Study of Breakthrough Cancer Pain: Assessment of Fentanyl Buccal Tablets Titration and Treatment in Opioid-Tolerant Patients

NCT ID: NCT00842829

Last Updated: 2012-10-01

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

330 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-01-31

Study Completion Date

2011-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) is a common problem in patients with cancer. Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT) is used for the treatment of BTP in adults with cancer who are already receiving maintenance opioid therapy for chronic cancer pain. FBT treatment should be individually titrated to an effective dose that provides adequate analgesia and minimizes undesirable effects. To reach the safest effective dose for the individual patient as soon as possible, the dose titration process is critical. The aim of this study, conducted under pragmatic conditions in a large-scale population of cancer patients is to compare the proportion of patients reaching an effective FBT dose after titration starting with either a 100 mcg dose or a 200 mcg dose.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cancer Pain Breakthrough Pain

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Breakthrough Cancer Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

FBT 100 mcg

During the Titration Period, participants took fentanyl buccal tables (FBT) with a starting dose of 100 mcg until they reached an effective dose, with a maximum dose of 800 mcg and a maximum timeframe of 7 days. Participants who reached an effective dose entered the Open-label Treatment Period, whose length depended on how long was needed to treat up to 8 episodes of breakthrough pain (BTP) with FBT (maximum of 8 days). The length of the Continuation Period (when applicable) varied from country to country, up to until FBT was commercially available in that country.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)

Intervention Type DRUG

FBTs were self-administered by participants via the oral mucosa. During the open-label dose titration period, participants used 1 to 4 tablets of the 100 mcg or 200 mcg strength to individually titrate upwards to an effective dose through the range of available strengths (i.e. 100, 200, 400, 600, or 800 mcg). For the open-label treatment and continuation periods, single dose tablets at the effective dose identified during the titration period were used. The maximum dose allowed per breakthrough pain (BTP) episode was 800 mcg. On any single day, participants were not to use FBT for more than 4 BTP episodes.

FBT 200 mcg

During the Titration Period, participants took fentanyl buccal tables (FBT) with a starting dose of 200 mcg until they reached an effective dose, with a maximum dose of 800 mcg and a maximum timeframe of 7 days. Participants who reached an effective dose entered the Open-label Treatment Period, whose length depended on how long was needed to treat up to 8 episodes of breakthrough pain (BTP) with FBT (maximum of 8 days). The length of the Continuation Period (when applicable) varied from country to country, up to until FBT was commercially available in that country.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)

Intervention Type DRUG

FBTs were self-administered by participants via the oral mucosa. During the open-label dose titration period, participants used 1 to 4 tablets of the 100 mcg or 200 mcg strength to individually titrate upwards to an effective dose through the range of available strengths (i.e. 100, 200, 400, 600, or 800 mcg). For the open-label treatment and continuation periods, single dose tablets at the effective dose identified during the titration period were used. The maximum dose allowed per breakthrough pain (BTP) episode was 800 mcg. On any single day, participants were not to use FBT for more than 4 BTP episodes.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)

FBTs were self-administered by participants via the oral mucosa. During the open-label dose titration period, participants used 1 to 4 tablets of the 100 mcg or 200 mcg strength to individually titrate upwards to an effective dose through the range of available strengths (i.e. 100, 200, 400, 600, or 800 mcg). For the open-label treatment and continuation periods, single dose tablets at the effective dose identified during the titration period were used. The maximum dose allowed per breakthrough pain (BTP) episode was 800 mcg. On any single day, participants were not to use FBT for more than 4 BTP episodes.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Fentora CEP-25608 Fentanyl citrate Effentora

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The patient is willing to provide written informed consent to participate in this study.
* The patient can be either an out-patient or an in-patient.
* The patient has a histologically documented diagnosis of cancer.
* The patient has stable background pain due to cancer.
* The patient experiences up to 4 BTcP episodes per 24 hours.
* As maintenance opioid therapy, the patient is currently taking 1 of the following: at least 60 mg of oral morphine/day, at least 25 mcg of transdermal fentanyl/hour, at least 30 mg of oxycodone/day, at least 8 mg of hydromorphone/day, of an equianalgesic dose of another opioid for a week or longer before administration of the first dose of study drug.
* Women of childbearing potential, using a medically accepted, highly effective method of birth control and agree to continued use of this method for the duration of the study.
* The patient must be willing and able to successfully self-administer the study drug and to fill in study documents.

