edmonton Symptom Assessment System's \[ESAS\] pain item from baseline) in cancer outpatients undergoing opioid rotation to levorphanol at the primary end point of treatment.
III. To determine the association between the opioid rotation ratio from MEDD to levorphanol and baseline MEDD prior to opioid rotation.
IV. Measure levorphanol related side effects using the opioid side effect scale at day 10 +/- 1 of starting levorphanol.
V. Determine what percentage of patients rotated to levorphanol achieve their personalized pain goal.
VI. Determine the predictors of successful opioid rotation from other opioids to levorphanol.
OUTLINE:
Patients receive levorphanol orally (PO) every 8 or 12 hours for 30 days. Patients may receive opioid regimen including hydrocodone, morphine, hydromorphone, oxycodone, and oxymorphone for breakthrough pain. Patients may continue levorphanol for an additional 6-8 months if it is determined by the Principal Investigator the patient can continue.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Supportive care (levorphanol, opioid regimen)
Patients receive levorphanol PO every 8 or 12 hours for 30 days. Patients may receive opioid regimen including hydrocodone, morphine, hydromorphone, oxycodone, and oxymorphone for breakthrough pain. Patients may continue levorphanol for an additional 6-8 months if it is determined by the Principal Investigator the patient can continue.
Hydrocodone
Given by PO
Hydromorphone
Given by PO
Levorphanol
Given PO
Morphine
Given by PO
Oxycodone
Given by PO
Oxymorphone
Given by PO
Questionnaire Administration
Ancillary studies
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Hydrocodone
Given by PO
Hydromorphone
Given by PO
Levorphanol
Given PO
Morphine
Given by PO
Oxycodone
Given by PO
Oxymorphone
Given by PO
Questionnaire Administration
Ancillary studies
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of cancer related pain currently treated with first line strong oral opioid analgesics such as morphine, oxycodone, oxymorphone, hydromorphone or hydrocodone
* Age 18 or older
* Able to complete study assessments
* Individual is willing to sign written informed consent
* Patients who are classified as being opioid tolerant by receiving a baseline MEDD of \>= 60 mg
* Patients who are local and able to follow-up in the SCC or Pain Clinic within 30 days if necessary
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of =\< 3
Exclusion Criteria
* Renal insufficiency defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate of \< 60
* Hepatic insufficiency defined as transaminitis (aspartate aminotransferase \[AST\] or alanine aminotransferase \[ALT\] \> 3 times the highest normal value) or hyperbilirubinemia of \> 1.5 times the highest normal value
* Non-English speaking participants as not all assessments are validated in other languages
* Presence of neuropathic pain as a primary pain syndrome
* Non-malignant pain
* Patients with history of alcohol or substance abuse by using Cut-down, Annoyed, Guilty, Eye-opener adapted to include Drug use questionnaire (CAGE-AID) score of 2 or higher; Pain Clinic: Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain (SOAPP) score of 7 or higher. In the unlikely event that CAGE-AID or SOAPP is not present in patient's chart, a CAGE-AID questionnaire will be administered after obtaining verbal consent for screening
* Patients receiving methadone due to reasons such as long and variable half-life
* Patients receiving scheduled benzodiazepines due to the risk of excessive sedation
* Patients with a MEDD of \> 300
* Unable or unwilling to sign consent
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Akhila S Reddy
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
M D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
MD Anderson Cancer Center Website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCI-2018-01139
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2017-0925
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2017-0925
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.