Exclusion Criteria

* The patient is without maintenance opioid therapy.
* The patient has uncontrolled or rapidly escalating pain as determined by the investigator.
* The patient has known or suspected hypersensitivities, allergies, or other contraindications to the active drug or to any of the excipients of the study drug.
* The patient has respiratory depression or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or any other medical condition predisposing to respiratory depression.
* The patient has medical or psychiatric disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise collected data.
* The patient is expected to have surgery during the study.
* The patient is pregnant or lactating.
* The patient has participated in a study involving an investigational drug in the prior 30 days.
* The patient has received a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) within 14 days before the first treatment with study drug.
* The patient has any other medical condition or is receiving concomitant medication/therapy (e.g., regional nerve block) that could, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise the patient's safety or compliance with the study protocol, or compromise collected data.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cephalon

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sponsor's Medical Expert

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Cephalon Europe

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Investigational Site

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Investigational Site

Włocławek, , Poland

Site Status

Investigational Site

A Coruña, , Spain

Site Status

Investigational Site

A Coruña, , Spain

Site Status

Investigational Site

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Investigational Site

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Investigational Site

Bilbao, , Spain

Site Status

Investigational Site

Cadiz, , Spain

Site Status

Investigational Site

Córdoba, , Spain

Site Status

Investigational Site

Granada, , Spain

Site Status

Investigational Site

Lleida, , Spain

Site Status

Investigational Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Investigational Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Investigational Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Investigational Site

Palma de Mallorca, , Spain

Site Status

Investigational Site

Pamplona, , Spain

Site Status

Investigational Site

Salamanca, , Spain

Site Status

Investigational Site

San Cristóbal de La Laguna, , Spain

Site Status

Investigational Site

Santander, , Spain

Site Status

Investigational Site

Santiago de Compostela, , Spain

Site Status

Investigational Site

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Investigational Site

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Investigational Site

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Investigational Site

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Investigational Site

Bath, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Investigational Site

Dumfries, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Investigational Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Investigational Site

Nottingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Investigational Site

Plymouth, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Investigational Site

Surrey, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Investigational Site

Bayonne, , France

Site Status

Investigational Site

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Investigational Site

Caen, , France

Site Status

Investigational Site

Clichy, , France

Site Status

Investigational Site

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

Investigational Site

Le Chesnay, , France

Site Status

Investigational Site

Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, , France

Site Status

Investigational Site

Le Mans, , France

Site Status

Investigational Site

Lorient, , France

Site Status

Investigational Site

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Investigational Site

Nevers, , France

Site Status

Investigational Site

Orléans, , France

Site Status

Investigational Site

Paris, , France

Site Status

Investigational Site

Paris, , France

Site Status

Investigational Site

Paris, , France

Site Status

Investigational Site

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Investigational Site

Poitiers, , France

Site Status

Investigational Site

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Investigational Site

Saint-Herblain, , France

Site Status

Investigational Site

Tarbes, , France

Site Status

Investigational Site

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Investigational Site

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Investigational Site

Bad Honnef, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Bad Lippspringe, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Bonn, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Böhlen, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Duisburg, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Duisburg, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Erfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Geesthacht, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Greifenstein, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Herne, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Hildesheim, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Kassel, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Lohsa, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Lünen, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Munich, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Munich, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Mülhausen, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Neustadt, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Rostock, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Weiden, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Würselen, , Germany

Site Status

Investigational Site

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

Investigational Site

Aviano, , Italy

Site Status

Investigational Site

Bari, , Italy

Site Status

Investigational Site

Brescia, , Italy

Site Status

Investigational Site

Cagliari, , Italy

Site Status

Investigational Site

Candiolo, , Italy

Site Status

Investigational Site

Caserta, , Italy

Site Status

Investigational Site

Cosenza, , Italy

Site Status

Investigational Site

Florence, , Italy

Site Status

Investigational Site

Garbagnate Milanese, , Italy

Site Status

Investigational Site

Genova, , Italy

Site Status

Investigational Site

Lugo, , Italy

Site Status

Investigational Site

L’Aquila, , Italy

Site Status

Investigational Site

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Investigational Site

Modena, , Italy

Site Status

Investigational Site

Napoli, , Italy

Site Status

Investigational Site

Palermo, , Italy

Site Status

Investigational Site

Piacenza, , Italy

Site Status

Investigational Site

Pisa, , Italy

Site Status

Investigational Site

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Investigational Site

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Investigational Site

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Investigational Site

Torino, , Italy

Site Status

Investigational Site

Torino, , Italy

Site Status

Investigational Site

Verona, , Italy

Site Status

Investigational Site

Bielsko-Biala, , Poland

Site Status

Investigational Site

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Investigational Site

Elblag, , Poland

Site Status

Investigational Site

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Investigational Site

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Investigational Site

Gliwice, , Poland

Site Status

Investigational Site

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Investigational Site

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Investigational Site

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Investigational Site

Puszczykowo, , Poland

Site Status

Investigational Site

Szczecin, , Poland

Site Status

Investigational Site

Szczecin, , Poland

Site Status

Investigational Site

Tychy, , Poland

Site Status

Investigational Site

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Investigational Site

Sutton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands France Germany Ireland Italy Poland Spain United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2008-001841-24

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

C25608/4027/BP/EU

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id